Skip to main content

Technological Dystopia in the Science Fiction Genre

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Theory and Research in Cultural Studies and Education

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

  • 410 Accesses

Abstract

Science fiction films as a mass medium for public consumption have disseminated cautionary parables of technological dystopia rooted in existing social and economic conditions. Metropolis (1927), Blade Runner (1982), Terminator (1984), and The Matrix (1999) illustrate transformations of the genre. The theme that ties them together is the representation of technology and its effect on human society in the future. Each film deals with the subject in different ways that ultimately relate to its cinematographic style, technical advancements, and the story line. And yet, the theme of the failed quest for utopia remains morally unresolved in the depiction of the rise of a technological dystopia and its effect on human society in a world to come, playing on the incommensurability of philosophical, religious, political, economic, and literary narratives of scientific progress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baker, R. (1993). Computer technology and special effects in contemporary cinema. In P. Hayward & T. Wollen (Eds.), Future visions: New technologies of the screen (pp. 31–45). London: British Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations (trans: Foss/Patton/Beitdamman), New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Begley, V. (2004). Blade runner and the postmodern: A reconsideration. Literature/Film Quarterly, 32, 186–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, H. L. (1976). Science fiction and the new dark age. Bowling Green: Popular Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukatman, S. (1993). Terminal identity: The virtual subject in postmodern science fiction. London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cavlelos, J. (1999). The science of star wars. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, J. (1996). Concealed circuits: Frankenstein’s monster, the medusa, and the cyborg. New York: Raritan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, P. K. (1991). Do androids dream of electric sheep? Bowling Green: Bowling Green State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, M. A. (2004). Technophilia: Technology, representation and the feminine. In S. Redmond (Ed.), Liquid metal: The science fiction film reader (pp. 182–190). London: Wallflower.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, J. (2000). Envisioning cyborg bodies: Notes from current research. In D. Bell & B. M. Kennedy (Eds.), The Cybercultures reader (pp. 540–551). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2004). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology and socialist feminism in the 1980s. In S. Redmond (Ed.), Liquid metal: The science fiction film reader (pp. 158–181). London: Wallflower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, W. (Ed.). (2002). The matrix and philosophy: Welcome to the desert of the real. New York: Open Court Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (2005). Archaeologies of the future: The desire called utopia and other science fictions (p. 2005). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski, M. (2007). The secret history of star wars. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, D., Leibowitz, F., & Ryan, M. (1984). Blade Runner: A diagnostic critique. Jump Cut, 29, 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, G. (2000). Spectacular narratives: Hollywood in the age of the blockbuster. New York: I.B. Tauris. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landon, B. (1992). The aesthetics of ambivalence: Rethinking science fiction film in the age of electronic (re)production. Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, A. (2015). Savior of the working man: Promethean allusions in Fritz Lang’s Metropolis (1927). In M. S. Cyrino & M. E. Safran (Eds.), Classical myth on screen (pp. 78–100). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media. New York: Gingko Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netzley, P. D. (2000). Encyclopedia of movie special effects. Phoenix: Oryx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poster, M., & Baudrillard, J. (1988). Selected writings. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammon, P. M. (1996). Future noir: The making of blade runner. New York: Harper Prism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, T. (2014). Blade runner and philosophy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sobchack, V. (1987). Screening space: The American science fiction film (2nd ed.). New York: Ungar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telotte, J. P. (1995). Replications: A robotic history of the science fiction film. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. E. (1988). Ideology as dystopia: An interpretation of “blade runner”. International Political Science Review/Revue internationale de science politique, 9(4), 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. (1986). Hollywood from Vietnam to Reagan. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Pericles Trifonas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Trifonas, P.P. (2020). Technological Dystopia in the Science Fiction Genre. In: Trifonas, P. (eds) Handbook of Theory and Research in Cultural Studies and Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01426-1_41-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01426-1_41-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01426-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01426-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics