Chemosensitivity Testing Using Microplate Adenosine Triphosphate-Based Luminescence Measurements

  • Christian M. Kurbacher
  • Ian A. Cree
Part of the Methods in Molecular Medicine™ book series (MIMM, volume 110)

Abstract

During the last two decades, novel nonclonogenic methods for pretherapeutic chemosensitivity testing have been developed that are likely to overcome major technical limitations of older assays such as low evaluability rates, low degree of standardization and reproducibility, lack of technical robustness, and poor methodological efficacy. Among these, the microplate adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-based tumor chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA) has gained particular merits for ex vivo chemosensitivity testing of native nonhematological tumors including cancers of the breast, ovary, gastrointestinal tract, cervix and corpus uteri, and lung; malignant melanomas; gliomas; sarcomas; and mesotheliomas. For this indication, the ATP-TCA can now be considered the best documented and validated technology. This assay, which is now commercially available, provides a highly reproducible, easy-to-handle kit technique; low technical failure rates; and a high methodological efficacy requiring only 1 × 106 tumor cells to test four to six different drugs or combinations. In ovarian and breast carcinomas, the predictive accuracy is <90%, with a positive predictive value of 85-90‰ and a negative predictive value near 100‰, respectively. In primary ovarian cancers, the ATP-TCA has been found to accurately predict both clinical response and survival. In two prospective clinical trials in patients with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer, chemotherapy individually selected by the ATP-TCA has been found to triple the response rates and nearly double the survival compared to empirically chosen regimens. Consequently, this assay, which is now under phase III evaluation, has successfully been used in new agent development to screen for novel chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of patients with breast and ovarian carcinoma and melanoma, respectively. This chapter highlights the recent preclinical and clinical experience with this promising technology and gives a detailed description of all the technical aspects of the ATP-TCA.

Key Words

Adenosine triphosphate-based tumor chemosensitivity assay breast cancer chemoresistance chemotherapy colorectal cancer luminescence malignant melanoma nonclonogenic assay ovarian carcinoma 

