Abstract
To further our understanding of genomic imprinting it will be essential to identify key control elements, and to investigate their regulation by both epigenetic modifications (such as DNA methylation) and trans-acting factors. So far, sequence elements that regulate parental allele-specific gene expression have been identified in a number of imprinted loci, either because of their differential DNA methylation or through functional studies in transgenic mice (1,2). A systematic search for allele-specific chromatin features constitutes an alternative strategy to identify elements that regulate imprinting. The validity of such an in vivo chromatin approach derives from the fact that in several known imprinting control-elements, a specialized organization of chromatin characterized by nuclease hypersensitivity is present on only one of the two parental chromosome (3). For example, the differentially methylated 5′-portion of the human SNRPN gene-a sequence element that controls imprinting in the Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes’ domain on chromosome 15q11-q13-has strong DNase-I hypersensitive sites on the unmethylated paternal chromosome (4). A differentially methylated region that regulates the imprinting of H19 and that of the neighboring insulin-like growth factor-2 gene on mouse chromosome 7 was also found to have parental chromosomespecific hypersensitive sites (5,6). The precise nature of the allelic nuclease hypersensitivity in these and other imprinted loci remains to be determined in more detail, for example, by applying complementary chromatin methodologies (7,8). However, it is comMonly observed that a nuclease hypersensitive site corresponds to a small region where nucleosomes are absent or partially disrupted.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Constáncia, M., Pickard, B., Kelsey, G., and Reik, W. (1998) Imprinting mechanisms. Genet. Res. 8, 881–900.
Brannan, C. I. and Bartolomei, M. S. (1999) Mechanisms of genomic imprinting. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 164–1
Feil, R. and Khosla, S. (1999) Genomic imprinting in mamMals: an interplay between chromatin and DNA methylation? Trends Genet. 15, 431–435.
Schweizer, J., Zynger, D., and Francke, U. (1999) In vivo nuclease hypersensitivity studies reveal multiple sites of parental-origin-dependent differential chromatin conformation in the 150 kb SNRPN transcription unit. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 555–5
Hark, A. T. and Tilghman, S. M. (1998) Chromatin conformation of the H19 epigenetic mark. Hum. Mol. Genet. 7, 1979–19
Khosla, S., Aitchison, A., Gregory, R., Allen, N. D., and Feil, R. (1999) Parental allele-specific chromatin configuration in a boundary-imprinting-control element upstream of the mouse H19 gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 2556–25
Zaret, K. S. (1997) In vivo footprinting analysis of protein-nucleic acid interactions. Methods 11, 149–2
Szabó, P. E., Pfeifer, G. P., and Mann, J. R. (1998) Characterization of novel parent-specific epigenetic modifications upstream of the imprinted H19 gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 6767–67
Weintraub, H. and Groudine, M. (1976) Chromosomal subunits in active genes have an altered conformation. Science 193, 848–8
Gross, D. S. and Garrard, W. T. (1988) Nuclease hypersensitive sites in chromatin. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 57, 159–1
Boyes, J. and Felsenfeld, G. (1996) Tissue-specific factors additively increase the probability of the all-or-none formation of a hypersensitive site. EMBO J. 15, 2496–25
Hebbes, T. R., Clayton, A. L., Thorne, A. W., and Crane-Robinson, C. (1994) Core histone hyperacetylation co-maps with generalized DNase-I sensitivity in the chicken α-globin chromosomal domain. EMBO J. 13, 1823–18
Feil, R., Boyano, M. D., Allen, N. D.m and Kelsey, G. (1997) Parental chromosome-specific chromatin conformation in the imprinted U2af1-rs1 gene in the mouse. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 20,893–20,9
Feil, R. and Kelsey, G. (1997) Insights from model systems. Genomic imprinting: a chromatin connection. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61, 1213–12
Wu, C. (1989) Analysis of hypersensitive sites in chromatin. Methods Enzymol. 170, 269–2
Bellard, M., Dretzen, G., Giangrande, A., and Ramain, P. (1989) Nuclease digestion of transcriptionally active chromatin. Methods Enzymol. 170, 317–3
Sasaki, H., Jones, P. A., Chaillet, J. R., Ferguson-Smith, A. C., Barton, S. C., Reik, W., and Surani, M. A. (1992) Parental imprinting: potentially active chromatin of the repressed maternal allele of the mouse insulin-like growth factor II (Igf2) gene. Genes Dev. 6, 1843–18
Feil, R., Handel, M-A., Allen, N. D., and Reik, W. (1995) Chromatin structure and imprinting: developmental control of DNase-I sensitivity in the mouse insulin-like growth factor 2 gene. Dev. Genet. 17, 240–2
Stewart, A. F., Reik, A., and Schütz, G. (1991) A simpler and better method to cleave chromatin with Dnase-I for hypersensitive site analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 31
Dean, W., Bowden, L., Aitchison, A., Klose, J., Moore, T., Meneses, J. J., Reik, W., and Feil, R. (1998) Altered imprinted gene methylation and expression in completely ES cell-derived mouse fetuses: association with aberrant phenotypes. Development 125, 2273–22
Bartolomei, M. S., Webber, A. L., Brunkow, M. E., and Tilghman, S. M. (1993) Epigenetic mechanisms underlying the imprinting of the mouse H19 gene. Genes Dev. 7, 1663–16
Kramer, J. A., McCarrey, J. R., Djakiew, D., and Krawetz, S. A. (1998) Differentiation: the selective potentiation of chromatin domains. Development 125, 4749–47
McCabe, V., Formstone, E. J., O’Neill, L. P., Turner, B. M., and Brockdorff, N. (1999) Chromatin structure analysis of the mouse Xist gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 7155–71
Gregory, R. I. and Feil, R. (1999) Analysis of chromatin in limited numbers of cells: a PCR-SSCP based assay of allele-specific nuclease sensitivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, e32i–
Orita M., Iwahana, H., Kanazawa, K., and Sekiya, T. (1989) Detection of polymorphisms of human DNA by gel electrophoresis as single-strand conformation polymorphisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 2766–27
Orita, M., Suzuki, Y, Sekiya, T., and Hayashi, K. (1989) A rapid and sensitive detection of point mutations and DNA polymorphisms using the polymerase chain reaction. Genomics 5, 874–8
Warren, W., Hovig, E., Smith-Sorensen, B., Borresen, A-L., Fujimura, F. K., Liu, Q., Feng, J., and SomMer, S. S. (1997) Detection of mutations by singlestrand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis and SSCP-hybrid methods, in Current Protocols in Human Genetics (Boyle, A. L., ed.), Wiley, New York, pp. 7.41–7.4.23.
Cartwright, I. L. and Elgin, S. C. R. (1989) Nonenzymatic cleavage of chromatin. Methods Enzym. 170, 359–3
Drew, H. R. (1984) Structural specificities of five comMonly used DNA nucleases. J. Mol. Biol. 176, 535–5
Erlich, H. A. (1989) PCR Technology, Stockton, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Gregory, R.I., Khosla, S., Feil, R. (2002). Probing Chromatin Structure with Nuclease Sensitivity Assays. In: Ward, A. (eds) Genomic Imprinting. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 181. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-211-2:269
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-211-2:269
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-741-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-211-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols