Abstract
In their original immunofluorescent labeling technique, Coons and colleagues employed a one-step, direct labeling of antigen using a fluorescein-conjugated antibody (1, 2). Although this was not the first published report of a chemically modified antibody, it was the first time the antibody was used as a tool to examine an antigen in situ. Shortly thereafter, this method was adapted, giving rise to the indirect labeling technique (3). Rather than conjugating a marker molecule to the primary antibody, in this technique, a secondary antibody raised against the γ globulin of the primary species is conjugated with the marker molecule (Fig. 1). Although the direct labeling technique has the advantage of being quick, requiring a single incubation with the labeled reagent and one subsequent wash step, there are disadvantages. Each different primary antibody must be fluorescently labeled, and the resulting fluorescence is weak since only one labeled primary antibody binds to each antigen. The indirect labeling technique adds one more incubation and wash step, but it has the advantage of amplifying the fluorescent signal because several fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies can bind to each primary antibody. In addition, labeled secondary reagents specific for various species’ immunoglobulin classes are readily available commercially, stable in the lyophilized or frozen state, and relatively inexpensive.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Coons, A. H., Creech, H J., and Jones, R N. (1941) Immunological properties of an antibody containing a fluorescent group. Proc. Soc. Exp Biol. Med. 47, 200–202
Coons, A H. and Kaplan, M H. (1950) Localizatron of antigen in tissue cells. J. Exp Med. 91, 1–13.
Coons, A. H., Leduc, E H., and Connolly, J. M. (1955) Studies on antibody productron. 1. A method for the histochemical demonstration of specific antibody and its application to a study of the hyperimmune rabbit J Exp. Med 102, 49–59.
Ishikawa, E., Imagawa, M., Hashida, S, Yoshitake, S., Hamaguchi, Y., and Ulno, T. (1983) Enzyme-labeling of anttbodles and their fragments for enzyme immuno-assay and immunohistochemical staining. J. Immunoassay 4, 209
Hnatowich, D. J. (1990) Recent developments in the radtolabeling of antibodies with iodine, indium, and technetium. Sem. Nuclear Med. 20, 80–91.
Goldenberg, D. M (1991) Imaging and therapy of gastromtestinal cancers with radiolabeled antibodies. Am J Gastroenterology 86, 1392–1403.
Griffins, G. L., Goldenberg, D M., Knapp, F. F., Jr., Callaghan, A. P., Chang, C. H, and Hansen, H.J. (1991) Direct radiolabeling of monoclonal antibodies with generator-produced rhenmm-188 for radioimmunotherapy labeling and animal biodistribution studies. Cancer Rex 51, 4594–4602
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Humana Press Inc.
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Javois, L.C. (1994). Direct Immunofluorescent Labeling of Cells. In: Javois, L.C. (eds) Immunocytochemical Methods and Protocols. Methods in Molecular Bilogy, vol 34. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603285-X:117
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603285-X:117
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-285-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-521-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols