Micropropagation of Strawberry via Axillary Shoot Proliferation

  • Philippe Boxus
Part of the Methods In Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 111)

Abstract

Elite strawberry plants can only be multiplied by a vegetative method. This explains the great dissemination of parasites, such as viruses, mycoplasmas, nematodes, soil fungi, and tarsonems, which are transmitted directly or indirectly to the descendants. The impossibility of efficiently fighting against such parasites, the introduction of nonresistant cultivars, and international trade have rendered the problem more and more acute. However, most strawberry-producing countries have drawn up a program of certification that takes these various parasites into account.

Keywords

Sugar Hydrolysis Phenol Agar Cage 

References

  1. 1.
    Boxus, Ph (1974) The production of strawberry plants by in vitro micropropagation J Hort Sci 49,209–210Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Westphalen, H. J. and Billen, W. (1976) Erzugung von Erdbeerpflanzen in grossen Mengen durch Sprosspitzenkultur. Erwerbsobstbau 18,49, 50.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swartz, H. J and Lindstrom, J. T. (1986) Small fruit and grape tissue culture from 1980 to 1985 Commercialization of the technique, in Tissue Culture as a Plant Production System for Horticultural Crops (Zimmerman, R H., Gnesbach, R. J, Hammerschlag, F. A, and Lawson, R H, eds ), Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 201–220.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Damiano, C. (1980) Strawberry micropropagation, in Proceedings of the Conference on Nursery Production of Fruit Plant Through Tissue Culture Applications and Feasibility. USDA-SEA, Agricultural Research Results, ARR-NE. Beltsville, MD,pp 11–22.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boxus, Ph. (1985) Comportement du fraisier issu de micropropagation in vitro. Fruit Beige 410, 106–110.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Navatel, J. C, Varachaud, G., Roudeillac, P., and Bardet, A. (1986) Multiplication in vitro comportement agronomique de plants de fraisiers issus de piedsmerès produits par micropropagation par rapport au matériel classique. Synthèse de trois années d’expérimentation. Infos-CTIFL 21, 2–8.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dijkstra, J (1988) Samenvatting onderzoekresultaten vollegrondsaardbeien (1987) Internal Report (personal communication)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jemmali, A, Boxus, Ph., and Kinet, J M (1992) Are strawberry arising from adventitious stipule buds also true to type? Acta Hort. 319, 171–176.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jemmali, A, Boxus, Ph., Kevers, CI, and Gaspar, Th (1995) Carry-over of morphological and biochemical characteristics associated with hyperflowenng of micropropagated strawberries J Plant Physiol 147,435–440Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    d’Amato, F (1977) Cytogenetics of differentiation in tissue and cell cultures, in Applied and Fundamental Aspects of Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (Reinert, J and Bajaj, Y. P. S., eds), Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 344–357.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jemmali, A, Robbe, A., and Boxus, Ph (1997) Histochemical events and other fundamental differences between axillary and adventitious stipular shoots in micropropagated strawberry Third Intern Strawberry Symposium, Veldhoven (The Netherlands) Acta Hort 439,341–345Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knop, W. (1965) Quantitative Untersuchungen uber die Emahrungsprozesse der Pflanzen Landwirstsch Vers Stn 7, 93–107Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Murashige, T and Skoog, F. (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15,473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe Boxus
    • 1
  1. 1.Biotechnology DepartmentAgricultural Research CentreGemblouxBelgium

Personalised recommendations