Abstract
This essay analyzes whether architecture is a language in the sense of being capable of telling its own story and how to assess the communicative value of the architects’ guiding story that inspired their architecture. The chapter argues that architecture’s “language of forms” is like a language insofar as architecture consists of traceable but in themselves meaningless unities that are built into recognizable patterns and insofar as it has a syntax of rules and conventions that prevent form combinations from becoming arbitrary. It is unlike a language insofar as its patterns and structure lack the semantic quality of making referential statements on the outside world. The same goes for music. The essay suggests that three basic relationships between humans and their world open up three distinctively orientated spaces: being-part, being-initiating, and being-at-a-distance. These correlate to mood space, movement space, and open space, respectively. The language of architectural forms, then, appeals to the tactile-emotional, mobile-goal-oriented, and visual-contemplative sensitivities of humans instead of translating narratives into architecture. The only story at the architects’ disposal is the story of their own taste and style. Architecture can do without the personal story of the architect’s taste and style, but this story has the added value of making explicit what is already visible, thus functioning like the decoration that illustrates the point. The larger frameworks of reference of cultural traditions that left their mark on architecture tend to be equally or more helpful as “guiding stories,” in cueing and experiencing architectural spaces as meaningful, as the “dry landscape garden” of Ryoan-ji in Kyoto can exemplify.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boehm, G. (1978). Zu einer Hermeneutik des Bildes. In H.-G. Gadamer & G. Boehm (Eds.), Seminar: Die Hermeneutik und die Wissenschaften (pp. 444–471). Frankfurt a/Main: Suhrkamp.
Giedion, S. (1971). Architecture and the phenomena of transition. In The three space conceptions in architecture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Inaji, T., & Virgilio, P., transl. (1998). The garden as architecture: Form and Spirit in the Gardens of Japan, China and Korea. Tokyo: Kodansha International.
Inoue, M. (1985). Space in Japanese architecture. New York/Tokyo: Weatherhill.
Joedicke, J. (1985). Raum und form in der Architektur: Über den behutsamen Umgang mit der Vergangenheit. Space and form in architecture: A circumspect approach to the past. Stuttgart: Karl Krämer Verlag.
Jones, L. (2000). The hermeneutics of sacred architecture: Experience, interpretation, comparison. Vol. 1: Monumental Occasions: reflections on the eventfulness of religious architecture. Vol. 2: Hermeneutical calisthenics: A morphology of ritual-architectural priorities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Keswick, M. (1978). The Chinese garden: History, art and architecture. Contributions and conclusion by Charles Jencks. London: Academy Editions.
Kuitert, W. (2002). Themes in the History of Japanese Garden Art. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. (first edition 1988. Themes, Scenes, and Taste in the History of Japanese Garden Art. Amsterdam: J.C. Gieben.).
Langer, S. K. (1953). Feeling and form. A theory of art. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
Law, S. S. (2011). Being in traditional Chinese landscape painting. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 32(4), 369–382.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). La condition postmoderne. Rapport sur le savoir. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
Minnema, L. (2002). The paradox of Koan. Contemporary Buddhism: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 3(1), 21–29.
Nitschke, G. (2007). Japanese gardens: Right angle and natural form. Köln: Taschen Verlag.
Padovan, R. (1989). Dom Hans van der Laan: Architecture and the necessity of limits. Maastricht: Stichting Manutius.
Picht, G. (1987). Kunst und mythos. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett/J.G. Cotta.
Raulet, G. (1987). Singuläre geschichten und pluralistische ratio. In J. le Rider & G. Raulet (Eds.), Verabschiedung der (post-) moderne? Eine interdisziplinäre debatte (pp. 275–292). Tübingen: Narr.
Scruton, R. (1980). The aesthetics of architecture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Slawson, D. A. (1987). Secret teachings in the art of Japanese gardens: Design principles, aesthetic values. Tokyo/New York: Kodansha International Ltd..
Ströker, E. (1975). Philosophische untersuchungen zum raum. (Erster Teil: Der gelebte Raum) Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
van de Ven, C. (1987). Space in architecture. The evolution of a new idea in the theory and history of the modern movements. Assen/Maastricht/Wolfeboro: Van Gorcum.
van der Laan, D. H. (1977). De architectonische ruimte. Vijftien lessen over de dispositie van het menselijk verblijf. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
van Eck, C. A. (1995). Metafoor en betekenis: Over het interpreteren van de vestibule van Michelangelo’s Biblioteca Laurentiana. In F.R. Ankersmit a.o. (Ed.), Hermeneutiek en Cultuur: Interpretatie in de kunst- en cultuurwetenschappen (pp. 126–156). Amsterdam: Boom.
Vanderstappen, H. A. (2014). In R. E. Covey (Ed.), The landscape painting of China: Musings of a journeyman. Gainsville: University Press of Florida.
Vos, F., & Zürcher, E. (1964). Spel zonder snaren. Enige beschouwingen over Zen. Deventer: N. Kluwer.
Weiss, A. S. (2013). Zen landscapes: Perspectives on Japanese gardens and ceramics. London: Reaktion Books.
Wicks, R. (2004). Being in the dry Zen landscape. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 38(1), 112–122.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Minnema, L. (2020). The Language of Architecture and the Narrative of the Architect: An Essay on Spatial Orientation and Cultural Meaning in Architecture. In: Brunn, S., Kehrein, R. (eds) Handbook of the Changing World Language Map. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02438-3_62
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02438-3_62
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02437-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02438-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences