Place Conditioning to Study Drug Reward and Aversion

  • William A. CarlezonJr.
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMM, volume 84)

Abstract

Place conditioning is a classical conditioning paradigm in which animals (typically rats or mice) learn to associate the effects of a drug (or other discrete treatment) with a particular environment. Although it is often referred to as the “Conditioned Place Preference (CPP)” paradigm, this designation fails to capture the flexibility of the assay: it identifies both conditioned place preferences and conditioned place aversions, and thus it can be used to study both rewarding drug effects and aversive drug effects. There are several comprehensive place conditioning reviews in which methodology is described, results are summarized, and the theoretical underpinnings of the behavior are discussed (1, 2, 3). The purpose of this chapter is to describe methodology that, at least in rats, minimizes training time and maximizes the sensitivity of the assay to reward, diminished reward (anhedonia), and aversion. As such, place conditioning can be used as a relatively high-throughput assay to study addiction (4, 5, 6, 7) and other neuropsychiatric disorders involving brain reward systems, including depression (8,9).

Keywords

Depression Cage Morphine Syringe Isopropyl Alcohol 

References

  1. 1.
    Carr, G. D., Fibiger, H. C., and Phillips, A. G. (1989) Conditioned place preference as a measure of drug reward, in The Neuropharmacological Basis of Reward, (Liebman, J. M. and Cooper, S. J., eds.) Clarendon, Oxford, U.K., pp. 264–319.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wise, R. A. (1989) The brain and reward, in The Neuropharmacological Basis of Reward (Liebman, J. M. and Cooper, S. J., eds.) Clarendon, Oxford, U.K., pp. 377–424.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tzschentke, T. M. (1998) Measuring reward with the place preference paradigm: a comprehensive review of drug effects, recent progress, and new issues. Progr. Neurobiol. 56, 613–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carlezon, W. A. Jr., Boundy, V. A., Haile, C.N., Lane, S. B., Kalb, R. G., Neve, R. L., and Nestler, E. J. (1997) Sensitization to morphine induced by viral-mediated gene transfer. Science 277, 812–814.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carlezon, W. A. Jr., Thome, J., Olson, V., Lane-Ladd, S. B., Brodkin, E. S., Hiroi, N., et al. (1998) Regulation of Cocaine Reward by CREB. Science 282, 2272–2275.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kelz, M. B., Chen, J. S., Carlezon, W. A. Jr., Whisler, K., Gilden, L., Steffen, C., et al. (1999) Expression of the transcription factor ΔFosB in the brain controls sensitivity to cocaine. Nature 401, 272–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carlezon, W. A., Jr., Haile, C. N., Coopersmith, R., Hayashi, Y., Malinow, R., Neve, R. L., and Nestler, E. J. (2000) Distinct sites of opiate reward and aversion within the midbrain identified by a herpes simplex virus vector expressing GluR1. J. Neurosci. 20, RC62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pliakas, A.M., Carlson, R., Neve, R. L., Konradi, C., Nestler, E. J., and Carlezon, W. A. Jr. (2001) Altered responsiveness to cocaine and increased immobility in the forced swim test associated with elevated cAMP response element binding protein expression in nucleus accumbens. J. Neurosci. 21, 7397–7403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Andersen, S. L., Arvanitogiannis, A., Pliakas, A. M., LeBlanc, C., and Carlezon, W. A. Jr. (2002) Altered responsiveness to cocaine in rats exposed to methylphenidate during early development. Nature Neurosci. 5, 13–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gracy, K. N., Dankiewicz, L. A., and Koob, G. F. (2000) Opiate withdrawal-induced Fos immunoreactivity in the rat extended amygdala parallels the development of condtioned place aversion. Neuropsychopharmacol. 24, 152–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • William A. CarlezonJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Behavioral Genetics Laboratory, McLean HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBelmont

Personalised recommendations