Application of Direct Aqueous Supercritical Fluid Extraction for the Dynamic Recovery of Testosterone Liberated from the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Testosterone-β-D-Glucuronide

  • Edward D. Ramsey
  • Brian Minty
  • Anthony T. Rees
Part of the Methods In Biotechnology™ book series (MIBT, volume 13)

Abstract

The first report demonstrating the feasibility of supercritical fluids as solvent media for performing enzymatic reactions was published in 1986 (1). Since then several reports have confirmed that the relatively low critical temperature and pressure of supercritical fluid carbon dioxide provides potential for the use of enzymes with thermally labile substrates. These applications, which generally involve the use of immobilized enzymes in feasibility studies for batch scale processes, have been reviewed (2). One study (3) has demonstrated that the stability of nine commercially available enzyme preparations are largely unaffected using supercritical carbon dioxide containing ethanol (3–6%) and water (0.1%), at 35°C, 200 atm for 1 h. On the analytical scale, a few applications have described the use of enzymes in conjunction with supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) for sample preparation of liquid matrices (4).

Keywords

Hydrolysis High Performance Liquid Chromatography Dioxide Ethyl Silane 

References

  1. 1.
    Nakamura K., Chi Y. M., Yamada Y., and Yano T. (1986) Lipase activity and stability in supercritical fluid carbon dioxide. Chem. Eng. Commun. 45, 207–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nakamura K. (1990) Biochemical reactions in supercritical fluids. TIBTECH 8, 288–292.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taniguchi M., Kamilhara M., and Kobayashi T. (1987) Effect of treatment with supercritical carbon dioxide on enzymatic activity. Agric. Biol. Chem. 51, 593–594.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ramsey E. D., Minty B., and Babecki R. (1998) Supercritical fluid extraction strategies of liquid based matrices, in Analytical Supercritical Fluid Extraction Techniques (Ramsey E. D., ed.) Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 138–142.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Masse R., Ayotte C., and Dugal R. (1989) Studies on anabolic steroids: integrated methodological approach to the gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis of anabolic steroid metabolites in urine. J. Chromatogr. 489, 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Houghton E., Grainger M. C., Dumasia M. C., and Teale P. (1992) Application of gas chromatography/mass spectrometry to steroid analysis in equine sports: problems with enzyme hydrolysis. Organic Mass Spectrom. 27, 1061–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kicman A. T., Brooks R. V., Collyer S. C., Cowan D. A., Nanjee M. N., Southan G. J., and Wheeler M. J. (1990) Criteria to indicate testosterone administration. Br. J. Sports Med. 24, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ramsey E. D., Minty B., and Rees A. T. (1996) Dynamic aqueous supercritical fluid extraction of the enzymic hydrolysis of testosterone--D-glucuronide. Analysis of liberated testosterone by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal. Comm. 33, 307–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saito M. and Yamauchi Y. (1994) Instrumentation, in Fractionation by Packed-Column SFC and SFE (Saito M., Yamauchi Y., and Okuyama T., eds.), VCH Publishers, New York, 101–133.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taylor L. T. (1996) Supercritical Fluid Extraction. Wiley, New York, 53–57.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward D. Ramsey
    • 1
  • Brian Minty
    • 1
  • Anthony T. Rees
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Applied SciencesUniversity of GlamorganGlamorganUK
  2. 2.Nycomed AmershamCardiff LaboratoriesCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations