Skip to main content

Prisoner’s Dilemma

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

Abstract

The Prisoner’s Dilemma (PD) is probably the most famous two-person game in which a fundamental divergence between individual and collective rationalities arises: If the agents play noncooperatively, an equilibrium is achieved which, however, does not constitute the best available solution. Such a PD situation characterizes many situations of voluntary cooperation, e.g., the provision of the global public good climate protection. But in reality agents are – despite the predictions of the PD game – often willing to cooperate voluntarily to some degree which has been confirmed by experimental economics. Furthermore there are a lot of institutional devices which help overcome the cooperation dilemma in a PD situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 819.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox TH, Lobel S, McLeod PL (1991) Effects of ethic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Acad Manage J 34:827–847

    Google Scholar 

  • Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J Econ Lit 47:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellingsen T, Johannesson M, Mollerstrom J, Munkhammar S (2012) Social framing effects: preferences or beliefs? Games Econ Behav 76:117–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Schmidt KM (2006) The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism – Experimental evidence and new theories. In: Kolm SC (ed) Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 615–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones G (2008) Are smarter groups more cooperative? Evidence from prisoner’s dilemma experiments, 1959–2003. J Econ Behav Organ 68:489–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall G, Yao X, Chong SY (2007) The iterated prisoner’s dilemma: 20 years on. Advances in natural computation. World Scientific Pub Co, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Khadjavi M, Lange A (2013) Prisoners and their dilemma. J Econ Behav Organ 92:163–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne MJ (2009) An introduction to game theory. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2000) Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Econ Perspect 14:137–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport A, Chammah AM (1965) Prisoner’s dilemma: a study of conflict and cooperation. Michigan University Press, Ann Arbor

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sally D (1995) Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: a meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Ration Soc 7:58–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Buchholz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Buchholz, W., Eichenseer, M. (2019). Prisoner’s Dilemma. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_557

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics