Characterization of RNA Using Continuous RT-PCR Coupled with ELOSA

  • François Mallet
  • Guy Oriol
  • Bernard Mandrand
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 86)

Abstract

Characterization of RNA using Northern blotting or RNase protection assay is achieved by a two step procedure including a separation step and a detection step. Specificity and sensitivity are conferred by both the separation process and hybridtzation with radiolabeled probes. In both techniques, the observed results are validated after normalization of RNA performed by using a probe generally targeting a housekeeping gene. The greatest sensitivity was reached with the recently introduced reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). However, because of the sensitivity of RT-PCR, false positives could present a problem. The selection of primer sets overlapping splice Junctions could prevent amplification of potentially contaminating DNA in the RNA preparation. Using an RT-PCR process that does not require the reopening of the test tube could reduce the risk of introducing contaminating cloned cDNA or RNA during handling. False negatives could also present a problem. Quality of the RNA preparation (and quantity) could be checked by amplification of a housekeeping gene that informs one of the presence of potentially contaminating inhibtiors of the enzymatic reaction. The specrficrty in RT-PCR assays is generally achieved using a detection analysis by Southern blot, dot blot, or restrrctron mapping. These techniques are generally used in specialized laboratories and could be replaced by microtiter plate or tube format assays well-adapted to clmical applications (1). On such a format assay, PCR products must be captured on a solid phase and further detected by direct or indirect nonisotopic labeling (reviewed in ref. 2).

Keywords

Steam Tuberculosis MgCl2 Half Life Gelatin 

References

  1. 1.
    Whetsell A. J., Drew J. B., Milman G., Hoff R., Dragon E. A., Adler K., Hui J., Otto P., Gupta P., Farzadegan H., and Wolinsky S. M. (1992) Comparison of three nonradioisotopic polymerase chain reaction-based methods for detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Clan Microbial. 30,(4) 845–853.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Manak M. M (1993) Hybridization formats and detection procedures In Keller G. H. and Manak M. M., (eds.) DNA Probes Stockton, New York. pp. 199–249.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mallet F., Oriol G., Mary C., Verrier B., and Mandrand B. (1995) Continuous RT-PCR using AMV-RT and Taq DNA polymerase: characterization and comparison to uncoupled procedures. BioTechniques l8, 678–687.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shimomaye E and Salvato M. (1991) Use of avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase at high temperature for sequence analysis of highly structured RNA Gene Anal. Tech 6, 25–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang R F, Cao W. W., and Johnson M. G. (1992) A simphfied, single buffer system for RNA-PCR. BioTechniques 12, 702–704.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hearst E. H. (1988) A photochemical investigation of the dynamics of oligonucleotide hybridization. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem 39, 291–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Francois M., Dubois F, Brand D., Bacq Y., Guerois C., Mouchet C, Tichet J., Goudeau A., and Barm F (1993) Prevalence and significance of hepatitis C (HCV) vnemia in HCV antibody-positive subjects from various populations. J Clin. Microbiol 31, 1189–1193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mallet F., Hebrard C, Brand D., Chapuis E., Cros P, Allibert P, Besnier M., Bat-m F., and Mandrand B. (1993) Enzyme-linked ohgosorbent assay for detection of polymerase chain reaction-amphfied human immunodeficiency vnus type 1. J Clzn Mcrobiol 31, 1444–1449.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brossard Y., Aubin J T., Mandelbrot L., Brgnozzi C, Brand D., Chaput A., Roume J., Mulhez N., Mallet F., Agut H., Bann F., Brechot C., Goudeau A., Huraux J. M, Barrat J., Blot P., Chavmie J., Cnaru-Vigneron N, Engelman P, Hervé F, Paptemik E., and Hennon R (1995) Frequency of early in utero HIV-l infection: a blind DNA polymerase cham reaction study on 100 fetal thymuses AIDS 9(4), 359–366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mallet F, Hebrard C, Livrozet J M., Lees O., Tron F, Touraine J L., and Mandrand B. (1995) Quantitation of human immunodeficiency vn-us type 1 DNA by two PCR procedures coupled with enzyme-linked oligosorbent assay. J Ch Microbiol. 33, 3201–3208.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cros P, Allibert P., Mandrand B., Trercy J. M., and Mach B (1992) Ohgonucleotide genotypmg of HLA polymorphtsm on microtitre plates. Lancet 340, 870–873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mabllat C, Desvarenne S., Panteix G, Machabert N., Bermllon M. H, Guardiola G., and Cros P. (1994) Routme tdentification of Mjwobacterzum tuberculosis complex isolates by automated hybridrzation. J. Clzn Mzcrobiol. 32, 2702–2705.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Urdea M. S., Warner B. D., Runnmg J. A., Stempten M., Clyne J., and Horn T. (1988) A comparison of nonradioisotoptc hybridization assay methods using fluorescent, chemmumnescent and enzyme labeled synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotide probes Nucleic Acids Res. 16 4937–4956.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mallet F. (1996) Continuous RT-PCR usmg AMV-RT and Tug DNA polymerase. In Burke J. (ed) PCR. Essentzal Technzques. BIOS Scientific, Pp. 82–85, J. Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Myers G., Korber B., Berzofsky J. A, Smith R. F., and Pavlakts G N. (1991) Human retrovnuses and AIDS: a compilation and analysis of nucleic acid and amino acid sequences IA3-IA69 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • François Mallet
    • 1
  • Guy Oriol
    • 1
  • Bernard Mandrand
    • 1
  1. 1.Ecole Normale Superieure de LyonLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations