Conjugation of Colloidal Gold to Proteins

  • Constance Oliver
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 115)

Abstract

The ability to conjugate proteins to colloidal gold sols provides a wide variety of probes for electron microscopy. In addition to antibodies, protein A, lectins, enzymes, toxins, and other proteins have all been conjugated to colloidal gold (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). The nature of the interaction between the colloidal gold and the protein is poorly understood. Colloidal gold is a negatively charged lyophobic sol. The surface of the particle displays not only electrostatic characteristics, but also hydrophobic properties. In conjugating proteins to a gold sol, the electrostatic interactions must be reduced so that the hydrophobic interactions can prevail. This is accomplished by adjusting the pH of the gold sol to approx 0.5 pH unit higher than the pI of the protein being conjugated. Roth (7) gives a table of optimum pH for a number of commonly used proteins. Once the pH is properly adjusted, the net charge of the protein is zero or slightly negative. This prevents the aggregation of the protein owing to electrostatic attraction while maintaining the hydrophobic interactions and facilitates the conjugation of the protein to the gold.

Keywords

H2O2 Magnesium Glycerol Polyethylene Glycol 

References

  1. 1.
    Leunissen, J. L. M., and DeMey, J. R. (1989) Preparation of gold probes, in Immuno-gold Labeling in Cell Biology (Verkleij, A. J. and Leunissen, J. L. M., eds.), CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bendayan, M. (1984) Protein A-gold electron microscopic immunocytochemistry: methods, applications, and limitations. J. Electron Micros. Technol. 1, 243–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bendayan, M. (1989) Protein A-gold and protein G-gold postembedding immuno-electron microscopy, in Colloidal Gold, vol. 1 (Hayat, M. A., ed.), Academic, New York, pp. 34–96.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Horisberger, M. (1981) Colloidal gold: a cytochemical marker for light and fluorescent microscopy and for transmission and scanning electron microscopy, in Scanning Electron Microscopy II (Johari, O., ed.), SEM, Inc., AMF O’Hare, Chicago, pp. 9–31.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Horisberger, M. (1989) Quantitative aspects of labeling colloidal gold with proteins, in Immuno-gold Labeling in Cell Biology (Verkleij, A. J. and Leunissen, J. L. M., eds.), CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 49–60.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geoghegan, W. D. and Ackerman, G. A. (1977) Adsorption of horseradish peroxidase, ovomucoid and anti-immunoglobulin to colloidal gold for the indirect detection of concanavalin A, wheat germ agglutinin and goat anti-human immuno-globulin G on cell surfaces at the electron microscopic level: a new method, theory and application. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 25, 1187–1200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roth, J. (1983) The colloidal gold marker system for light and electron microscopic cytochemistry, in Techniques in Immunocytochemistry, vol. 2 (Bullock, G. R. and Petrusz, P., eds.), Academic, New York, pp. 217–284.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Birrell, G. B., Hedberg, K. K., and Griffith, P. H. (1987) Pitfalls of immunogold labeling: analysis by light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and photoelectron microscopy. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 35, 843–853.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Constance Oliver
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of the Navy Office of Naval ResearchArlington

Personalised recommendations