References

  1. 1.
    Bellamy, W. T. (1992) Prediction of response to drug therapy of cancer: a review of in vitro assays. Drugs 44, 690–708.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Vita, V. T. (1997) Principles of cancer management: chemotherapy, in Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology (DeVita, V. T., Hellman, S., and Rosenberg, S. A., eds.), Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp. 333–347.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cree, I. A. and Kurbacher C. M. (1997) Individualizing chemotherapy for solid tumors-is there any alternative? Anti-Cancer Drugs 8, 541–548.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Von Hoff, D. D. (1990) He’s not going to talk about in vitro predictive assays again, is he? J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 82, 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown, E. and Markman, M. (1996) Tumor chemosensitivity and chemoresistance assays. Cancer 77, 1020–1025.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cortazar, R. and Johnson, B. E. (1999) Review of the efficacy of individualized chemotherapy selected by in vitro drug sensitivity testing for patients with cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 17, 1625–1631.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andreotti, P. E., Cree, I. A., Kurbacher, C. M., et al. (1995) Chemosensitivity testing of human tumors using a microplate adenosine triphosphate luminescence assay: clinical correlation for cisplatin resistance of ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Res. 55, 5276–5282.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kangas, L., Gr/roos, M., and Nieminen, A. (1984) Bioluminescence of cellular ATP: a new method for evaluating cytotoxic agents in vitro. Med. Biol. 62, 338–343.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuzmits, R., Rumpold, H., Muller, M., and Schopf, G. (1986) The use of bioluminescence to evaluate the influence of chemotherapeutic drugs on ATP levels of malignant cell lines. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 24, 293–298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maehara, Y., Anai, H., Tamada, R., and Sugimachi, K. (1987) The ATP assay is more sensitive than the succinate dehydrogenase inhibition test for predicting cell viability. Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol. 23, 273–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Petty, R. D., Sutherland, L. A., Hunter, E. M., and Cree, I. A. (1995) Comparison of MTT and ATP-based assays for the measurement of viable cell number. J. Biolum. Chemilum. 10, 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ahmann, F., Garewal, H., Schifman, R., Celniker, A., and Rodney, S (1987) Intracellular adenosine triphosphate as a measure of human tumor cell viability and drug modulated growth. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 23, 474–480.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sevin, B.-U., Peng, Z., Perras, J., Penalver, G., and Averette, H. (1988) Application of an ATP bioluminescence assay in human tumor chemosensitivity testing. Gynecol. Oncol. 31, 191–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koechli, O. R., Avner, B. P., Sevin, B.-U., et al. (1994) Application of the ATP-Cell Viability Assay in human breast cancer chemosensitivity testing: a report on the first results. J. Surg. Oncol. 54, 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tereshima, M., Ikeda, K., Kawamura, H., et al. (1994) A comparative study on the ATP assay in serum-free media and the adhesive tumor cell culture system as a drug sensitivity test for human esophageal cancer. Cancer Res. Ther. Control 3, 297–304.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hunter, E. M., Sutherland, L. A., Cree, I. A., Dewar, J. A., Preece, P. E., and Andreotti, P. E. (1993) Heterogeneity of chemosensitivity in human breast carcinoma: use of an adenosine triphosphate (ATP) chemiluminescence assay. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 19, 242–249.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cree, I. A., Kurbacher, C. M., Untch, M., et al. (1996) Correlation of the clinical response to chemotherapy in breast cancer with ex vivo chemosensitivity. Anti-Cancer Drugs 7, 630–635.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kurbacher, C. M., Cree, I. A., Brenne, U., et al. (1996) Heterogeneity of in vitro chemosensitivity in perioperative breast cancer cells to mitoxantrone versus doxorubicin evaluated by a microplate ATP bioluminescence assay. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 41, 161–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kurbacher, C. M., Nagel, W., Mallmann, P., et al. (1994) In vitro activity of titanocenedichloride in human renal cell carcinoma compared to conventional antineoplastic agents. Anticancer Res. 14, 1529–1534.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Whitehouse, P. A., Knight, L. A., Di Nicolantonio, F., Mercer, S. J., Sharma, S., and Cree, I. A. (2003) Heterogeneity of chemosensitivity of colorectal adenocarcinoma determined by a modified ex vivo ATP-tumor chemosensitivity assay. Anti-Cancer Drugs 14, 369–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee, J.-M., Bruckner, H. W., Szrajer, L., and Brenne, U. (1995) Taxol inhibits growth of mesothelioma xenografts. Anticancer Res. 15, 693–696.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Myatt, N., Cree, I. A., Kurbacher, C. M., Foss, A. J. E., Hungerford, J. L., and Plowman, P. N. (1997) The ex vivo chemosensitivity profile of choroidal melanoma. Anti-Cancer Drugs 8, 756–762.