A Dominant Negative Approach for Functional Studies of the Kinesin II Complex

  • Vladimir I. Gelfand
  • Nathalie Le Bot
  • M. Carolina Tuma
  • Isabelle Vernos
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 164)


There are a few ways to generate a dominant negative mutant. Specifically for the study of functions of motor proteins, two approaches have been successfully used. The first approach consists of the deletion of the motor domain. In this case the mutant protein is not able to hydrolyze ATP or/and bind to the cytoskeleton, and consequently, unable to promote movement. This is often referred to as a “headless” mutant, as the motor domain is commonly referred as the “head” of a motor protein. This strategy has been used previously for the study of motor protein functions for both microtubule and actin-based motors (1, 2, 3). The second type of dominant negative mutant is a rigor mutant, generated by a point mutation in the ATP-binding site; as a result, the motor binds to the cytoskeletal filament (actin or microtubules) but cannot hydrolyze ATP; this ATP-bound form of the motor is irreversibly locked to its cytoskeleton partner, a state defined as a rigor complex. Rigor mutants have been first identified, sequenced, and characterized for the yeast kinesin-like motor Kar3p (4) and Drosophila melanogaster nod (5). In both cases, the mutant protein was shown to bind irreversibly to microtubules. These observations suggested the use of rigor mutants as a tool for investigating the function of kinesin-like motors, and this approach has been successfully used for conventional kinesin (6).

In order to generate a dominant negative mutant of kinesin II, we chose to use the “headless” approach for two reasons. First, it is known that kinesin II forms


Formaldehyde Glycerol Electrophoresis Fractionation Trypsin 


  1. 1.
    Burns, C. G., Larochelle, D. A., Erickson, H., Reedy, M., and De Lozanne, A. (1995) Single-headed myosin II acts as a dominant negative mutation in Dictyostelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 8244–8248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bi, G. Q., Morris, R. L., Liao, G., Alderton, J. M., Scholey, J. M., and Steinhardt, R. A. (1997) Kinesin-and myosin-driven steps of vesicle recruitment for Ca2+-regulated exocytosis. J. Cell Biol. 138, 999–1008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arhets, P., Olivo, J.-C., Gounon, P., Sansonetti, P., and Guillen, N. (1998) Virulence and functions of myosin II are inhibited by overexpression of light meromyosin in Entamoeba histolytica. Mol. Biol. Cell. 9, 1537–1547.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meluh, P. B. and Rose, M. D. (1990) Kar3, a kinesin-related gene required for yeast nuclear fusion. Cell 60, 1029–1041.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rasooly, R. S., New, C. M., Zhang, P., Hawley, R. S., and Baker, B. S. (1991) The lethal (1) TW-6cs mutation of Drosophila melanogaster is a dominant antimorphic allele of nod and is associated with a single base change in the putative ATP-binding domain. Genetics 129, 409–422.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nakata, T. and Hirokawa, N. (1995) Point mutation of adenosine triphosphate-binding motif generated rigor kinesin that selectively blocks anterograde lysosome membrane transport. J. Cell Biol. 131, 1039-1053.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rashid, D. J., Wedaman, K. P., and Scholey, J. M. (1995) Heterodimerization of the two motor subunits of the heterotrimeric kinesin, KRP (85/95). J. Mol. Biol. 252, 157–162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hackney, D. D. (1994) Evidence for alternating head catalysis by kinesin during microtubule-stimulated ATP hydrolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6865–6869.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gilbert, S. P., Webb, M. R., Brune, M., and Johnson, K. A. (1995) Pathway of processive ATP hydrolysis by kinesin [see comments]. Nature 373, 671–676.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vale, R. D., Funatsu, T., Pierce, D. W., Romberg, L., Harada, Y., and Yanagida, T. (1996) Direct observation of single kinesin molecules moving along microtubules. Nature. 380, 451–453.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cole, D. G. and Scholey, J. M. (1995) Structural variations among the kinesins. Trends Cell Biol. 5, 259–262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reilein, A. R., Tint, I. S., Peunova, N. I., Enikolopov, G. N., and Gelfand, V. I. (1998) Regulation of organelle movement in melanophores by protein kinase A (PKA), protein kinase C (PKC), and protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A). J. Cell Biol. 142, 803-813.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tuma, M. C., Zill, A., Le Bot, N., Vernos, I., and Gelfand, V. (1998) Heterotrimeric kinesin II is the microtubule motor protein responsible for pigment dispersion in Xenopus melanophores. J. Cell Biol. 143, 1547–1558.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Daniolos, A., Lerner, A. B., and Lerner, M. R. (1990) Action of light on frog pigment cells in culture. Pigment Cell Res. 3, 38–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Le Bot, N., Antony, C., White, J., Karsenti, E., and Vernos, I. (1998) Role of xklp3, a subunit of the Xenopus kinesin II heterotrimeric complex, in membrane transport between the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus. J. Cell Biol. 143, 1559–1573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boleti, H., Karsenti, E., and Vernos, I. (1996) Xklp2, a novel Xenopus centrosomal kinesin-like protein required for centrosome separation during mitosis. Cell. 84, 49–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harlow, E. and Lane, D. (1988) Storing and purifying antibodies, in Antibodies. A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimir I. Gelfand
    • 1
  • Nathalie Le Bot
    • 2
  • M. Carolina Tuma
    • 3
  • Isabelle Vernos
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Cell and Structural BiologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaIL
  2. 2.European Molecular Biology LaboratoryHeidelbergGermany
  3. 3.Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental BiologyYale UniversityNew HavenCT

Personalised recommendations