Skip to main content

Redefining Religious Criticism for Development of Worldview Literacy in Religious Education

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of the Changing World Language Map
  • 47 Accesses

Abstract

Religious criticism is usually associated with Western atheist religious criticism (Feuerbach, Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud). This approach, rooted in modernity, is closely linked to the scientific and rational worldview of the Enlightenment. Based on its binary approach, Western atheist religious criticism defines itself in opposition to religion, which, from this perspective, is sometimes reduced to premodern or even fundamentalist religious profiles.

The aim of this chapter is to show how a different approach to religious criticism rooted in a constructive postmodern theory and method (discourse analysis) can help provide a discerning pathway in the many facetted map of religious positions. From the point of view of religious education, this approach offers a new way to teach religion, which meets the demands of a globalized world. The goal is to help students develop worldview literacy. This skill enables students to juggle religious and nonreligious worldviews from a neutral position. Because religious education in Denmark is a mandatory subject in high schools and, by law, non-confessional, this way of communicating religious criticism as discernment rather than judgment helps students engage in this subject from a perspective that invites curiosity and empathy instead of defensiveness or aggression. In a world where it is no longer possible to remain isolated within one’s own religious position, worldview literacy is a skill that may help further a dialogue not only between religious worldviews but also between religious and nonreligious worldviews. The chapter presents pedagogical strategies and tools for developing this approach to religious education. The movie The Sound of Music is used as an example of how to help students develop worldview literacy in order to prepare them for entering the arena of present-day conflicting worldviews, where the themes of religion and dogma, religion and gender, and religion and science have been singled out. Finally, the academic benefits of this approach to religious education will be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abe, Maso. (1997). Zen and comparative studies (ed. Steven Heine). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, I. G. (1990). Religion in an age of science. London: SCM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2010). Mentalization based treatment for borderline personality disorder. World Psychiatry, 9(1), 11–15. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2816926/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enger, D. (2013). Religionskritik. Latvia: Systime.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enger, D. The hills are still alive – The Sound of Music fylder 50 år. Berlingske Tidende, December 17, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enger, D. (2016). Perspectives of religious criticism – The challenge of globalization. Viborg: Systime.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2004). Analysing discourse. Textual analysis for social research (2003). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, F. W. (2014). Götter Global. Wie die Welt zum Supermarkt der Religionen wird. München: C.H. Beck Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2013). A systems theory of religion. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Originally published in German as Die Religion der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. (2007). Overcoming religious illiteracy. A cultural studies approach to the study of religion in secondary education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newberg, A., & Waldman, M. R. (2012). Words can change your brain. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster (2018). Retrieved: May 7 http://www.learnersdictionary.com/definition/literacy

  • Schlitz, M., Vieten, C., Miller, E., Homer, K., Peterson, K., & Erickson-Freeman, K. (2011). The worldview literacy project: exploring new capacities for the 21st century student. New Horizons for Learning, 9(1). Retrieved: 30 Apr 2018 from http://jhepp.library.jhu.edu/ojs/index.php/newhorizons/article/view/37/35.

  • Sorensen, K. M. (2014). Ideologies and discourses: language, power, politics [Ideologier og diskurser: sprog, magt, poltik]. Copenhagen: Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, K. (1995). Sex, ecology, spirituality. Boston: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorthe Enger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Enger, D. (2020). Redefining Religious Criticism for Development of Worldview Literacy in Religious Education. In: Brunn, S., Kehrein, R. (eds) Handbook of the Changing World Language Map. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02438-3_118

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics