Abstract
The assembly of chaperonin subunits into heptameric ring structures is a hallmark common to this group of proteins. In GroEL two of these rings are symmetrically stacked, resulting in a tetradecameric double-ring cylinder which is the functional form of the chaperonin. In this structure, unfolded substrate proteins bind to the apical subunit domains at the inner surface of the cylinder, whereas adenosine 5’-triphosphate (ATP) binding and hydrolysis occur at the level of the central subunit domains (1). GroES subunits assemble into a single heptameric ring, which can bind asymmetrically on top of a GroEL ring (2). Interestingly, the intracellular assembly of GroEL-type chaperonins appears to be a chaperone-dependent process itself and requires functional preformed chaperonin complexes (3). The intracellular folding pathway of GroES has not been analyzed, but in vitro the complex is able to assemble spontaneously from monomeric subunits (4,5). Cell-free assembly of GroEL in a Mg-ATP-dependent manner, starting from monomeric subunits, has been established, too (6,7). Like with GroES, in vitro assembly of GroEL is a reversible process, and depending on the conditions, dissociation of complexes can occur. The formation of these oligomeric structures poses thus an interesting folding problem per se. However, in addition to providing an interesting model system for folding and assembly studies, controlled (dis)assembly of chaperonins has also been found to be helpful in generating highly purified chaperonin complexes (8). A common problem during purification of GroEL is its contamination with bound substrate proteins, which are difficult to remove by conventional purification steps (see Chapter 3). Disassembly of GroEL into folded monomers and subsequent reassembly can result in functional chaperonin complexes, which are largely devoid of bound substrates. In a different application, site-directed mutagenesis studies of GroEL, the readiness with which the complex dissociates and reassembles, has been assayed to obtain information about the role of certain amino acid residues in the stability of the complex and in its oligomerization (9,10).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Braig, K., Otwinowski, Z., Hegde, R., Boisvert, D. C., Joachimiak, A., Horwich, A. L., and Sigler, P. B. (1994) The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å. Nature 371, 578–586.
Langer, T., Pfeifer, G., Martin, J., Baumeister, W., and Hartl, F.-U. (1992) Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: GroES binds to one end of the GroEL cylinder, which accommodates the protein substrate within its central cavity. EMBO J. 11, 4757–4765.
Cheng, M. Y., Hartl, F. U., and Horwich, A. L. (1990). The mitochondrial chaperonin hsp60 is required for its own assembly. Nature 348, 455–458.
Mascagni, P., Tonolo, M., Ball, H., Lim, M., Ellis, R. J., and Coates, A. (1991) Chemical synthesis of 10 kDa chaperonin. FEBS Lett. 286, 201–203.
Seale, J. W., Gorovits, B. M., Ybarra, J., and Horowitz, P. M. (1996) Reversible oligomerization and denaturation of the chaperonin GroES. Biochemistry 35, 4079–4083.
Lissin, N. M., Venyaminov, S. Y., and Girshovich, A. S. (1990) (Mg-ATP)-dependent self-assembly of molecular chaperone GroEL. Nature 348, 339–342.
Lissin, N. M. (1995) In vitro dissociation and self-assembly of three chaperonin 60s: the role of ATP. FEBS Lett. 361, 55–60.
Ybarra, J. and Horowitz, P. M. (1995) Inactive GroEL monomers can be isolated and reassembled to functional tetradecamers that contain few bound peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22,962–22,967.
Horovitz, A., Bochkareva, E. S., Kovalenko, O., and Girshovich, A. S. (1993) Mutation Ala2-→ Ser destabilizes intersubunit interactions in the molecular chaperone GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 271, 58–64.
Horovitz, A., Bochkareva, E. S., and Girshovich, A. S. (1993) The N terminus of the molecular chaperonin GroEL is a crucial structural element for its assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 9957–9959.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Humana Press Inc.
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Martin, J. (2000). Assembly and Disassembly of GroEL and GroES Complexes. In: Schneider, C. (eds) Chaperonin Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 140. Humana, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-061-6:65
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-061-6:65
Publisher Name: Humana, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-739-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-061-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols