Green Fluorescent Protein Quantification in Whole Plants

  • Matthew D. Halfhill
  • Reginald J. Millwood
  • C. Neal StewartJr.
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 286)

Summary

As future biotechnology applications utilize recombinant proteins as commercial products, nondestructive assays will be necessary to determine protein concentrations accurately within plant tissues. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) has been proposed as a potential marker for the monitoring of transgenic plants and quantifying recombinant protein levels under field conditions. This chapter discusses the utility of using GFP fluorescence as an indicator of protein concentrations and the methods used to quantify GFP fluorescence in whole plant tissues. Furthermore, we discuss the accuracy and effectiveness of the portable General Fluorescence Plant Meter (GFP Meter, Opti-Sciences, Inc.) compared to a laboratory-based spectrofluorometer (Fluoro-Max2, Jobin Yvon & Glen Spectra). In whole plants, GFP fluorescence was shown to be variable at each leaf position over time and among different leaves on the same plant. A leaf had its highest GFP fluorescence after emergence, and subsequently, its fluorescence intensity decreased over time. Younger leaves were significantly more fluorescent than older leaves on the same plant. GFP fluorescence intensity was directly correlated with the concentration of soluble protein per unit wet mass and with another genetically linked recombinant protein (Bacillus thuringiensis [Bt] cry1Ac endotoxin protein).

Key Words

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) green fluorescent protein (GFP) soluble protein concentration spectrofluorometer transgene monitoring 

References

  1. 1.
    Stewart, C. N., Jr. (1996) Monitoring transgenic plants using in vivo markers. Nat. Biotech. 14, 682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chalfie, M., Tu, Y., Euskirchen, G., Ward, W. W., and Prasher, D. C. (1994) Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science 263, 802–805.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prasher, D. C., Eckenrode, V. K., Ward, W. W., Pendergast, F. G., and Cormier, M. J. (1992) Primary structure of the Aequorea victoria green fluorescent protein. Gene 111, 229–233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Siemering, K. R., Golbik, R., Sever, R., and Haseloff, J. (1996) Mutations that suppress the thermosensitivity of green fluorescent protein. Curr. Biol. 6, 1653–1663.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chiu, W. L., Niwa, Y., Zeng, W., Hirano, T., Kobayashi, H., and Sheen, J. (1996) Engineered GFP as a vital reporter in plants. Curr. Biol. 6, 325–330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haseloff, J., Siemering, K. R., Prasher, D., and Hodge, S. (1997) Removal of a cryptic intron and subcellular localization of green fluorescent protein are required to mark transgenic Arabidopsis plants brightly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 2122–2127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harper, B. K., Mabon, S. A., Leffel, S. M., et al. (1999) Green fluorescent protein as a marker for expression of a second gene in transgenic plants. Nat. Biotech. 17, 1125–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Halfhill, M. D., Richards, H. A., Mabon, S. A., and Stewart, C. N., Jr. (2001) Expression of GFP and Bt transgenes in Brassica napus and hybridization and introgression with Brassica rapa. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103, 362–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Halfhill, M. D., Millwood, R. J., Weissinger, A. K., Warwick, S. I., and Stewart, C. N., Jr. (2003) Additive transgene expression in multiple GFP transgenic crop x weed hybrid generations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107, 1533–1540.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blumenthal, A., Kuznetzova, L., Edelbaum, O., Raskin, V., Levy, M., and Sela, I. (1999) Measurement of green fluorescent protein in plants: quantification, correlation to expression, rapid screening and differential gene expression. Plant Sci. 142, 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harper, B.K. and Stewart, C.N., Jr. (2000) Patterns of green fluorescent protein expression in transgenic plants. Plant Mol. Bio. Rep. 18, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Woolhouse, H. W. (1967) The nature of senescence in plants. Sym. Soc. Exp. Biol. 21, 179–213.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leffel, S. M., Mabon, S. A., and Stewart, C. N., Jr. (1997) Applications of green fluorescent protein in plants. BioTechniques 23, 912–918.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Niwa, Y., Hirano, T., Yoshimoto, K., Shimizu, M., and Kobayashi, H. (1999). Noninvasive quantitative detection and applications of non-toxic, S65T-type green fluorescent protein in living plants. Plant J. 18, 455–463.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stewart, C. N., Jr. (2001). The utility of green fluorescent protein in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep. 20, 376–382.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Millwood, R. J., Halfhill, M. D., Harkins, D., Russotti, R., and Stewart, C. N., Jr. (2003) Instrumentation and methodology of GFP quantification in intact plant organs. BioTechniques 34, 638–643.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Richards, H. A., Halfhill, M. D., Millwood, R. J., and Stewart, C. N., Jr. (2003) Quantitative GFP fluorescence as an indicator of recombinant protein synthesis in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep. 22, 117–121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew D. Halfhill
    • 1
  • Reginald J. Millwood
    • 1
  • C. Neal StewartJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant SciencesUniversity of TennesseeKnoxville

Personalised recommendations