Authentication of Scientific Human Cell Lines
Human cell lines are an important resource for research and most often used in reverse genetic approaches or as in vitro model systems of human diseases. In this regard, it is crucial that the cells faithfully correspond to the purported objects of study. A number of recent publications have shown an unacceptable level of cell lines to be false, in part as a result of the nonavailability of a simple and easy DNA profiling technique. We have validated different single- and multiple-locus variable numbers of tandem repeats (VNTRs) enabling the establishment of a noncommercial, but good laboratory practice, method for authentication of cell lines by DNA fingerprinting. Polymerase chain reaction amplification fragment length polymorphism (AmpFLP) of six prominent and highly polymorphic minisatellite VNTR loci, requiring only a thermal cycler and an electrophoretic system, was proven as the most reliable tool. Furthermore, the generated banding pattern and the determination of gender allows for verifying the authenticity of a given human cell line by simple agarose gel electrophoresis. The combination of rapidly generated DNA profiles based on single-locus VNTR loci and information on banding patterns of cell lines of interest by official cell banks (detailed information at the website http://www.dsmz.de) constitute a low-cost but highly reliable and robust method, enabling every researcher using human cell lines to easily verify cell line identity.
Key WordsAuthentication cross-contamination PCR DNA fingerprinting false cell lines VNTR AmpFLP
- 3.Rothfels, F. H., Axelrad, A. A., and Simonovitch, L. (1959) The origin of altered cell lines from mouse, monkey, and man as indicated by chromosomes and transplantation studies. Proc. Can. Cancer Res. Conf. 3, 189–214.Google Scholar
- 8.Dirks, W. G., MacLeod, R. A., Jaeger, K., Milch, H., and Drexler, H. G. (1999) First searchable database for DNA profiles of human cell lines: sequential use of fingerprint techniques for authentication. Cell. Mol. Biol. 5, 841–853.Google Scholar