Skip to main content

Detection of DNA Adducts by 32P-Postlabeling Analysis

  • Protocol
Optimization in Drug Discovery

Abstract

32P-Postlabeling analysis is a powerful technique for the detection, quantification, and identification of DNA adducts induced by mutagens or carcinogens, including large numbers of drugs and their metabolites. The method includes enzymatic digestion of a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sample to the adducted nucleoside 3′-monophosphates and partial purification of the adducted nucleotides, followed by the 5′-labeling with 32P. For analysis of DNA adducts, polyethyleneimine-cellulose thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plates were generally used to resolve 32P-labeled DNA adducts (32P-postlabeling/TLC analysis). However, the procedure detecting DNA adducts using the TLC plate is timeconsuming and labor intensive. To expedite analyses, nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) has recently been adapted for the 32P-postlabeling analysis (32P-postlabeling/PAGE analysis); the detection limit for 5 µg DNA is approx 7 adducts/109 nucleotides, which is similar to that for 32P-postlabeling/TLC. HPLC on-lined with a radioisotope detector system (32P-postlabeling/high-performance liquid chromatography [HPLC] analysis) is also used to increase the resolution and detection limit (approx 3 adducts/1010 nucleotides) of DNA adducts. These three 32P-postlabeling techniques are described for the analysis of DNA adducts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Randerath, K. and Randerath, E. (1993) Postlabeling methods—an historical review. IARC Scientific Publications (Lyon) 124, 3–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anonymous (1993) Postlabeling methods for detection of DNA adducts. IARC Scientific Publications (Lyon) 124, 1–379.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anonymous (1994) DNA adducts: identification and biological significance. IARC Scientific Publications (Lyon) 125, 1–478.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pluim, D., Maliepaard, M., van Waardenburg, R. C., Beijnen, J. H., and Schellens, J. H. (1999) 32P-postlabeling assay for the quantification of the major platinum-DNA adducts. Anal. Biochem. 275, 30–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Reddy, M. V. and Randerath, K. (1987) 32P-analysis of DNA adducts in somatic and reproductive tissues of rats treated with the anticancer antibiotic, mitomycin C. Mutat. Res. 179, 75–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gladek, A. and Liehr, J. G. (1989) Mechanism of genotoxicity of diethylstilbestrol in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 16847–16852.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Han, X., Liehr, J. G., and Bosland, M. C. (1995) Induction of a DNA adduct detectable by 32P-postlabeling in the dorsolateral prostate of NBL/Cr rats treated with estradiol-17 beta and testosterone. Carcinogenesis 16, 951–954.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Seraj, M. J., Umemoto, A., Tanaka, M., Kajikawa, A., Hamada, K., and Monden, Y. (1996) DNA adduct formation by hormonal steroids in vitro. Mutat. Res. 370, 49–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yasui, M., Matsui, S., Santosh Laxmi, Y. R., Suzuki, N., Kim, S. Y., Shibutani, S., et al. (2003) Mutagenic events induced by 4-hydroxyequilin in supF shuttle vector plasmid propagated in human cells. Carcinogenesis 24, 911–917.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shibutani, S., Suzuki, N., Terashima, I., Sugarman, S. M., Grollman, A. P., and Pearl, M. L. (1999) Tamoxifen-DNA adducts detected in the endometrium of women treated with tamoxifen. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 12, 646–653.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shibutani, S., Ravindernath, A., Suzuki, N., Terashima, I., Sugarman, S. M., Grollman, A. P., et al. (2000) Identification of tamoxifen-DNA adducts in the endometrium of women treated with tamoxifen. Carcinogenesis 21, 1461–1467.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stiborová, M., Fernando, R. C., Schmeiser, H. H., Frei, E., Pfau, W., and Wiessler, M. (1994) Characterization of DNA adducts formed by aristolochic acids in the target organ (forestomach) of rats by 32P-postlabeling analysis using different chromatographic procedure. Carcinogenesis 15, 1187–1192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Randerath, K., Reddy, M. V., and Gupta, R. C. (1981) 32P-labeling test for DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 6126–6129.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reddy, M. V. and Randerath, K. (1986) Nuclease P1-mediated enhancement of sensitivity of 32P-postlabeling test for structurally diverse DNA adducts. Carcinogenesis 7, 1543–1551.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Terashima, I., Suzuki, N., and Shibutani, S. (2002) 32P-Postlabeling/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis: application to the detection of DNA adducts. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 15, 305–311.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shibutani, S., Suzuki, N., Santosh Laxmi, Y. R., Schild, L. J., Divi, R. L., Grollman, A. P., et al. (2003) Identification of tamoxifen-DNA adducts in monkeys treated with tamoxifen. Cancer Res. 60, 2607–2610.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Phillips, D. H., Farmer, P. B., Beland, F. A., Nath, R. G., Poirier, M. C., Reddy, M. V., et al. (2000) Methods of DNA adduct determination and their application to testing compounds for genotoxicity. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 35, 222–233.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Terashima, I., Suzuki, N., and Shibutani, S. (1999) Mutagenic potential of α-(N 2-deoxyguanosinyl)tamoxifen lesions, the major DNA adducts detected in endometrial tissues of patients treated with tamoxifen. Cancer Res. 59, 2091–2095.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Santosh Laxmi, Y. R., Suzuki, N., Dasaradhi, L., Johnson, F., and Shibutani, S. (2002) Preparation of oligodeoxynucleotides containing a diastereoisomers of α-(N 2-2′-deoxyguanosinyl)tamoxifen by phosphoramidite chemical synthesis. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 15, 218–225.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cantor, C. R., Warshaw, M. M., and Shapiro, H. (1970) Oligonucleotide interactions: 3. Circular dichroism studies of the conformation of deoxyoligonucleotides. Biopolymers 9, 1059–1077.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zeisig, M., Hofer, T., Cadet, J., and Möller, L. (1999) 32P-postlabeling high-performance liquid chromatography (32P-HPLC) adapted for analysis of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine. Carcinogenesis 20, 1241–1245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Suzuki, N., Prabhu, P.M., Shibutani, S. (2004). Detection of DNA Adducts by 32P-Postlabeling Analysis. In: Yan, Z., Caldwell, G.W. (eds) Optimization in Drug Discovery. Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-800-5:263

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-800-5:263

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-332-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-800-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics