Skip to main content

Signalling

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Encyclopedia of Law and Economics
  • 19 Accesses

Abstract

In his seminal paper “Spence (Q J Econ 87(3):355–374, 1973)” introduced a signalling model for the job market. In this model the employer (the principal) is not sure about the ability of the potential employee (the agent). Spence’s idea is that the education level of an applicant serves as a signal to indicate productivity level. The crucial assumption is that people with higher productivity incur lower costs (money, effort) of acquiring education than those with lower productivity. This leads to the fundamental insight that even if education did not contribute anything to work productivity, it can serve as a tool to separate high- from low-ability employees. In 2001, Michael Spence won the Nobel Prize in economic sciences, along with George A. Akerlof and Joseph E. Stiglitz, for their significant contribution on the analysis of markets with asymmetric information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 819.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akerlof GA (1970) The market for “Lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ 84(3):488–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211(4489):1390–1396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird DG, Gertner R, Picker R (1998) Game theory and the law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho I-K, Kreps DM (1987) Signalling games and stable equilibria. Q J Econ 102(2):179–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank R (2010) Microeconomics and behavior. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game theory. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi J (1967) Games with incomplete information played by bayesian players. Part I: the basic model. Manage Sci 14(3):159–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi J (1968a) Games with incomplete information played by bayesian players. Part II: bayesian equilibrium points. Manage Sci 14(5):320–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi J (1968b) Games with incomplete information played by bayesian players. Part III: the basic probability distribution of the game. Manage Sci 14(7):486–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holler MJ, Lindner I (2004) Mediation as signal. Eur J Law Econ 17:165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein B, Leffler K (1981) The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. J Pol Econ 89(4):615–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps DM, Wilson R (1982) Sequential equilibria. Econometrica 50(4):863–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams RH (2001) Signaling discount rates: law, norms, and economic methodology. The Yale Law J 110(4):625–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner EA (2000) Law and social norms. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten R (1975) Re-examination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games. Int J Game Theory 4:25–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence AM (1973) Job market signaling. Q J Econ 87(3):355–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence AM (1974) Market signaling. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence AM (2001) Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets, Nobel prize lecture. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/2001/spencelecture.pdf

  • Stiglitz J, Weiss A (1990) Sorting out the differences between screening and signalling models, NBER Technical working paper, No. 93. In Bacharach MOL, Dempster MAH, Enos JL Mathematical models in economics: Oxford mathematical economics seminar, Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (2007) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ines Lindner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lindner, I. (2019). Signalling. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_439

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics