Peptide Mass Fingerprinting Using MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

  • Darryl J. C. Pappin
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 211)


Large-format 2D gel electrophoresis systems in routine operation are capable of resolving several thousand cellular proteins in 1 or 2 d (1,2). For the last decade, a combination of Edman microsequence analysis and identification of proteins by staining with specific antibodies has been used to systematically identify proteins and establish cellular databases (3, 4, 5). There are, however, significant problems associated with these approaches. Most proteins are only present in the low-to upper-femtomole range, which is significantly below the level at which automated sequencers can reliably operate (6,7). The relatively slow speed of the Edman process also means that the number of proteins is too great to permit large-scale characterization within any useful period of time. The use of monoclonal antibodies, while both rapid and sensitive, requires the ready availability of a large pool of specific antibody probes.


Thionyl Chloride MALDI Mass Spectrometry Ethyl Formate Edman Process Octyl Glucoside 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    O’Farrell, P. (1975) High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 250, 4007–4021.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Patton, W. F., Pluskal, M. G., Skea, W. M., et al. (1990) Development of a dedicated two-dimensional gel electrophoresis system that provides optimal pattern reproducibility and polypeptide resolution. Biotechniques 8, 518–527.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Celis, J. E., Gesser, B., Rasmussen, H. H., et al. (1990) Comprehensive two-dimensional gel protein databases offer a global approach to the analysis of human cells: the transformed amnion cells (AMA) master database and its link to genome DNA sequence analysis. Electrophoresis 11, 989–1071.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garrels, J. and Franza, B. (1989) The REF52 protein database: methods of database construction and analysis using the QUEST system and characterization of protein patterns from proliferating and quiescent REF52 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 5283–5298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rasmussen, H. H., Van Damme, J., Bauw, G., et al. (1991) Protein electroblotting and microsequencing in establishing integrated human protein databases, in Methods in Protein Sequence Analysis (Jornvall, H., Hoog, J. O., and Gustavsson, A. M., eds.), Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp. 103–114.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hewick, R. M., Hunkapiller, M. W., Hood, L. E., and Dreyer, W. J. (1981) A gas-liquid solid phase peptide and protein sequenator. J. Biol. Chem. 256, 7990–7997.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Totty, N. F., Waterfield, M. D., and Hsuan, J. J. (1992) Accelerated high-sensitivity microsequencing of proteins and peptides using a miniature reaction cartridge. Protein Sci. 1, 1215–1224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Henzel, W. J., Billeci, T. M., Stults, J. T., et al. (1993) Identifying proteins from 2-dimensional gels by molecular mass searching of peptide-fragments in protein-sequence databases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 5011–5015.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pappin, D. J. C., Hojrup, P., and Bleasby, A. J. (1993) Rapid identification of proteins by peptide-mass fingerprinting. Curr. Biol. 3, 327–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mann, M., Hojrup, P., and Roepstorff, P. (1993) Use of mass-spectrometric molecular-weight information to identify proteins in sequence databases. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 22, 338–345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yates, J. R., Speicher, S., Griffin, P. R., and Hunkapiller, T. (1993) Peptide mass maps-a highly informative approach to protein identification. Anal. Biochem. 214, 397–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    James, P., Quadroni, M., Carafoli, E., and Gonnet, G. (1993) Protein identification by mass profile fingerprinting. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 195, 58–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aebersold, R. H., Leavitt, J., Saavedra, R. A., et al. (1987) Internal amino acid sequence analysis of proteins separated by one-or two-dimensional gel electrophoresis after in situ protease digestion on nitrocellulose. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 6970–6974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bauw, G., Van Damme, J., Puype, M., et al. (1989) Protein electroblotting and microsequencing strategies in generating protein databases from two-dimensional gels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 7701–7705.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fernandez, J., DeMott, M., Atherton, D., and Mische, S. M. (1992) Internal protein sequence analysis: enzymatic digestion for less than 10 micrograms of protein bound to polyvinylidene difluoride or nitrocellulose membranes. Anal. Biochem. 201, 255–264.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fernandez, J., Andrews, L., and Mische, S. M. (1994) An improved procedure for enzymatic digestion of polyvinylidene difluoride-bound proteins for internal sequence-analysis. Anal. Biochem. 218, 112–117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Patterson, S. D. and Aebersold, R. (1995) Mass-spectrometric approaches for the identification of gel-separated proteins. Electrophoresis 16, 1791–1814.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Coull, J. M. and Pappin, D. J. C. (1990) A rapid fluorescent staining procedure for proteins electroblotted onto PVDF membranes. J. Protein Chem. 9, 259,260.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darryl J. C. Pappin
    • 1
  1. 1.Imperial CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations