Abstract
Polytene chromosomes result from subsequent cycles of DNA replication that are not followed by nuclear division. In Drosophila, this occurs in the majority of larval tissues and is most prominent in salivary glands, where up to eleven rounds of replication events may occur. Because the replicated chromatids remain tightly aligned, this process leads to pairing of up to 2048 DNA strands, giving rise to a highly reproducible banding pattern (1). This exceptional structure allows cytological analysis of genes and their associated proteins with a relatively high resolution. Up to 5000 condensed bands separated by less condensed interband chromatin regions can be well resolved with electron microscopy, whereas conventional optical microscopy techniques allow about 1000 bands and interbands to be distinguished. Because the size of Drosophila genomic euchromatin is about 120 Mb, the level of resolution on a linear scale is in the order of 10–50 kilobases (kb), depending on the local degree of condensation of the chromosomal region of interest. Therefore, polytene chromosomes represent a formidable tool for cytological analysis of biological processes. Moreover, polytene chromosome assays can be readily implemented in most laboratories, because they require only standard transmission and fluorescence microscopy equipment and reagents and do not demand great technical expertise.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ashburner, M. (1989) Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
Franke, A., Decamillis, M., Zink, D., Cheng, N. S., Brock, H. W., and Paro, R. (1992) Polycomb and polyhomeotic are constituents of a multimeric protein complex in chromatin of Drosophila-Melanogaster. EMBO J. 11, 2941–2950.
Rastelli, L., Chan, C. S., and Pirrotta, V. (1993) Related chromosome binding sites for zeste, suppressors of zeste and Polycomb group proteins in Drosophila and their dependence on Enhancer of zeste function. EMBO J. 12, 1513–1522.
Platero, J. S., Hartnett, T., and Eissenberg, J. C. (1995) Functional analysis of the chromodomain of HP1. EMBO J. 14, 3977–3986.
Platero, J. S., Sharp, E. J., Adler, P. N., and Eissenberg, J. C. (1996) In vivo assay for protein-protein interactions using Drosophila chromosomes. Chromosoma 104, 393–404.
Weeks, J. R., Hardin, S. E., Shen, J., Lee, J. M., and Greenleaf, A. L. (1993) Locus-specific variation in phosphorylation state of RNA polymerase II in vivo: correlations with gene activity and transcript processing. Genes Dev. 7, 2329–2344.
Nowak, S. J. and Corces, V. G. (2000) Phosphorylation of histone H3 correlates with transcriptionally active loci. Genes Dev. 14, 3003–3013.
Zink, D. and Paro, R. (1995) Drosophila Polycomb-group regulated chromatin inhibits the accessibility of a trans-activator to its target DNA. EMBO J. 14, 5660–5671.
Cavalli, G. and Paro, R. (1999) Epigenetic inheritance of active chromatin after removal of the main transactivator. Science 286, 955–958.
Richter, L., Bone, J. R., and Kuroda, M. I. (1996) RNA-dependent association of the Drosophila maleless protein with the male X chromosome. Genes Cells 1, 325–336.
Egyhazi, E., Ossoinak, A., Pigon, A., Holmgren, C., Lee, J. M., and Greenleaf, A. L. (1996) Phosphorylation dependence of the initiation of productive transcription of Balbiani ring 2 genes in living cells. Chromosoma 104, 422–433.
Zink, B., Engström, Y., Gehring, W. J., and Paro, R. (1991) Direct interaction of the Polycomb protein with Antennapedia regulatory sequences in polytene chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J. 10, 153–162.
Chan, C. S., Rastelli, L., and Pirrotta, V. (1994) A Polycomb response element in the Ubx gene that determines an epigenetically inherited state of repression. EMBO J. 13, 2553–2564.
Rozovskaia, T., Tillib, S., Smith, S., et al. (1999) Trithorax and ASH1 interact directly and associate with the trithorax group-responsive bxd region of the Ultrabithorax promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 6441–6447.
Tsukiyama, T., Becker, P. B., and Wu, C. (1994) ATP-Dependent nucleosome disruption at a heat-shock promoter mediated by binding of GAGA transcription factor. Nature 367, 525–532.
Gerasimova, T. I. and Corces, V. G. (1998) Polycomb and trithorax group proteins mediate the function of a chromatin insulator. Cell 92, 511–521.
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
Gyurkovics, H., Gausz, J., Kummer, J., and Karch, F. (1990) A new homeotic mutation in the Drosophila bithorax complex removes a boundary separating two domains of regulation. EMBO J. 9, 2579–2585.
Strutt, H. and Paro, R. (1997) The Polycomb group protein of Drosophila melanogaster has different compositions at different target sites. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 6773–6783.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Lavrov, S., Déjardin, J., Cavalli, G. (2004). Combined Immunostaining and FISH Analysis of Polytene Chromosomes. In: Henderson, D.S. (eds) Drosophila Cytogenetics Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 247. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-665-7:289
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-665-7:289
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-050-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-665-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols