Protein-Protein Interactions

  • Graziella Pedrazzi
  • Igor Stagljar
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 241)


Most proteins need to interact physically with other proteins to be able to perform their biological functions; the identification of new protein-binding partners for a protein of interest may therefore be a key strategy in defining the mechanism of action for a particular protein. Many different approaches to studying protein-protein interactions exist, but identifying which interactions are biologically significant is not trivial. Thus, once an interaction is found, the first step is to validate the suggested interactions using genetic, biochemical, and cell-biological approaches. Here we will focus on three complementary protein interaction approaches: (a) the yeast two-hybrid (YTH) system, a genetic assay performed in living yeast cells, which can be used both to identify proteins that bind to a protein of interest and to determine domains or residues critical for an interaction; and two biochemical approaches, (b) the coimmunoprecipitation of interacting proteins with a specific antibody; and (c) the far-Western method that can show direct physical interaction of two proteins.


Activation Domain ADH1 Promoter Bait Plasmid GAL4 Activation Domain Prey Plasmid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Pedrazzi, G., Perrera, C., Blaser, H., et al. (2001) Direct association of Bloom’s syndrome gene product with the human mismatch repair protein MLH1. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 4378–4386.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sambrook, J. and Russell, D. W. (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bartel, P. L., Chien, C.-T., Sternglanz, R., and Fields, S. (1993) Using the two-hybrid system to detect protein-protein interactions, in: Cellular Interactions in Development: A Practical Approach (Hartley, D. A., ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, pp. 153–179.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Toby, G. G. and Golemis, E. A. (2001) Using the yeast interaction trap and other two-hybrid-based approaches to study protein-protein interactions. Methods. 24, 201–217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Walhout, A. J., Boulton, S. J., and Vidal, M. (2000) Yeast two-hybrid systems and protein interaction mapping projects for yeast and worm. Yeast. 17, 88–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Durfee, T., Becherer, K., Chen, P.-L., et al. (1993) The retinoblastoma protein associates with the protein phosphatase type 1 catalytic subunit. Genes Dev. 7, 555–569.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gavin, A. C., Bosche, M., Krause R., et al. (2002) Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature. 415, 141–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ho, Y., Gruhler, A., Heilbut, A. et al. (2002) Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature. 415, 180–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stagljar, I., Bourquin, J.-P., and Schaffner, W. (1996) Use of the two-hybrid system and random sonicated DNA to identify the interaction domain of a protein. BioTechniques. 21, 430–432.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graziella Pedrazzi
    • 1
  • Igor Stagljar
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Veterinary Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyUniversity of Zürich-IrchelZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations