Skip to main content

The Use of Adjuvants in Experimental Vaccines

II. Water-in-Oil Emulsions: Freund’s Complete and lncomplete Adjuvants

  • Protocol
Vaccine Protocols

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Medicine™ ((MIMM,volume 4))

Abstract

As mentioned in Chapter 9, Freund’s complete adjuvant (FCA), produced by the Statens Seruminstitut (Copenhagen, Denmark), was chosen as the standard adjuvant preparation because of its extensive use in experimental vaccines in animals, its strong adjuvant effect, and the considerable literature describing its activity. The combination of mineral oil (Bayol 55) and dead mycobacterial organisms produces a specific cellular reaction in experimental animals. The mycobacteria in FCA stimulate the formation of epithelioid macrophage cells and also the maturation of plasmablasts to plasma cells. The effect was greater when the oil and mycobacterial fraction were combined. Numerous studies have shown that the oil emulsion was responsible for the retention of the antigen at the site of inoculation. This depot provides a slow and prolonged antigenic stimulus to antibody-forming cells. FCA stimulates active humoral and cell-mediated immune responses but there may be concomitant adverse side-effects because of the reactogenicity of some types of mineral oil, particularly the formation of the epithelioid macrophage granuloma at the site of injection and local ulceration when the injection is given subcutaneously. In addition, other contraindications have been recorded, e.g., pyrogenicity, stimulation of experimental autoimmune diseases, and adjuvani. arthritis (reviewed in detail by Stewart-Tull[1, 2]).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stewart-Tull, D. E. S. (1983) Immunologically important constituents of mycobacteria, in The BmEogy ofthe Mycobacteria, vol. 2 (Ratledge, C. and Stanford, J., eds.), Academic, London, pp. 3–84.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stewart-Tull, D. E. S. (1985) Immunopotentiating activity of peptidoglycan and surface polymers, in Immunology of the Bacterial Cell Envelope (Stewart-Tull, D. E. S. and Davies, M., eds.), Wiley, Chichester and New York, pp. 47–89.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stewart-Tull, D. E. S., ed. (1994) The Theory and Practxal Application of Aajuvants. Wiley, Chichester and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stewart-Tull, D. E. S., Shimono, T., Kotani, S., and Knights, B. A. (1976) Immunosuppressive effect in mycobacterial adjuvant emulsions of mineral oils containing low molecular weight hydrocarbons. Int. Arch. Allergy Appl Immunol. 52, 118–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stewart-Tull, D. E. S. and Rowe, R. E. C. (1975) Procedures for large-scale antiserum production in sheep. J. Immunol. Meth. 8, 37–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stewart-Tull, D. E. S. (1988) Recommendations for the assessment of adjuvants (immunopotentiators), in Immunological Adjuvants and Vaccznes, NATO ASI Series A: Life Sciences, vol. 179 (Gregoriadis, G., Alhson, A. C., and Poste, G., eds), Plenum, New York, pp. 213–226.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stewart-Tull, D. E. S. (1991) The assessment and use of adluvants, in Vaccznes (Gregoriadis, G., Allison, A., and Poste, G., eds.), Plenum, New York, pp, 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davenport, F. M., Hermessy, A. V., Houser, H. B., and Cryns, W. F. (1956) Evaluation of adjuvant mfluenza vnus vaccine tested agamst influenza B, 1954–1955. yAm. J. Hyg. 64, 304–313.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davenport, F. M. and Hemressy, A. V. (1956) Serologic recapitulation of past experiences with influenza A: antibody response to monovalent vaccine J. Exp. Med. 104, 85–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bell, J A., Philip, R. N., Davis, D. J., Beem, M. O, Beigelman, P. M., Engler, J. I., Mellm, G. W., Johnson, J. H., and Lerner, A. M. (1961) Epidemiologic studies on influenza in familial and general populations, 1951–1956. IV vaccine reactions. Am. J. Hyg. 73, 148–163.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davenport, F. M. (1968) Seventeen years experience with mmeral 011 adjuvant influenza virus vaccmes. Ann Allerg. 26, 288–292.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Humana Press Inc, Totowa, NJ

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Stewart-Tull, D.E.S. (1996). The Use of Adjuvants in Experimental Vaccines. In: Robinson, A., Farrar, G.H., Wiblin, C.N. (eds) Vaccine Protocols. Methods in Molecular Medicine™, vol 4. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-334-1:141

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-334-1:141

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-334-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-588-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics