Immunological Characterization

  • Keith Redhead
Part of the Methods in Molecular Medicine™ book series (MIMM, volume 4)


As part of the assessment of product consistency and putative potency, it is often necessary to check not only that a vaccine contains the desired antigens, but also that they are in the correct immunological form (see Note 1). In general, this immunological characterization of a vaccine is interpreted as the ability of the preparation to invoke an appropriate immune response to its major constitutent antigens. The immune response in question may be in the form of serum antibodies, secretory antibodies, cell-mediated immunity (CMI), or a combination of these. The best approach to characterization of the immune response may be qualitative, such as immunoblotting to check for the presence of antibodies to specific antigens (1), quantitative, such as immunosorbent assays to measure the level of the antibody response to a particular antigen (2), or functional, such as toxin neutralization (3) to assess the magnitude of the functional activity of the response. The nature of the vaccine to be characterized and how its protective efficacy is mediated must be considered when deciding which aspects of the immune response should be examined and how they will be assessed.


Chinese Hamster Ovary Cell Pertussis Toxin Pertussis Vaccine Reference Serum Coating Buffer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Burnette, N. W. (1981) “Western blotting”: electrophoretic transfer of proteins from sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels to unmodified nitrocellulose and radiographic detection with antibody and radiotodinated protein A. Anal. Blochem. 112, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Melville-Smith, M. E., Seagroatt, V. A., and Watkins, J. T. (1983) A comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with the toxin neutralization test in mice as a method for the estimation of tetanus antitoxin in human sera. J. Biol. Stand. 11, 137–144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gillenius, P., Jaatmaa, E., Askelof, P., Granstrom, M., and Tiru, M. (1985) The standardization of an assay for pertussis toxin and antitoxin in microplate culture of Chinese hamster ovary cells. J. Biol. Stand. 13, 61–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Finney, D. J. (1987) Statistical Methods in Biological Assays. Charles Griffin, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc, Totowa, NJ 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keith Redhead
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of BacteriologyNIBSCSouth MimmsUK

Personalised recommendations