Abstract
Random Chimeragenesis on Transient Templates (RACHITT) has been used to create libraries averaging 12 (1) or even 19 (L. Encell, unpublished) crossovers per gene in a single round of gene family shuffling. RACHITT creates chimeric genes by aligning parental gene “donor” fragments on a full-length DNA template (1). The heteroduplexed top strand fragments are stabilized on the template by a single, long annealing step, taking advantage of full length binding by each fragment, rather than the binding of smaller overlaps, and by carrying out reactions at relatively high ionic strength. Fragments containing unannealed 5′ or 3′-termini are incorporated after flap trimming using the endo and exonucleolytic activities of Taq DNA polymerase and Pfu polymerase, respectively. After gap filling and ligation, the template, which was synthesized with uracils in place of thymidine, is rendered non-amplifiable by uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) treatment. Other methods of DNA shuffling by gene fragmentation and reassembly can result in reconstitution of one or all of the parental genes at unacceptably high frequencies in the final shuffled library (2–4). Libraries with limited diversity owing to low numbers of crossovers can also result (3,5,6). Both of these problems result because the hybridization of perfectly matching top and bottom strand fragments from the same gene are preferred over the heteroduplex hybridizations that lead to crossovers between genes (3).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Coco, W. M., Levinson, W. E., Crist, M. J., et al. (2001) DNA shuffling method for generating highly recombined genes and evolved enzymes. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 354–359.
Kikuchi, M., Ohnishi, K., and Harayama, S. (1999) Novel family shuffling methods for the in vitro evolution of enzymes. Gene 236, 159–167.
Moore, G. L., Maranas, C. D., Lutz, S., and Benkovic, S. J. (2001) Predicting crossover generation in DNA shuffling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3226–3231.
Joern, J. M., Meinhold, P., and Arnold, F. H. (2002) Analysis of shuffled gene libraries. J. Mol. Biol. 316, 643–656.
Kikuchi, M., Ohnishi, K., and Harayama, S. (2000) An effective family shuffling method using single-stranded DNA. Gene 243, 133–137.
Hansson, L. O., Bolton-Grob, R., Massoud, T., and Mannervik, B. (1999) Evolution of differential substrate specificities in Mu class glutathione transferases probed by DNA shuffling. J. Mol. Biol. 287, 265–276.
Voigt, C. A., Mayo, S. L., Arnold, F. H., and Wang, Z. G. (2001) Computational method to reduce the search space for directed protein evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3778–3783.
Voigt, C. A., Kauffman, S., and Wang, Z. G. (2001) Rational evolutionary design: the theory of in vitro protein evolution. Adv. Protein Chem. 55, 79–160.
Kurtzman, A. L., Govindarajan, S., Vahle, K., Jones, J. T., Heinrichs, V., and Patten, P. A. (2001) Advances in directed protein evolution by recursive genetic recombination: applications to therapeutic proteins. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12, 361–370.
Slupphaug, G., Alseth, I., Eftedal, I., Volden, G., and Krokan, H. E. (1993) Low incorporation of dUMP by some thermostable DNA polymerases may limit their use in PCR amplifications. Anal. Biochem. 211, 164–169.
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning, Second Edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Coco, W.M. (2003). RACHITT. In: Arnold, F.H., Georgiou, G. (eds) Directed Evolution Library Creation. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 231. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-395-X:111
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-395-X:111
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-285-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-395-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols