Skip to main content

Neuro Law and Economics

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

Abstract

Neuro law and economics is a very young discipline that aims to study law and economics phenomena towards the help of neuroscientific techniques. These studies are the result of bringing together two different approaches that start from different disciplines in order to analyze, in particular, some aspects of the punishment. These two approaches are behavioral and experimental economics and the analyses deriving from the so-called neuro-law. These two disciplines have been developed independently in the last decades and only in the last years they are jointly used to implement scientific analyses of punishment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 819.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berg J, Dickhaut J, McCabe K (1995) Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games Econ Behav 10:122–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore SJ, Robbins TW (2012) Decision-making in the adolescent brain. Nat Neurosci 15(9):1184–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressler SL, Menon V (2010) Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles. Trends Cogn Sci 14(6):277–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan JSD (2016) Brain fingerprinting. Int Res J Eng Technol 3(07):494–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Christ SE, Van Essen DC, Watson JM, Brubaker LE, McDermott KB (2009) The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses. Cereb Cortex 19(7):1557–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2004) Third-party punishment and social norms. Evol Hum Behav 25:63–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Gacther S (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Am Econ Rev 90(4):980–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Gacther S (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415:137–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J Econ Behav Organ 3(4):367–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J, McElreath R, Barr A, Ensminger J, Barrett C, Bolyanatz A, Cardenas JC, Gurven M, Gwako E, Henrich N, Lesorogol C, Marlowe F, Tracer D, Ziker J (2006) Costly punishment across human societies. Science. New Series 312(5781):1767–1770

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger F, Hoffman M (2016) The emerging neuroscience of third-party punishment. Trends Neurosci 39(8):499–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langleben DD, Loughead JW, Bilker WB, Ruparel K, Childress AR, Busch SI, Gur RC (2005) Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 26(4):262–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur Foundation research network on Law and Neuroscience (2016) www.lawneuro.org/LieDetect.pdf

  • Marlowe FW, Berbesque JC (2007) More ‘altruistic’ punishment in larger societies. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 275(1634):587–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer EH, Verschuere B, Gamer M, Merckelbach H, Ben-Shakhar G (2016) Deception detection with behavioral, autonomic, and neural measures: conceptual and methodological considerations that warrant modesty. Psychophysiology 53:593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder LB (2016) When sanction convey moral norms. Eur J Law Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-016-9532-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottone S, Ponzano F, Zarri L (2015) Power to the people? An experimental analysis of bottom-up accountability of third-party institutions. J Law Econ Org 31(2):347–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petoft A (2015) Neurolaw: a brief introduction. Iran J Neurol 14(1):53

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisoni A, Lo Gerfo E, Ottone S, Ponzano F, Zarri L, Vergallito A, Lauro LJR (2014) Fair play doesn’t matter: MEP modulation as a neurophysiological signature of status quo bias in economic interactions. Neuroimage 101:150–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puranik DA, Jospeh SK, Daundkar BB, Garad MV (2009, November) Brain signature profiling in India: it’s status as an aid in investigation and as corroborative evidence-as seen from judgements. In: Proceedings of XX all India forensic science conference, pp 815–822

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanfey AG, Rilling JK, Aronson JA, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD (2003) The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science 300(5626):1755–1758

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferruccio Ponzano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lo Gerfo, E., Ponzano, F. (2019). Neuro Law and Economics. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_637

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics