Abstract
This entry provides an introductory account of cartels and collusion and the means used by European and American law to control such practices. The welfare-reducing and welfare-enhancing features of these cartel and other cartel-type arrangements are discussed to demonstrate the need for considered regulation. Both horizontal and vertical arrangements are analyzed, given their different uses and effects in the economy. However, as some forms of collusive activity are welfare enhancing, these are discussed in an effort to show why regulating such behavior must be done with care. Criminal, administrative, and private sanctions are compared as means of control of such agreements. Other topics briefly discussed the nature of (legally) permitted and prohibited collusive information exchange and noneconomic concerns which may justify collusive behavior.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Books, Articles, Speeches and Other Documents
Beaton-Wells C, Ezrachi A (eds) (2011) Criminalising cartels: critical studies of an international regulatory movement. Hart, Oxford
Becker G (1968) Crime and punishment: an economic approach. J Polit Econ 76:169–217
Bork RH (1993) The antitrust paradox: a policy at war with itself, rev edn. Basic Books, New York
Brisimi V, Ioannidou M (2011) Criminalizing cartels in Greece: a tale of hasty developments and shaky grounds. World Compet 34:157–176
Connor JM (2010) Recidivism revealed: private international cartels 1990–2009. Compet Policy Int 6:101–127
Connor JM, Helmers CG (2007) Statistics on private international cartels. American Antitrust Institute AAI working paper no 07–01. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1103610. Accessed 4 Oct 2014
Cseres KJ, Schinkel MP, Vogelaar FOW (eds) (2006) Criminalization of competition law enforcement: economic and legal implications for the EU member states. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Department of Justice (2014) Criminal enforcement fine and jail charts through fiscal year 2013. Available at http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/criminal/264101.html. Accessed 4 Oct 2014
Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission (1995) Antitrust guidelines for the licensing of intellectual property. Available at http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/guidelines/0558.htm. Accessed 4 Oct 2014
EU Competition Commission (2013) EU competition law rules applicable to antitrust enforcement. General block exemption regulations and guidelines, vol II. Brussels, EU. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/legislation/handbook_vol_1_en.pdf. Accessed 4 Oct 2014
EU Competition Commission (2014) Cartel statistics. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/competition/cartels/statistics/statistics.pdf. Accessed 4 Oct 2014
Faull J, Nikpay A (2014) The EU law of competition, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice (2000) Antitrust guidelines for collaborations among competitors. Available at http://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/public_events/joint-venture-hearings-antitrust-guidelines-collaboration-among-competitors/ftcdojguidelines-2.pdf. Accessed 4 Oct 2014
Hodge TC (2012) Compatible or conflicting: the promotion of a high level of employment and the consumer welfare standard under article 101. William and Mary Bus Law Rev 3:59–138
Jensen M, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financial Econ 34:305–360
Jones A, Sufrin B (2014) EU competition law: text, cases and materials, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kaplow L (2013) Competition policy and price fixing. Princeton University Press, Princeton/Oxford
Kovacic WE, Marshall RC, Marx LM, White HL (2011) Plus factors and agreement in antitrust law. Michigan Law Rev 110:394–436
Kroes N (2009) Tackling cartels – a never-ending task. Anti-cartel enforcement: criminal and administrative policy – panel session, Brasilia. Available at http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/09/454%26format=HTML%26aged=0%26language=EN%26guiLanguage=en. Accessed 4 Oct 2014
Lande RH (1993) Are antitrust ‘treble’ damages really single damages. Ohio State Law J 54:115–174
Leibenstein H (1966) Allocative efficiency vs. X-inefficiency. Am Econ Rev 56:392–415
MacCulloch A (2012) The cartel offence: defining an appropriate ‘moral space’. Eur Compet J 8:73–93
Marshall RC, Marx LM (2012) The economics of collusion: cartels and bidding rings. MIT Press, London/Cambridge, MA
Marvel HP, McCafferty S (1984) Resale price maintenance and quality certification. Rand J Econ 15:346–359
Mathewson F, Winter R (1998) The law and economics of resale price maintenance. Rev Ind Organ 13:57–84
Monti G (2002) Article 81 EC and public policy. Common Mark Law Rev 39:1057–1099
Motta M (2004) Competition policy: theory and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Neils G, Jenkins H, Kavanagh J (2011) Economics for competition lawyers. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2000) Hard core cartels: 2000. OECD, Paris
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Directorate for Financial, Fiscal and Enterprise Affairs Competition Committee (2002) Report on the nature and impact of hard core cartels and sanctions against cartels under national competition laws. DAFFE/COMP(2002)7 OECD, Paris. Available at www.oecd.org/dataoecd/16/20/2081831.pdf. Accessed 4 Oct 2014
Posner R (1975) The social cost of monopolies and regulation. J Polit Econ 83:807–827
Smith A (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: printed for W. Strahan; and T. Cadell
Stephan A (2008) Survey of public attitudes to price-fixing and cartel enforcement in Britain. Compet Law Rev 5:123–145
Stephan A (2014) Four key challenges to the successful criminalization of cartel laws. J Antitrust Enforcement 2:333–362
Stigler G (1964) A theory of oligopoly. J Polit Econ 72:44–59
Veljanovski C (2006) The economics of cartels. Finnish Competition Law Year Book. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=975612. Accessed 4 Oct 2014
Wardhaugh B (2012) A normative approach to the criminalisation of cartel activity. Legal Stud 32:369–395
Wardhaugh B (2014) Cartels, markets and crime: a normative justification for the criminalisation of economic collusion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Werden GJ, Hammond SD, Barnett BA (2011) Recidivism eliminated: Cartel enforcement in the United States since 1999. Speech before the: Georgetown global antitrust enforcement symposium. Washington, DC. Available at http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/speeches/275388.pdf. Accessed 4 Oct 2014
Whelan P (2007) A principled argument for personal criminal sanctions as punishment under EC cartel law. Compet Law Rev 4:7–40
Whelan P (2014) The criminalization of European cartel enforcement theoretical, legal, and practical challenges. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Which? (A Consumer Advocacy Group) (2011) JJB sports: a case study in collective action. Available at http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/collective-redress-case-study-which-briefing-258401.pdf. Accessed 4 Oct 2014
Whish RP (2000) Recent developments in community competition law 1998/99. Eur Law Rev 25:219–246
Witt AC (2012a) From Airtours to Ryanair: is the more economic approach to EU merger law really about more economics? Common Mark Law Rev 49:217–246
Witt AC (2012b) Public policy goals under EU competition law – now is the time to set the house in order. Eur Compet J 8:443–471
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2002) Working group on the interaction between trade and competition policy, provisions on hardcore cartels: background note by the secretariat. WT/WGTCP/W/191. Geneva, WTO. 20 June 2002
Cases
Commission Decisions
Dutch Brick Industry (“Stichting Baksteen”), Commission Decision of 29 Apr 1994 (IV/34.456) [1994] OJ L-131/15
Synthetic Fibres, Commission Decision of 4 July 1984 (IV/30.810) [1984] OJ L-207/17
European Courts
Case 48/69 ICI v Commission [1972] ECR 619
Case 89/85 etc Ahlström Osakeyhtiö et al v Commission (“Wood Pulp II”) [1993] ECR I-1307
Case C-199/92 P Hüls AG v Commission [1999] ECR I-4287
Case C-277/87 Sandoz prodotti farmaceutici SpA v Commission [1990] ECR I-45
Case T-41/96 Bayer AG v Commission [2000] ECR II-3383, affirmed Cases C-2 and 2/01 P [2004] ECR I-23
Cases 56 and 58/64 Établissements Consten S.à.R.L. and Grundig-Verkaufs-GmbH v. Commission [1966] ECR 299
Cases 228 and 229/82 Forde Werke AG and Ford of Europe Inc v Commission [1984] ECR 1129
UK
Argos Limited and Littlewoods Limited v Office of Fair Trading [2004] CAT 24 (“Board Games”) (Judgment on Liability)
JJB Sports PLC v Office of Fair Trading and Allsports Limited v Office of Fair Trading [2004] CAT 17 (“Replica Football Kits”) (Judgment on Liability)
Tesco Stores Ltd, Tesco Holdings Ltd and Tesco Plc v Office of Fair Trading [2012] CAT 31 (“Dairy”) (Judgment on Liability)
US
Broadcast Music, Inc v CBS, 441 US 1 (USSC 1979)
California Dental Association v FTC, 526 US 756 (USSC 1999)
Continental TV, Inc v GTE Sylvania Inc, 433 US 36 (USSC 1977)
Dr Miles v John D. Park & Sons Co, 220 US 373 (USSC 1911)
Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc v PSKS, Inc, 551 US 877 (USSC 2007)
National Collegiate Athletic Association v Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma, 468 US 85 (USSC 1984)
Northern Pacific Railway v United States, 356 US 1 (USSC 1958)
Standard Oil Co v United States, 221 US 1 (USSC 1911)
United States v Apple Inc, 952 F Supp 2d 638, 2013–2 Trade Cases P 78,447 (SDNY July 10, 2013)
Verizon Communications Inc v Law Offices of Curtis V Trinko, LLP, 540 US 398 (USSC 2004)
Statutes and Other Legal Instruments
UK
Enterprise Act 2002
Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013
European Union
Commission Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 of 20 April 2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices [2010] OJ L-102/1
Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (“Regulation 1/2003”) [2003] OJ L-1/1
Guidelines on Vertical Restraints [2010] OJ C-130/1
Regulation No 17: First Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty (“Regulation 17/62”) OJ 013, 21/02/1962 pp 0204–0211
Treaty for the Functioning of the European Union (Consolidated version) [2012] OJ C-326/47
US
Clayton Act, 15 USC §§ 12–27, 29, 52–53
National Cooperative Research Act of 1984 and the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, codified together at 15 USC §§ 4301–06
Sherman Act, 15 USC §§ 1–7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Wardhaugh, B. (2019). Cartels and Collusion. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_555
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_555
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7752-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7753-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences