Efficient PCR Production of Single-Stranded DNA Sequencing Templates
The acceptance of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as a routine method in molecular biology has created a need for simple and robust approaches to DNA sequencing of the amplification products. In addition to its ease, direct sequencing of PCR products has the advantage that nucleotide misincorporation during amplification does not pose a problem, because only a small percentage of the DNA molecules may contain such random mutations. However, a large body of published protocols attests to the difficulties encountered in this endeavor. Double-stranded sequencing of the linear PCR products is notoriously unreliable because of rapid reannealing of the denatured DNA.
KeywordsPolymerase Chain Reaction dNTP Concentration dsDNA Fragment Asymmetric Polymerase Chain Reaction ssDNA Sequencing
- 3.Gibbs, R. A., Nguyen, P.-A., and Caskey, C. T. (1991) Direct DNA sequencing of complementary DNA amplified by the polymerase chain reaction, in Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 9, Protocols in Human Molecular Genetics (Mathew, C., ed.), Humana, Totowa, NJ, pp. 9–20.Google Scholar
- 4.Kadowaki, T., Kadowaki, H., and Taylor, S. I. (1990) A nonsense mutation causing decreased levels of insulin receptor mRNA: detection by a simplified technique for direct sequencing of genomic DNA amplified by polymerase chain reaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 658–662.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Medori, R., Tritschler, H.-J., and Gambetti, P. (1992) Production of single-stranded DNA for sequencing: an alternative approach. BioTechniques 12, 347–349.Google Scholar
- 9.Bangham, C. R. M. (1991) The polymerase chain reaction. Getting started, in Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 9, Protocols in Human Molecular Genetics (Mathew, C., ed.), Humana, Totowa, NJ, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
- 10.Innis, M. A. and Gelfand, D. H. (1990) Optimization of PCRs, in PCR Protocols A Guide to Methods and Applications (Innis, M. A., Gelfand, D. H., Sninsky, J. J., and White, T. J., eds.), Academic, New York, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar