Advertisement

Indirect Immunofluorescent Labeling of Fixed Cells

  • Robert E. Cunningham
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 115)

Abstract

One of the major advantages of flow cytometry is the simultaneous evaluation of multiple markers, especially surface markers (1). The detection of intracellular proteins is less well developed, in large part because antibodies can bind nonspecifically to dying cells and dead cell components, which leads to considerable biological noise in the fluorescence detectors. There is also noise caused by the intra- and/or intermolecular ionic interactions during the process of fixation, which reduces the ability to detect the desired protein(s) both intracellularly and extracellularly. This is a double edged sword for labeling cells. It is very important to start the staining procedure with a viable cell suspension. If the starting material is viable, at least one of the two problems associated with cell fixation and staining is remedied. The fixation protocols are varied not only for their uses of crosslinking agents, permeabilization agents, and/or precipitating agents, but also for time and temperature. This chapter includes protocols for surface staining followed by fixation/permeabilization for DNA staining, fixation/permeabilization followed by surface staining, and fixation/ permeabilization followed by intracellular staining.

Keywords

Propidium Iodide Propidium Iodide Crosslinking Agent Surface Staining Primary Monoclonal Antibody 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Vyth-Dreese, F. A., Kipp, J. B. A., and DeJohn, T. A. M. (1980) Simultaneous measurement of surface immunoglobulins and cell cycle phase of human lymphocytes, in Flow Cytometry IV (Laerum, O. D., Lindo, T., and Thorn, E., eds.), Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, pp. 207–212.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Labalette-Houache, M., Torpier, G., Capron, A., and Dessaint, J. P. (1991) Improved permeabilization procedure for flow cytometric detection of internal antigens. Analysis of interleukin-2 production. J. Immunol. Methods 138,143–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pollice, A. A., McCoy, J. P., Jr., Shackney, S. E., Smith, C. A., Agarwal, J., Burholt, D. R., Janocko, L. E., Hornicek, F. J., Singh, S. G., and Hartsock, R. J. (1992) Sequential paraformaldehyde and methanol fixation for simultaneous flow cytometric analysis of DNA, cell-surface proteins, and intracellular proteins. Cytometry 13, 432–444.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schmid, I., Uittengobaart, C. H., and Giogi, J. V. (1991) A gentle fixation and permeabilization method for combined cell-surface and intracellular staining with improved precision in DNA quantification. Cytometry 12, 279–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert E. Cunningham
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cellular Pathology Armed ForcesInstitute of PathologyWashington

Personalised recommendations