Skip to main content

Strain-Dependent Differences in the Expression of the Oncofetal Protein p65 in Mice Susceptible and Resistant to Chemical Carcinogenesis

  • Protocol
Tumor Marker Protocols

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Medicine™ ((MIMM,volume 14))

  • 437 Accesses

Abstract

The 65-kDa oncofetal protein (p65), a novel tumor marker (17), is highly conserved m different species (2,4). We have identified the p65 gene as a novel member of the family of genes that encode receptors for steroid hormones, vitamin D, retmoic acid and thyroid hormone (7). The p65 protein is highly homologous to estrogen receptor (ER) m its DNA binding domain but other regions of the sequence do not show similarities, indicating that p65 is a new transcription factor or receptor with an as yet unknown ligand. Using enzymelmked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunostaining, p65 was shown (5,6), to be a promismg marker for diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. With a view toward early detection of cancer, we have studied strain-dependent differences in the expression of p65 in different organs of mice highly susceptible (C3H/HeJ) and relatively resistant (C57BL/6N) to carcinogenesis. In this chapter, we describe a new, general procedure for detection of p65 mRNA by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). This method is sensitive enough to detect a small number of the p65-specific mRNA molecules in mammary glands and livers of young, 7–8 wk-old female mice of the C3H/HeJ strain are known to spontaneously develop mammary tumors and be sensitive to liver tumor induction. No p65-specific mRNA was detected in a control group of C57BL/6N mice known to be resistant to chemical carcmogenesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hanausek-Walaszek M., Del Rio M., and Adams A K. (1989) Immunohlstochemical demonstration of mRNA-transport protein in rat liver putative preneoplastic foci. Cancer Lett 48, 105–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hanausek-Walaszek M, Del Rio M, and Adams A K. (1990) Structural and immunological identity of p65 tumor-associated factors from rat and mouse hepatocarcmomas. Progr Cfin Bzol Res 331, 109–120.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mirowski M, Sherman U, and Hanausek M (1992) Purification and characterization of a 65-kDa tumor-associated phosphoprotem from rat transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma 1682C cell line. Protein Expr Purif 3, 196–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mirowskl M., Walaszek Z, Sherman U., Adams A. K, and Hanausek M (1993) Comparative structural analysis of human and rat 65 kDa phosphoprotein Int J Blochem 25, 1865–1871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang S., Mirowski M., Sherman U., Walaszek Z., and Hanausek M. (1993) Monoclonal antibodies against a 65 kDa tumor-associated phosphoprotem development and use in cancer detection. Hybridoma 12, 167–176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mirowski M., Klijanienko J., Wang S., Vielh P., Walaszek Z, and Hanausek M (1994) Serological and immunohistochemical detection of a 65 kDa protein breast cancer Eur J Cancer 30A, 1108–1113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanausek M, SzemraJ J., Adams A. K., and Walaszek Z. (1996) The oncofetal protein p65. a new member of the steroid/thyroid receptor superfamily Cancer Detect Prev 20, 94–102.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bennet L M., Famham P. J., and Drinkwater N R. (1995) Strain-dependent differences in DNA synthesis and gene expression in the regenerating livers of C57B1/6J and C3H/HeJ mice Moi Carcinogenesis 14, 46–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Drinkwater N R. and Ginsler J. J (1986) Genetic control of hepatocarcinogenesis in C57BL/6J and C3H/HeJ inbred mice. Carcmogenesis 7, 1701–1707.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bennett L. M., Winkler M. L, and Drinkwater N. R. (1993) A gene that determines the high susceptibility of the C3H/HeJ strain of mouse to liver tumor induction is located on chromosome one. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 33, 144

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gariboldi M., Manenti G., Canzian F., Falvella S., Pierotti M, Della Porta G., and Dragani T. A (1993) Chromosomal mapping of murine susceptibility loci to liver carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 53, 209–211.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Manenti G, Binelli G, Gariboldi M, Canzian F, De Gregoriol R, Flavella S, Dragani T. A., and Pierotti M (1994) Multiple loci affect genetic predispositton to hepatocarcinogenesis in mice Genomics 23, 118–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Medina D (1976) Preneoplastic lesions in murine mammary cancer Cancer Res 36, 2589–2595

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwartz M S., Smith G H., and Medina D. (1992) The effect of parity, tumor latency and transplantation of the activation of int loct in MMTV-induced, transplantal C3H mammary neoplasias and their tumors. Int J Cancer 51, 805–811.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dux A (1981) Sensitivity of the mammary gland to tumor formation, in Mammary Tumors in the Mouse (Hilgers J. and Skryser M., eds.), Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 516–543

    Google Scholar 

  16. Festing M F. W. and Blackmore D. K. (1971) Life span of specified-pathogen-free (MRC category 4) mice and rats Lab Anlm (Lond) 5, 179–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Burmer G C. and Loeb L A. (1989) Mutations in the K-ras 2 oncogene during progressive stages of human colon carcinoma. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci USA 86, 2403–2407

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Burmer G. C, Parker J D, Bates J, East K., and Kulander B G (1990) Comparative analysis of human papillomavirus detection by polymerase chain reaction and Virapap/Viratype Am J Clin Pathol 94, 554–560

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Burmer G. C., Rabinovitch P S, and Loeb L. A. (1989) Analysis of c-Ki-ras mutations in human colon carcinoma by cell sorting, polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing. Cancer Res. 49, 214l–2146.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Frohman M. A., Dush M K., and Martin G. R (1988) Rapid productton of full-length cDNAs from rare transcripts. amplification using single gene specific oligonucleotide primer. Proc Nat1 Acad Scl USA 85, 8998–9002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Higuchi R, von Beroldingen C H, Sensabaugh G F, and Erlich H A. (1988) DNA typing from single hairs Nature 333, 543-540

    Google Scholar 

  22. Saiki R K, Gelfand D H, Stoffel S., Scharf S J., Higuchi R, Horn G. T, Mullis K B., and Erlich H. A (1988) Primer directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Sczence 39, 487–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Erlich H. A (1989) PCR Technology Prlnclples and Appllcatlons for DNA Amplrjkatton. Stockton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ponce R. P and Micol J L (1992) PCR amplification of long DNA fragments Nucleic Acids Res 20, 3–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. D’Aquaila R. T., Bechtel L. J, Videler J A., Eron J J., Gorczyca P, and Kaplan J. C. (1991) Maximizing sensitivity and specificity of PCR by pre-amplification heating. Nucleic Acids Res 19, 3749–3754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hanausek-Walaszek M, Adams A. K., and Sherman U. (1991) Expression of a 65 kda tumor-associated protein and persistence of altered hepatic faci. Progr Clm Blol Res 369, 91–103

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hanausek M., Sherman U., Mirowski M, and Walaszek Z Induction of a 65 kDa tumor-associated protein in altered hepatic foci of rats fed the peroxisome proliferator Wy-14,643 Progr Clan Biol Res 387, 337–348

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ponglikitmongkol M., Green S., and Chambon P (1988) Genomic organization of the human oestrogen receptor gene EMBO J 7, 3385–3388

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Humana Press Inc, Totowa, NJ

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Szemraj, J., Hanausek, M., Walaszek, Z., Adams, A.K. (1998). Strain-Dependent Differences in the Expression of the Oncofetal Protein p65 in Mice Susceptible and Resistant to Chemical Carcinogenesis. In: Hanausek, M., Walaszek, Z. (eds) Tumor Marker Protocols. Methods in Molecular Medicine™, vol 14. Springer, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-380-5:475

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-380-5:475

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-380-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-598-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics