Skip to main content

Approaches to Developing Quantitative Risk Assessment Models

  • Protocol
Food-Borne Pathogens

Part of the book series: Methods in Biotechnologyâ„¢ ((MIBT,volume 21))

  • 1136 Accesses

Abstract

Risk assessment has become increasingly important as a tool in assessing risks from food-borne pathogens. There are many methodologies that may be used when constructing a risk assessment model, and there are many methodological issues, which are left to the risk assessor’s choice. A number of different approaches to developing a risk assessment model are detailed in this chapter, including the use of deterministic and stochastic variables. A step-by-step approach to creating a quantitative risk assessment model is given. The approach is illustrated with a worked example focusing on potential human exposure to bovine spongiform encephalopathy via meat products. A general framework and guiding principles for constructing a quantitative risk assessment are given, in addition to an outline of the use of Monte Carlo simulation, event tree/fault tree analysis, and sensitivity analysis. This chapter presents a procedure that will enable readers to familiarize themselves with the risk assessment process and equip them with the procedures necessary to construct risk assessment models for food-borne pathogens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hathaway, S. C., Pullen, M. M., and McKenzie, A. I. (1988) A model for assessment of organoleptic postmortem inspection procedures for meat and poultry. J. Amer. Vet. Med. Assoc. 192, 960–966.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cassin, M. H., Lammerding, A. M., Todd, E. C. D., Ross, W., and McColl, R. S. (1998) Quantitative risk assessment for Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef hamburgers. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 41, 21–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization. (2002) Risk assessments of Salmonella in eggs and broiler chickens—interpretative summary. ISBN 92-5-104873-8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenquist, H., Nielsen, N. L., Sommer, H. M., Norrung, B., and Christensen, B. B. (2003) Quantitative risk assessment of human campylobacteriosis associated with thermophilic Campylobacter species in chickens. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 83, 87–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stern, N. J., Hiett, K. L., Alfredsson, G. A., et al. (2003) Campylobacter spp. in Icelandic poultry operations and human disease. Epi. and Infect. 130, 23–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. vanSchothorst, M. (1997) Practical approaches to risk assessment. J. Food Protect. 60, 1439–1443.

    Google Scholar 

  7. NAFTA. (1993) North American Free Trade Agreement, Sanitary and phytosanitary measures, chapter 7, section B.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cummins, E. J., Grace, P. M., Fry, J. D., McDonnell K. P., and Ward, S. M. (2001) Predictive modelling and risk assessment of BSE: a review. J. Risk Res. 4, 251–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Codex Alimentarius Commission. (1999) Principles and guidelines for the conduct of microbiological risk assessment. CAC/GL-30.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burmaster, D. E. and Anderson, P. D. (1994) Principles of good practice for the use of Monte Carlo techniques in human health and ecological risk assessments. Risk Analysis 14, 477–481.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1997) Guiding principles for Monte Carlo analysis. EPA/630/R-97/001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cummins, E. J., Colgan S. F., Grace, P. M., Fry, J. D., McDonnell K. P., and Ward, S. M. (2002) Human risks from the combustion of SRM-derived tallow in Ireland. Human Ecol. Risk Assess. 8, 1177–1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cummins, E. J., Grace, P. M., Fry, J. D., McDonnell, K. P., Colgan, S. F., and Ward, S. M. (2002) Quantitative exposure assessment for the combustion of meat and bone meal derived from specified risk material in the context of BSE in Ireland. J. Agri. Safety Health 8, 365–383.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stewart, M. G. and Melchers, R. E. (1997) Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Engineering Systems. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kaplan, S. and Garrick, B. J. (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis 1, 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vose, D. (2000) Risk Analysis, A Quantitative Guide. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brattin, W., Barry, T. M., and Chiu, N. (1996) Monte Carlo modelling with uncertainty probability density functions. Human Ecol. Risk Assess. 2, 820–840.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Office International des Épizooties. (2002) International Animal Health Code 2002. Cited at http://www.oie.int/eng/normes/mcode/A_00067.htm. Last accessed 6/9/02.

  19. European Commission (1999a). The evaluation of tests for the diagnosis of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy in bovines, July 8, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. European Commission (2002). The evaluation of five rapid tests for the diagnosis of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy in bovines (2nd study). March 27, 2002. Available at http://www.irmm.jrc.be/bse_2.pdf. Accessed 9/23/02.

  21. Helps, C. R., Hindell, P., Hillman, T. J., et al. (2002) Contamination of beef carcasses by spinal cord tissue during splitting. Food Control, 13, 417–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. European Commission (1999b). Opinion of the Scientific Steering Committee on the human exposure risk (HER) via food with respect to BSE (adopted by the Scientific Steering Committee at its meeting of December 10, 1999). Brussels, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  23. European Commission (2000). Preliminary report on quantitative risk assessment on the use of the vertebral column for the production of gelatine and tallow, submitted to the Scientific Steering Committee at its meeting of April 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Donnelly, C. A. and Ferguson, N. M. (1999). Statistical aspects of BSE and vCJD, in Models for Epidemics (Cox, D. R., Isham, V., Keiding, N., Louis, T., Reid, N., and Tong, H., eds.). Chapman and Hall/CRC, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson, R. M., Donnelly, C. A., Ferguson, N. M., et al. (1996) Transmission dynamics and epidemiology of BSE in British cattle. Nature 382, 779–788.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Humana Press Inc.

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Cummins, E.J. (2006). Approaches to Developing Quantitative Risk Assessment Models. In: Adley, C.C. (eds) Food-Borne Pathogens. Methods in Biotechnologyâ„¢, vol 21. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-990-7:235

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-990-7:235

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-465-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-990-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics