Separation of Plant Proteins by Electrophoresis

  • Peter R. Shewry
  • Arthur S. Tatham
  • Roger J. Fido
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 49)

Abstract

Direct identification of the product of a transferred gene is clearly an important part of the characterization of a transgenic plant. It is possible to detect proteins using highly sensitive ELISA techniques ( Chapter 36, this volume), and to determine their precise histological or subcellular locations using immunohistochemistry ( Chapter 37, this volume). However, it is essential that the expressed protein should also be separated by electrophoresis, and detected either by staining or Western blot analysis. Selection of the most suitable electrophoresis system will allow the researcher to determine the M r of the protein in the native and denatured states, its isoelectric point and charge at various pH values, its interactions (via disulfide bonds) with other subunits, and the presence or absence of glycosylation. This will, in fact, confirm whether the protein has been correctly processed, or whether any proteolysis or incorrect post-translational processing has occurred. Furthermore, it is possible to confirm that the protein has the correct N-terminal amino acid sequence by transfer to a PVDF based membrane for microsequencing. The present chapter describes methods for the extraction, electrophoresis, and detection of proteins, and for their transfer to membranes for microsequencing. These can be used for the direct analysis of expressed proteins, or combined with Western blotting as described in the following chapter ( Chapter 35).

Keywords

Sucrose Starch Glycerol Foam Lactate 

References

  1. 1.
    Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 227, 680–685.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davis, B. J. (1964) Disc Electrophoresis—II Method and application to human serum proteins. Ann. NY Acad Sci. 121, 404–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O’Farrell, P. H. (1975) High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of protein. J. Biol Chem. 250, 4007–4021.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blakesley, R. W. and Boezi, J. A. (1977) A new staining technique for proteins in polyacrylamide gels using Coomassie brilliant blue G250. Anal. Biochem. 82, 580–582.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morrissey, J. H. (1981) Silver stain for proteins m polyacrylamide gels: A modified procedure with enhanced uniform sensitivity. Anal. Biochem. 117, 307–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nelson, T., Harpster, M. H., Mayfield, S. P., and Taylor, W C. (1984) Light regulated gene-expression during maize leaf development. J. Cell Biol. 98, 558–564.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Jong, W. W., Zweers, A., and Conen, L. H. (1978) Influence of single amino acid substitutions on electrophoretic mobility of sodium dodecyl sulphate-protein complexes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 82, 532–539.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schägger, H. and von Jagow, G. (1987) Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulphate-poly-acrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 KDa. Anal. Biochem. 166, 368–379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koenig, R., Stegemann, H., Francksen, H., and Paul, H. L. (1970) Protein subunits in the potato virus N group. Determination of the molecular weights by polyacrylamide electrophoresis. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 207, 184–189.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ornstein, L. (1964) Disc Electrophoresrs—I. Background and theory. Ann. NY Acad Sci. 121, 321–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hames, B. D. (1990) In Gel electrophoresis of Proteins: A practical approach, 2nd ed. (Hames, B. D., and Rickwood, D., ed.), IRL Press, Oxford, pp. 1–147.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clements, R L. (1987) A study of gliadins of soft wheats from the Eastern United States using a modified polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis procedure. Cereal Chem. 64, 442–448.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Righetti, P. G., Gianazza, E., Viotti, A., and Soave, C. (1977) Heterogeneity of storage proteins of maize. Planta. 136, 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Farrell, P. Z., Goodman, H. M., and O’Farrell, P. H. (1977) High resolution two dimensional electrophoresis of basic as well as acidic proteins. Cell. 12, 1133–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, C., Levin, A., and Branton, D. (1987) Copper staining. A five-minute protein stain for sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 166, 308–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Neuhoff, V., Arold, N., Taube, D., and Ehrhardt, W. (1988) Improved staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels including Isoelectric focusing gels with clear background at nanogram sensitivity using Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 and R-250. Electrophoresis 9, 255–262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Swrtzer, R. C., Merril, C. R., and Shifrin, S. (1979) A highly sensitive silver stain for detecting proteins and peptides in polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 98, 231–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oakley, B. R., Kirsch, D. R., and Morris, N. R. (1980) A simplified ultrasensitive silver stain for detecting proteins m polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 105, 361–363.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moreno, De M. R., Smith, J. F., and Smith, R. V. (1985) Silver staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels: Increased sensitivity through a combined Coomassie blue-silver stain procedure. Anal. Biochem. 151, 466–470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gottlieb, M. and Chavko, M. (1987) Silver staining of native and denatured eucaryotic DNA in agarose gels. Anal. Biochem. 165, 33–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chuba, P. J. and Palchaudhuri, S. (1986) Requirement for cysteine in the color silver staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 156, 136–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sargent, J. R. and George, S. G. (1975) in Methods in Zone Electrophoresis, BDH Chemicals Ltd., Poole, UK.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zaccharius, R. J., Zell, T. E., Morrison, J. H., and Woodlock, J. J. (1969) Glycoprotein staining following electrophoresis on acrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 31, 148–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yuen, S. W., Chui, A. H., Wilson, K. J., and Yuan, P. M. (1988) Microanalysis of SDS-PAGE electroblotted proteins, in Applied Biosystems Protein Sequences User Bulletin No. 36.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bunce, N. A. C., White, R. P., and Shewry, P. R. (1985) Variation in estimation of molecular weights of cereal prolamins by SDS-PAGE. J. Cereal Sci. 3, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Baker, C. S., Dunn, M. J., and Yacoub, M. H. (1991) Evaluation of membranes used for electroblotting of proteins for direct automated microsequencing. Electrophoresis 12, 342–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter R. Shewry
    • 1
  • Arthur S. Tatham
    • 1
  • Roger J. Fido
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural SciencesUniversity of BristolUK

Personalised recommendations