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cree, I. A., Neale, M. H., Myatt, N. E., et al. (1999) Heterogeneity of chemosensitivity of metastatic cutaneous melanoma. Anti-Cancer Drugs 10, 437–444.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ugurel, S., Tilgen, W., and Reinhold, U. (2003) Chemosensitivity testing in malignant melanoma. Recent Results Cancer Res. 161, 81–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Di Nicolantonio, F., Neale M., Onadim, Z., Hungerford, J. L., Kingston, J., and Cree, I. A. (2003) The chemosensitivity profile of retinoblastoma. Recent Results Cancer Res. 161, 73–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kurbacher, C. M., Grecu, O. M., Stier, U., et al. (2003) ATP chemosensitivity testing in ovarian and breast cancer: early clinical trials. Recent Results Cancer Res. 161, 221–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Untch, M., Ditsch, N., Langer, E., et al. (2003) Chemosensitivity testing in gynecologic oncology-dream or reality? Recent Results Cancer Res. 161, 146–158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Konecny, G., Crohns, C., Pegram, M., et al. (2000) Correlation of drug response with the ATP tumor chemosensitivity assay in primary FIGO stage III ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 77, 258–263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kurbacher, C. M., Bruckner, H. W., Cree, I. A., et al. (1997) Mitoxantrone combined with paclitaxel as salvage therapy for platinum-refractory ovarian cancer: laboratory study and clinical pilot trial. Clin. Cancer Res. 3, 1527–1533.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Neale, M. H., Myatt, N., Cree, I. A., et al. (1999) Combination chemotherapy for choroidal melanoma: ex vivo sensitivity to treaosulfan with gemcitabine or cytosine arabinoside. Br. J. Cancer 79, 1487–1493.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kurbacher, C. M., Mallmann, P., Kurbacher, J. A., et al. (1994) In vitro activity of titanocenedichloride versus cisplatin and doxorubicin in primary and recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Anticancer Res. 14, 1961–1966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Neale, M. H., Charlton, P. A., and Cree, I. A. (2000) Ex vivo activity of XR5000 against solid tumors. Anti-Cancer Drugs 11, 471–478.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kurbacher, C. M., Bruckner, H. W., Andreotti, P. E., Kurbacher, J. A., Saß, G., and Krebs, D. (1995) In vitro activity of titanocenedichloride in four ovarian carcinoma cell lines evaluated by a microtiter plate ATP bioluminescence assay. Anti-Cancer Drugs 6, 697–704.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kurbacher, C. M., Cree, I. A., Bruckner, H. W., et al. (1998) Use of an ex vivo ATP luminescence assay to direct chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer. Anti-Cancer Drugs 9, 51–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kurbacher, C. M., Stier, U., Janät, M.-M., Cree, I. A., and Bruckner, H. W. (2001) ATP-assay directed chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer: mature results of an ISCO clinical study group trial. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 20, 185b.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sharma, S., Neale, M. H., Di Nicolantonio, F., et al. (2003) Outcome of ATPbased tumor chemosensitvity assay directed chemotherapy in heavily pretreated ovarian carcinoma. BMC Cancer 3, 19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hunter, E. M., Sutherland, L. A., Cree, I. A., Subedi, A. M. C., Hartmann, D., Linder, D., and Andreotti, P. E. (1994) The influence of storage on cytotoxic drug activity in an ATP-based chemosensitivity assay. Anti-Cancer Drugs 5, 171–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pöch, G. (1993) Combined Effects of Drugs and Toxic Agents: Modern Evaluation in Theory and Practice, Springer, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Andreotti, P. E., Linder, D., Hartmann, D. M., et al. (1993) ATP tumor chemosensitivity assay: application for solid tumor and leukemia, in Bioluminescence and Chemiluminescence: Current Status (Szalay, A. A., Stanley, P. E., and Kricka, L. J., eds.), John Wiley &Sons, Chichester, UK, pp. 271–275.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Neale, M. H., Lamont, A., Hindley, A., Kurbacher, C. M., and Cree, I. A. (2000) The ex vivo effect of high concentrations of doxorubicin on recurrent ovarian carcinoma. Anti-Cancer Drugs 11, 865–871.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cree, I. A. and Kurbacher, C. M. (1999) ATP based tumour chemosensitivity testing: assisting new agent development. Anti-Cancer Drugs 10, 431–435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Andreotti, P. E., Linder, D., Hartmann, D. M., Cree, I. A., Pazzagli, M., and Bruckner, H. W. (1994) TCA-100 Tumor Chemosensitivity Assay: differences in sensitivity between cultured tumor cell lines and clinical studies. J. Biolum. Chemilum. 9, 373–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cree, I. A. (2003) Chemosensitivity testing as an aid to anti-cancer drug and regimen development. Recent Results Cancer Res. 161, 119–125.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian M. Kurbacher
    • 1
  • Ian A. Cree
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Gynecology & ObstetricsUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
  2. 2.Department of HistopathologyQueen Alexandria HospitalPortsmouthUK

Personalised recommendations