Characterization of Protein-DNA Association In Vivo by Chromatin Immunoprecipitation

  • Laurent Kuras
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 284)

Abstract

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) is one of the most powerful methods to identify and characterize the association of proteins with specific genomic regions in the context of intact cells. In this method, cells are first treated with formaldehyde to crosslink protein-protein and protein-DNA complexes in situ. Next, the crosslinked chromatin is sheared by sonication to generate small chromatin fragments, and the fragments associated with the protein of interest are immunoprecipitated using antibodies to the protein. Finally, protein-DNA crosslinks are reversed and the DNA is examined for the presence of particular sequences by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Enrichment of specific sequences in the precipitate indicates that the sequences are associated with the protein of interest in vivo. The ChIP method described here is intended for studying protein-DNA association in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but it can be easily implemented in other cell types, including fly, mammalian, and plant cells.

Key Words

Chromatin crosslinking reagents DNA DNA-binding proteins formaldehyde immunoprecipitation polymerase chain reaction protein-DNA interactions yeast 

References

  1. 1.
    Braunstein, M., Rose, A. B., Holmes, S. G., et al. (1993) Transcriptional silencing in yeast is associated with reduced nucleosome acetylation. Genes Dev. 7, 592–604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuo, M. H., Brownell, J. E., Sobel, R. E., et al. (1996) Transcription-linked acetylation by Gcn5p of histones H3 and H4 at specific lysines. Nature 383, 269–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aparicio, O. M., Weinstein, D. M., and Bell, S. P. (1997) Components and dynamics of DNA replication complexes in S. cerevisiae: redistribution of MCM proteins and Cdc45p during S phase. Cell 91, 59–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meluh, P. B. and Koshland, D. (1997) Budding yeast centromere composition and assembly as revealed by in vivo cross-linking. Genes Dev. 11, 3401–3412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Strahl-Bolsinger, S., Hecht, A., Luo, K., and Grunstein, M. (1997) SIR2 and SIR4 interactions differ in core and extended telomeric heterochromatin in yeast. Genes Dev. 11, 83–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tanaka, T., Knapp, D., and Nasmyth, K. (1997) Loading of an Mcm protein onto DNA replication origins is regulated by Cdc6p and CDKs. Cell 90, 649–660.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuras, L. and Struhl, K. (1999) Binding of TBP to promoters in vivo is stimulated by activators and requires Pol II holoenzyme. Nature 399, 609–613.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuras, L., Kosa, P., Mencia, M., and Struhl, K. (2000) TAF-Containing and TAF-independent forms of transcriptionally active TBP in vivo. Science 288, 1244–1248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Solomon, M. J. and Varshavsky, A. (1985) Formaldehyde-mediated DNA-protein crosslinking: a probe for in vivo chromatin structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U S A 82, 6470–6474.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Orlando, V. and Paro, R. (1993) Mapping Polycomb-repressed domains in the bithorax complex using in vivo formaldehyde cross-linked chromatin. Cell 75, 1187–1198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park, J. M., Werner, J., Kim, J. M., et al. (2001) Mediator, not holoenzyme, is directly recruited to the heat shock promoter by HSF upon heat shock. Mol. Cell 8, 9–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boyd, K. E., Wells, J. Gutman, J., et al. (1998) c-Myc target gene specificity is determined by a post-DNAbinding mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 13,887–13,892.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen, H., Lin, R. J., Xie, W., et al. (1999) Regulation of hormone-induced histone hyperacetylation and gene activation via acetylation of an acetylase. Cell 98, 675–686.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Parekh, B. S. and Maniatis, T. (1999) Virus infection leads to localized hyperacetylation of histones H3 and H4 at the IFN-beta promoter. Mol. Cell 3, 125–129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Agalioti, T., Lomvardas, S., Parekh, B., et al. (2000) Ordered recruitment of chromatin modifying and general transcription factors to the IFN-beta promoter. Cell 103, 667–678.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shang, Y., Hu, X., DiRenzo, J., et al. (2000) Cofactor dynamics and sufficiency in estrogen receptor-regulated transcription. Cell 103, 843–852.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frank, S. R. Schroeder, M., Fernandez, P., et al. (2001) Binding of c-Myc to chromatin mediates mitogen-induced acetylation of histone H4 and gene activation. Genes Dev. 15, 2069–2082.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Christova, R. and Oelgeschlager, T. (2002) Association of human TFIID-promoter complexes with silenced mitotic chromatin in vivo. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 79–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johnson, C., Boden, E., Desai, M., et al. (2001) In vivo target promoter-binding activities of a xenobiotic stress-activated TGA factor. Plant J. 28, 237–243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang, H., Tang, W., Zhu, C., and Perry, S. E. (2002) A chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) approach to isolate genes regulated by AGL15, a MADS domain protein that preferentially accumulates in embryos. Plant J. 32, 831–843.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Solomon, M. J., Larsen, P. L., and Varshavsky, A., et al. (1988) Mapping protein-DNA interactions in vivo with formaldehyde: evidence that histone H4 is retained on a highly transcribed gene. Cell 53, 937–947.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Orlando, V., Strutt, H., and Paro, R. (1997) Analysis of chromatin structure by in vivo formaldehyde cross-linking. Methods 11, 205–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sherman, F. (2002) in Methods in Enzymology, “Guide to yeast genetics and molecular and all biology” (Guthrie, C. and Fink, J. R., eds.), 350, pp. 3–41, Academic Press, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Harlow, E. and Lane, D. (1988) Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ren, B., Robert, F., and Wyrick, J. J., et al. (2000) Genome-wide location and function of DNA binding proteins. Science 290, 2306–2309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Iyer, V. R., Horak, C. E., and Scafe, C. S., et al. (2001) Genomic binding sites of the yeast cell-cycle transcription factors SBF and MBF. Nature 409, 533–538.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lieb, J. D., Liu, X., Botstein, D., and Brown, P. O. (2001) Promoter-specific binding of Rap1 revealed by genome-wide maps of protein-DNA association. Nat. Genet. 28, 327–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurent Kuras
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre de Genetique Molecularie, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueGif-sur-YvetteFrance

Personalised recommendations