Abstract
Immunoaffinity chromatography offers to the chromatographer the exquisite specificity of the antibody’s complementarity determining regions (CDRs), or hypervariable regions (1,2). These highly selective loops on the antibody surface capture an antigen with high affinity, while having little interaction with impurities that may also be present. When appropriately immobilized, an antibody retains its affinity for its antigen while being held covalently on the chromatographic support. With appropriate wash conditions, 1000-fold or higher impurity clearances are common. With appropriate elution conditions, 90% or more of the activity present in the chromatographic injection may be recovered in the elution peak. And, quite frequently, it is possible to regenerate the immunoaffinity column to allow its use for 100 or more cycles depending on the impurity levels in the injection.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Voet, D. and Voet, J. G. (1995) Biochemistry. Wiley, New York.
Nelson, D. L. and Cox, M. M. (2000) Lehninger: Principles of Biochemistry. Worth, New York.
Scouten, W. H. (1987) A survey of enzyme coupling techniques. Methods in Enzymology 135, 30–65.
Narayanan, S. R. (1994) Preparative affinity chromatography of proteins. J. Chromatogr. 658, 237–258.
Narayanan, S. R., Kakodkar, S. V., and Crane L. J. (1990) “Glutaraldehyde-P,” a stable, Reactive aldehyde matrix for affinitychromaography. Anal. Biochem. 188, 278–284.
Narayanan, S. R., Knochs, S., and Crane L. J. (1990) Preparative affinity chromatography of proteins: influence of the physical properties of the base matrix. J. Chromatogr. 503, 93–102.
Highsmith, F., Regan, T., Clark, D., Drohan, W., and Tharakan, J. (1992) Evaluation of CNBr, FMP, and hydrazide resins for immunoaffinity purification of Factor IX. BioTech. 12, 418–423.
Nakamura, K., Hashimoto, T., Kato, Y., Shimura, K., and Kasai K. (1990) Tresyl-activated support for high-performance affinity chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 510, 101–113.
Cress, M. C. and Ngo, T. T. (1989) Site specific immobilization of immunoglobins. Am. Biotechnol. Lab. 7, 16–19.
Matson, R. S. and Siebert, C. J. (1988) Evaluation of a new N-hydroxysuccinimide activated support for fast flow immunoaffinity chromatography. Prep. Chromatogr. 1, 67–91.
van Sommeren, A. P. G., Machielsen, P. A. G. M., and Gribnau, T. C. J. (1993) Comparison of three activated agaroses for use in affinity chromatography: effects on coupling performance and ligand leakage. J. Chromatogr. 639, 23–31.
Neugebauer, J. M. (1990) Detergents: an overview. Methods in Enzymology 182, 239–253.
Stoll, V. S. and Blanchard, J. S. (1990) Buffers: principles and practice. Methods in Enzymology 182, 239–253.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Humana Press Inc.
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Gallant, S.R. (2004). Immunoaffinity Chromatography of Proteins. In: Aguilar, MI. (eds) HPLC of Peptides and Proteins. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 251. Springer, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-742-4:103
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-742-4:103
Publisher Name: Springer, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-977-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-742-0
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols