Skip to main content

Cytotoxicity Testing Using Cell Lines

  • Protocol
Animal Cell Biotechnology

Part of the book series: Methods in Biotechnology™ ((MIBT,volume 8))

Abstract

Commercially exploitable compounds are being produced using modern biotechnology for use as food additives, chemotherapeutic agents, and pesticides. Traditionally, animal testing has always played an important role in the safety evaluation of such agents. However, financial and ethical considerations, together with an increased awareness of the limitations of animal models in relation to human metabolism, now warrant the development of alternative testing methods. Therefore, it is fitting that the potential of biotechnology should provide mammalian cell systems for in vitro testing. The ultimate aim of in vitro toxicity testing is the replacement of animals in testing protocols, but in the short term, procedures are refined to reduce the numbers of animals required. This “three Rs” philosophy of reduction, refinement, and replacement was first proposed by Russell and Burch as early as 1959 (1), and is now recognized in the UK Animals in Scientific Procedures Act, 1986 and EC Directive 86/609/ECC (2).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Russell, W. M. S. and Burch, R. L. (1959) The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fentem, J. and Balls, M. (1992) In vitro alternatives to toxicity testing in animals. Chem. Ind. 207–211.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson, A. P. (1989) Cytotoxicity and viability assays, in Animal Cell Culture: A Practical Approach (Freshney, R. I., ed.), IRL, Oxford, pp. 183–216.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Freshney, R. I. (1994) Culture of Animal Cells, A Manual of Basic Techniques, Wiley-Liss, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Freshney, R. I. (1989) Animal Cell Culture: A Practical Approach, IRL, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Benford, D. J. and Hubbard, S. A. (1987) Preparation and culture of mammalian cells, in Biochemical Toxicology: A Practical Approach (Snell, K. and Mullock, B., eds.), IRL, Oxford, pp. 57–82.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Riddell, R. J., Panacer, D. S., Wilde, S. M., Clothier, R. H., and Balls, M. (1986) The importance of exposure period and cell type in in vitro cytotoxicity testing. ATLA 14, 86–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Borenfreund, E. and Puerner, J. A. (1985) Toxicity determined in vitro by morphological alterations and neutral red absorption. Toxicol. Lett. 24, 119–124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rotman, B. and Papermaster, B. W. (1966) Membrane properties of living animal cells as studied by enzymatic hydrolysis of fluorogenic esters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 55, 134–141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reader, S. J., Blackwell, V., O’Hara, R., Clothier, R. H., Griffin, G., and Balls, M. (1989) A vital dye release method for assaying the short term cytotoxic effects of chemicals and formulations. ATLA 17, 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reader, S. J., Blackwell, V., O’Hara, R., Clothier, R. H., Griffin, G., and Balls, M. (1990) Neutral red release from pre-loaded cells as an in vitro approach to testing for eye irritancy potential. Toxicol. In Vitro, 4, 264–266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Iselt, M, Holtei, W., and Hilgard, P. (1989) The tetrazolium dye assay for rapid in vitro assessment of cytotoxicity. Arzneimittel-forschung 39, 747–749.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Clothier, R. H., Atkinson, K. A., Garle, M. J., Ward, R. K., and Willshaw, A. (1995) The development and evaluation of in vitro tests by the FRAME alternatives laboratory. ATLA 23, 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Spirlmann, H., Balls, M., Brand, M., Doring, B., Holzhutter, H. G., Kalweit, S., Klecak, G., Eplattenier, H. L., Liebsch, M., Lovell, W. W., Maurer, T., Moldenhauer, F., Moore, L., Pape, W. J. W., Pfanenbecker, U., Potthast, J., Desilva, O., Steiling, W., and Willshaw, A. (1994) EEC COLIPA project on in vitro phototoxicity testing—first results obtained with Balb/c 3T3 cell phototoxicity assay. Toxicol. in Vitro 8, 793–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harbell, J. D., Tsai, Y. C., Maibach, H. I., Gay, R., Miller, K., and Mun, G. C. (1994) An in vivo correlation with 3 in vitro assays to assess skin irritation potential. J. Toxicol. Cut. Ocul. Toxicol. 13, 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lewis, M., McCall, J. C., Botham, P. A., and Trebilock, R. (1994) A comparison of 2 cytotoxicity tests for predicting the ocular irritancy of surfactants. Toxicol. in Vitro 8, 867–869.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Christian, M. S. and Diener, R. M. (1996) Soaps and detergents—alternatives to animal eye irritation tests. J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 15, 1–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Buckberry, L.D. (1999). Cytotoxicity Testing Using Cell Lines. In: Jenkins, N. (eds) Animal Cell Biotechnology. Methods in Biotechnology™, vol 8. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-547-6:239

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-547-6:239

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-547-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-486-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics