Skip to main content

Representational Difference Analysis of Gene Expression

  • Protocol
Tumor Suppressor Genes

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology™ ((MIMB,volume 222))

  • 888 Accesses

Abstract

The technique of representational difference analysis (RDA) allows the selective amplification of DNA fragments that differ greatly in abundance between two samples. The method was originally developed by Lisitsyn and co-workers for detecting differences between complex genomes (1), and has been used to identify genomic deletions (including putative tumor suppressor genes), genomic amplifications, genetic polymorphisms, and viral insertions (2). RDA was later adapted for application to cDNA by Hubank and Schatz (3), and like other techniques for the comparative analysis of gene expression, including microarray hybridization (4), differential display (5), and serial analysis of gene expression (6), RDA has been used to identify genes deregulated in cancers and cancer cell lines (79). Some major advantages of RDA relative to other approaches include the potential for identifying novel or rare transcripts that differ greatly in expression between two samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lisitsyn, N., Lisitsyn, N., and Wigler, M. (1993) Cloning the differences between two complex genomes. Science 259, 946–951.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lisitsyn, N. A. (1995) Representational difference analysis: finding the differences between genomes. Trends Genet. 11, 303–307.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hubank, M. and Schatz, D. G. (1994) Identifying differences in mRNA expression by representational difference analysis of cDNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 5640–5648.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schena, M., Shalon, D., Davis, R. W., and Brown, P. O. (1995) Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 270, 467–470.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liang, P. and Pardee, A. B. (1995) Recent advances in differential display. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 7, 274–280.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Velculescu, V. E., Zhang, L., Vogelstein, B., and Kinzler, K. W. (1995) Serial analysis of gene expression. Science 270, 484–487.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ismail, R. S., Baldwin, R. L., Fang, J., et al. (2000) Differential gene expression between normal and tumor-derived ovarian epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 60, 6744–6749.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Graveel, C. R., Jatkoe, T., Madore, S. J., Holt, A. L., and Farnham, P. J. (2001) Expression profiling and identification of novel genes in hepatocellular carcinomas. Oncogene 20, 2704–2712.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Welford, S. M., Gregg, J., Chen, E., et al. (1998) Detection of differentially expressed genes in primary tumor tissues using representational differences analysis coupled to microarray hybridization. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 3059–3065.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hubank, M. and Schatz, D. G. (1999) cDNA representational difference analysis: a sensitive and flexible method for identification of differentially expressed genes. Meth. Enzymol. 303, 325–349.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Neill, M. J. and Sinclair, A. H. (1997) Isolation of rare transcripts by representational difference analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 2681–2682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pastorian, K., Hawel, L., and Byus, C. V. (2000) Optimization of cDNA representational difference analysis for the identification of differentially expressed mRNAs. Anal. Biochem. 283, 89–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Geng, M., Wallrapp, C., Muller-Pillasch, F, Frohme, M., Hoheisel, J. D., and Gress, T. M. (1998) Isolation of differentially expressed genes by combining representational difference analysis (RDA) and cDNA library arrays. Biotechniques 25, 434–438.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, S., Zeller, K., Dang, C. V., Sandgren, E. P., and Lee, L. A. (2001) A strategy to identify differentially expressed genes using representational difference analysis and cDNA arrays. Anal. Biochem. 288, 141–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wallrapp, C., Muller-Pillasch, F., Micha, A., et al. (1999) Strategies for the detection of disease genes in pancreatic cancer. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 880, 122–146.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Humana Press Inc.

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Bugni, J.M., Drinkwater, N.R. (2003). Representational Difference Analysis of Gene Expression. In: El-Deiry, W.S. (eds) Tumor Suppressor Genes. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 222. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-328-3:385

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-328-3:385

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-986-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-328-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics