Abstract
In vivo footprinting is a technique that enables one to detect protein-DNA interactions as they are occurring in a cell. The principle behind this technique is similar to the principle behind the in vitro footprinting technique: Both rely on the fact that a bound protein often causes its binding site to be protected from cleavage by an endonuclease or from modification by a chemical agent. The major difference between in vivo and in vitro footprinting is that in the first method, cleavage of the DNA molecule is carried out within the nucleus following the in vivo binding of proteins to DNA in the context of chromatin, whereas in the second method, cleavage occurs in the test tube with purified DNA and protein extracts (or purified proteins) that are incubated together. Furthermore, footprints and hypersensitive sites due to deformations of DNA in chromatin are also detected by in vivo footprinting. Hence, compared with data obtained by in vitro footprinting, data obtained by in vivo footprinting may be more significant and representative of the true events that occur in the living cell.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pfiefer, G. P., Stiegerwald, S. D., Mueller, P. R., Wold, B., and Riggs, A. D. (1989) Genomic sequencing and methylation analysis by ligation mediated PCR. Science 246, 810–813.
Mueller, P. R. and Wold, B. (1989) In vivo footprinting of a muscle specific enhancer by ligation mediated PCRai. Science 246, 780–786.
Tormanen, V. T., Swidersky, P. M., Kaplan, B. E., Pfeifer, G. P., and Riggs, A. D. (1992) Extension product capture improves genomic sequencing and DNase I footprinting by ligation-mediated PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 5487–5488.
Warshawsky D. and Miller L (1995) Tissue-specific in vivo protein-DNA interactions at the promoter region of the Xenopus 63 kDa keratin gene during metamorphosis. Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 4502–4509.
Warshawsky, D. and Miller, L. (1997) In vivo footprints are found in the Xenopus 63 kDa keratin gene promoter prior to the appearance of mRNA. Gene 189, 209–212.
Suck, D. and Oefner, C. (1986) Structure of DNase I at 2. 0A resolution suggests a mechanism for binding to and cutting DNA. Nature 321, 620–625.
Hogan, M. E., Robertson, M. W., and Austin, R. H. (1989) DNA flexibility variation may dominate DNase I cleavage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 9273–9277.
Zhang, L. and Gralla, J. D. (1989) In situ nucleoprotein structure at the SV40 major late promoter: melted and wrapped DNA flank the start site. Genes Dev. 3, 1814–1822.
Jackson, R. J. and Benyajati, C. (1992) In vivo stage-and tissue-specific DNA-protein interactions at the D. melanogaster alcohol dehydrogenase distal promoter and adult enhancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 5413–5422.
Van Der Vliet, P. C., and Verrijzer, C. P. (1993) Bending of DNA by transcription factors. BioEssays 15, 25–32.
Drew, H. R. (1984) Structural specificities of five commonly used DNA nucleases. J. Mol. Biol. 176, 535–557.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Humana Press Inc.
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Warshawsky, D., Miller, L. (1999). Mapping Protein-DNA Interactions Using In Vivo Footprinting. In: Guille, M. (eds) Molecular Methods in Developmental Biology. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 127. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-678-9:199
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-678-9:199
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-790-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-678-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols