Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology™ ((MIMB,volume 198))

  • 1161 Accesses

Abstract

Many interesting new hypotheses about neural stem cells are now being tested. For example, understanding the potential of stem cells from nonneuronal tissue types to differentiate into neural tissue is of great interest. Definitive proof of some of these hypotheses requires overcoming current technical limitations and difficulties. One of the technical challenges of research involving neural stem cells is identification of transplanted cells in situ. Unequivocal identification of transplanted cells after integration into host brain tissue can be extremely difficult. Genes inserted into donor cells to code for marker proteins may be downregulated over time, or may be downregulated after stem cells differentiate into mature neural cells. Cells prelabelled with Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) or a tracer dye may continue to divide, thus diluting the label until daughter cells carry so little label that it is below detectable levels. Cross-species transplantation (mouse into rat or human into rodent, for example) requires identification of donor cells by antibodies that are absolutely species specific, which is sometimes difficult to achieve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gussoni, E., Wang, Y., Fraefel, C. Miller, R. G., Blau, H. M., Geller, A. I., and Kunkel, L. M. (1996) A method to codetect introduced genes and their products in gene therapy protocols. Nature Biotechnology 14, 1012–1016.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mezey, E., Chandross, K. J., Harta, G., Maki, R. A., and McKercher, S. R. (2000) Turning blood into brain: cells bearing neuronal antigens generated in vivo from bone marrow. Science 290, 1779–1782.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wetmur, J. G., Ruyechan, W. T., and Douthart, R. J. (1981) Denaturation and renaturation of Penicillium chrysogenum mycophage double-stranded ribonuclei acid in tetraalkylammonium salt solutions. Biochemistry 20, 2999–3002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryder, E. F., Snyder, E. Y., and Cepko, C. L. (1990) Establishment and characterization of multipotent neural cell lines using retrovirus vector-mediated oncogene transfer. J. Neurobiol. 21, 356–375.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Humana Press Inc.

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Tate, B.A., Ostroff, R.L. (2002). Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization. In: Zigova, T., Sanberg, P.R., Sanchez-Ramos, J.R. (eds) Neural Stem Cells: Methods and Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 198. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-186-8:189

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-186-8:189

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-964-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-186-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics