Advertisement

Biochemical Methods for the Analysis of Tissue-Engineered Cartilage

  • Wáel Kafienah
  • Trevor J. Sims
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 238)

Abstract

There have been significant advances in cartilage-engineering methodology in recent years, particularly in the production of biodegradable scaffolds and the use of bioreactors to improve the outcome of the engineering process. To date, engineered cartilage studies have mostly relied on histochemical and immunohistochemical methods for the characterization of the engineered cartilage matrix. The detection of various matrix components using these methods may not be sufficient to judge the quality of engineered cartilage and compare it objectively to natural cartilage. In order for cartilage tissue engineering to progress to the clinic, quantitative methods for the analysis of different matrix components will be required to monitor and ensure the quality of engineered cartilage.

Keywords

Cartilage Tissue Engineering Organic Mixture Engineer Cartilage Sodium Acetate Trihydrate Multichannel Pipet 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Hollander, A. P. (2001) Collagen degradation assays. Methods Mol. Biol. 151, 473–484.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Handley, C. J. and Buttle, D. J. (1995) Assay of proteoglycan degradation. Methods Enzymol. 248, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hollander, A. P., Heathfield, T. F., Webber, C., Iwata, Y., Bourne, R., Rorabeck, C., and Poole, A. R. (1994) Increased damage to type II collagen in osteoarthritic articular cartilage detected by a new immunoassay. J. Clin. Investig. 93, 1722–1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Creemers, L. B., Jansen, D. C., van Veen-Reurings, A., van den Bos, T., and Everts, V. (1997) Microassay for the assessment of low levels of hydroxyproline. Biotechniques 22, 656–658.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Knott, L. and Bailey, A. J. (1998) Collagen cross-links in mineralizing tissues: A review of their chemistry, function, and clinical relevance. Bone 22, 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Black, D., Duncan, A., and Robins, S. P. (1988) Quantitative analysis of the pyridinium crosslinks of collagen in urine using ion-paired reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Biochem. 169, 197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sims, T. J. and Bailey, A. J. (1992) Quantitative analysis of collagen and elastin cross-links using a single-column system. J. Chromatogr. 582, 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grant, R. A. (1964) Application of the auto-analyser to connective tissue analysis. Clinical Pathology 17, 685–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sims, T. J., Avery, N. C., and Bailey, A. J., eds. (2000) Quantitative determination of collagen crosslinks. Extracellular Matrix Protocols (Streuli, C. and Grant, M., eds.), Humana Press: Totowa, NJ.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wáel Kafienah
    • 1
  • Trevor J. Sims
    • 1
  1. 1.Academic Rheumatology, Southmead HospitalUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations