Nanoarchitecture of Plasma Membrane Visualized with Atomic Force Microscopy

  • Hans Oberleithner
  • Hermann Schillers
  • Stefan W. Schneider
  • Robert M. Henderson
Part of the Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology book series (MIPT)


The atomic force microscope (AFM) was developed in 1986 (1). Like the scanning-tunnelling microscope (STM) that preceded it, the AFM is a scanning-probe microscope. These instruments differ from “conventional” optical and electron microscopes because they work by moving a probe back and forth across a surface and recording features as the probe encounters them. Scanning-probe microscopes thus produce images that are not compromised by the limitations of the wavelengths of the various types of electromagnetic radiation. This means that very high resolution can be obtained. In some cases, studying physically hard samples down to atomic resolution, but with softer samples, the maximum resolution is at present in the order of 1 and 0.1 nm in the lateral and vertical directions, respectively. The probe of the STM is made from a conductive material and the instrument works by measuring a current — the “tunnelling current” between the probe and the sample. Thus, the STM is suitable for use only to study electrically conductive materials. The AFM, on the other hand, can be used on nonconducting specimens. As a result of the high resolution and the fact that it can be used on samples under fluid, the AFM (which was originally designed with applications in physical sciences in mind) soon attracted interest among biological scientists (2) as a tool for imaging cellular and subcellular structures under physiological or near-physiological conditions and to study dynamic features of molecular behavior at high resolution in “real time” under these conditions. Biological work using the AFM has shown considerable growth throughout the 1990s (3). As a result, partly owing to technical innovations, the realization that useful images could be obtained under fluid, together with the ready availability of microscopes from a number of manufacturers, the field has moved on and expanded far beyond that envisaged when the instrument was developed.


Atomic Force Microscope Lipid Bilayer Force Curve Mica Surface Madin Darby Canine Kidney Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Binnig, G. and Quate, C. F. (1986) Atomic force microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 56(9), 930–934.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hansma, P. K., Elings, V. B., Marti, O., and Bracker, C. E. (1988) Scanning tunneling microscopy and atomic force microscopy: application to biology and technology. Science 242, 209–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hansma, H. G. and Pietrasanta, L. (1998) Atomic force microscopy and other scanning probe microscopies. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2, 579–584.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hansma, P. K., Drake, B., Grigg, D., Prater, C. B., et al. (1994) A new, opticallever based atomic force microscope. J. Appl. Phys. 76, 796–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Putman, C. A. J., Van der Werf, K. O., De Grooth, B. G., Van Hulst, N. F., et al. (1994) Tapping mode atomic force microscopy in liquid. App. Phys. Lett. 64, 2454–2456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dai H, Hafner, J. H., Rinzler, A. G., Colbert, D. T., et al. (1996) Nanotubes as nanoprobes in scanning probe microscopy. Nature 384, 147–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drake, B., Prater, C. B., Weisenhorn, A. L., Gould, S. A. C., et al. (1989) Imaging crystals, polymers, and processes in water with the atomic force microscope. Science 243, 1586–1589.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoh, J. H. and Hansma, P. K. (1992) Atomic force microscopy for high-resolution imaging in cell biology. Trends. Cell. Biol. 2, 208–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shao, Z. and Yang, J. (1995) Progress in high resolution atomic force microscopy in biology. Q. Rev. Biophys. 28, 195–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Henderson, R. M. and Oberleithner, H. (2000) Pushing, pulling, dragging and vibrating renal epithelia using atomic force microscopy. Am. J. Physiol. BOED, 278, T689–T701.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Larmer, J., Schneider, S. W., Danker, T., Schwab, A., et al. (1997) Imaging excised apical plasma membrane patches of MDCK cells in physiological conditions with atomic force microscopy. Pflügers Arch. 434, 254–260.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamill, O. P., Marty, A., Neher, E., Sakmann, B., et al. (1981) Improved techniques for high-resolution current recording from cell-free membrane patches. Pflügers Arch. 391, 85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Allen, M. J., Hud, N. V., Balooch, M., Tench, R. J., et al. (1992) Tip-radiusinduced artifacts in AFM images of protamine-complexed DNA fibers. Ultramicroscopy 42-44, 1095–1100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schneider, S. W., Lärmer, J., Henderson, R. M., and Oberleithner, H. (1998) Molecular weights of individual proteins correlate with molecular volumes measured by atomic force microscopy. Pflügers Arch. 435, 362–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Crowe, J. H., Hoekstra, F. A., and Crowe, L. M. (1992) Anhydrobiosis. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 54, 579–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Candia, S., Garcia, M. L., and Latorre, R. (1992) Mode of action of iberiotoxin, a potent blocker of the large conductance Ca2+activated K+ channel. Biophys. J. 63, 583–590.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schwab, A., Westphale, H.-J., Wojnowski, L., Wünsch, S., et al. (1993) Spontaneously oscillating K+ channel activity in transformed Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. J. Clin. Invest. 92, 218–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Henderson, R. M., Schneider, S., Li, Q., Hornby, D., et al. (1996) Imaging ROMK1 inwardly rectifying ATP-sensitive K+ channel protein using atomic force microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 8756–8760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ho, K., Nichols, C. G., Lederer, W. J., Lytton, J., et al. (1993) Cloning and expression of an inwardly rectifying ATP-regulated potassium channel. Nature 362, 31–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ehrenhoefer, U., Rakowska, A., Schneider, S. W., Schwab, A., and Oberleithner, H. (1998) Atomic force microscopy detects ATP-sensitive protein clusters in the plasma membrane of transformed MDCK cells. Cell Biol. Intern 21(11), 737–746.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schillers, H., Danker, T., Schnittler, H. J., and Oberleithner, H. (2000) Plasma membrane plasticity of Xenopus laevis oocyte imaged with atomic force microscopy. Cell Physiol. Biochem., 10, 99–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Madeja, M., Musshoff, U., Kuhlmann, D., and Speckmann, E. J. (1991) Membrane currents elicited by the epileptogenic drug pentylenetetrazole in the native oocyte of Xenopus laevis. Brain. Res. 553, 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Choe, H. and Sackin, H. (1997) Improved preparation of Xenopus oocytes for patch-clamp recording. Pflügers Arch. 433, 648–652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Oberleithner
    • 1
  • Hermann Schillers
    • 1
  • Stefan W. Schneider
    • 1
  • Robert M. Henderson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of MuensterMuensterGermany
  2. 2.Department of PharmacologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridge

Personalised recommendations