Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 48))

  • 1211 Accesses

Abstract

Electrofusion has developed into an extremely efficient method for the fusion of mammalian cells. Cell-cell fusion has become an important tool for the study of cell biology, molecular biology, and bioproduction of important biological substances. Although other fusion methodologies have been successfully used, most have inherent disadvantages. Chemical fusogens, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG), are relatively efficient inducers of fusion. However, viability of the resulting cells is reduced owing to the toxicity of the fusogenic chemical (1,2). Alternatively, use of attenuated fusogenic virus (i.e., Sendai) has also provided efficient fusion rates. However, batch-to-batch variability in fusion rates is a significant disadvantage of this technique. Electrofusion provides both extremely efficient fusion rates using a wide variety of mammalian cell types and high postfusion survival. Although the parameters for each new cell type used must be empirically determined, electrofusion can be applied to a wide range of cells because of dielectric properties that can be induced in most cells. Indeed, there are no known electrofusion resistant cells (3,4).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Finaz, C., Lefevre, A., and Teissie, J. (1984) Electrofusion: a new, highly efficient technique for generating somatic cell hybrids. Exp. Cell Res. 150, 477–482.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Haydu, Z., Lazar, G., and Dufits, D. (1977) Increased frequency of polyethylene glycol induced protoplast fusion by dimethylsulfoxide. Plant Sci. Lett. 10, 357–360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stenger, D., Kaler, K. V. I. S., and Hui, S. W. (1991) Dipole interactions in electrofusion: contributions of membrane potential and effective dipole interaction pressures. Biophys. J. 59, 1074–1084.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaler, K. V. I. S. and Jones, T. B. (1990) Dielectrophoretic spectra of single cells determined by feedback-controlled levitation. Biophys. J. 57, 173–182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. White, K. L., Bunch, T. D., Reed, W. A., Wang, S., and Yue, C. (1993) Bovine oocyte activation is mediated by IP3-sensitive intracellular calcium pools. Biol. Reprod. Suppl. 1, 346.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Collas, P., Blaise, J. J., and Robl, J. M. (1992) Influence of cell cycle stage of the donor nucleus on development of nuclear transplant rabbit embryos. Biol. Reprod. 46, 492–500.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith, L. C., and Wilmut, I. (1989) Influence of nuclear and cytoplasmic activity on the development in vivo of sheep embryos after nuclear transplantation. Biol. Reprod. 40, 1027–1035.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rickords, L. F. and White, K. L. (1992) Effect of electrofusion pulse in either electrolyte or nonelectrolyte fusion medium on subsequent murine embryonic dlvelopment. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 32, 259–264.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ohnishi, K., Chiba, J., Goto, Y., and Tokunaga, T. (1987) Improvement in the basic technology of electrofusion for generation of antibody-producing hybridomas. J. Immunol. Methods 100, 181–189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Takahashi, Y., Suzuki, K., Numura, T., Kano, T., and Takashima, S. (1991) A production of monoclonal antibodies by a simple electrofusion technique induced by AC pulses. Biotech. Bioeng. 37, 790–794.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmitt, J. J., Zimmermann, U., and Neil, G. A. (1988) Efficient generation of stable antibody forming hybridoma cells by electrofusion. Hybridoma 8, 107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zimmermann, U., Gessner, P., Wander, M., and Foung, S. K. H. (1990) Electro-injection and electrofusion in hypo-osmolar solution, in Electromanipulation in Hybridoma (Borrebaeck, C. and Hagen, I., eds.), Stockton, New York, pp. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Glassy, M. (1988) Creating hybridomas by electrofusion. Nature 333, 579–580.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Burt, P. H., Pethig, R., Gascoyne, P. R. C., and Becker, F. F (1990) Dielectrophoretic characterization of friend murine erythroleukaemic cells as a measure of induced differentiation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1034, 93–101.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Willadsen, S. M. (1986) Nuclear transplantation in sheep embryos. Nature 320, 63–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sukharev, S. I., Bandrina, I. N., Barbul, A. I., Fedorova, L. I., Abidor, I. G., and Zelenin, A. V. (1990) Electrofusion of fibroblasts on the porous membrane. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1034, 125–131.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dimitrov, D. S., and Sowers, A. E. (1990) Membrane electroporation—fast molecular exchange by electroosmosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1022, 381–392.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zimmermann, U. (1986) Electrical breakdown, electropermeabilization and electrofusion. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 105, 75–256.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zimmermann, U. (1987) Electrofusion of cells, in Methods of Hybridoma Formation (Bartal, A. H. and Hirshaut, Y., eds.), Humana, Clifton, NJ, pp. 97–147.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pratt, M., Mikhalev, A., and Glassy, M. C. (1987) The generation of Ig-secreting UC 729-6 derived human hybridomas by electrofusion. Hybridoma 6, 469–477.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Iwasaki, S., Kono, T., Fukatsu, H., and Nakahara, T. (1989) Production of bovine tetraploid embryos by electrofusion and their developmental capability in vitro. Gamete Res. 24, 261–267.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kowalski, M., Hannig, K., Klock, G., Gessner, P., Zimmermann, U., Neil, G. A., and Sammons, D. W. (1990) Electrofused mammalian cells analyzed by free-flow electrophoresis. Biotechniques 9, 332–341.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Prather, R. S., Sims, M. M., and First, N. L (1989) Nuclear transplantation in early pig embryos. Biol. Reprod. 41, 414–418.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rickords, L. F., and White, K. L. (1992) Electrofusion-induced intracellular Ca+2 flux and its effect on murine oocyte activation. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 31, 152–159.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaufman, M. H., and Webb, S. (1990) Postimplantation development of tetraploid mouse embryos produced by electrofusion. Development 110, 1121–1132.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rickords, L. F., White, K. L., and Wiltbank, J. N. (1990) Effect of microinjection and two types of electrical stimuli on bovine sperm-hamster egg penetration. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 27, 163–167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Minhas, B. S., and Kim, H. (1994) Electroporation of microsurgically fertilized murine oocytes. Biomed. Prod. 22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Podesta, E. J., Solano, A. R., Molina, Y., Vedia, L., Paladini, A., Jr., Sanchez, M. L., and Torres, H. N. (1984) Production of steroid hormone and cyclic AMP in hybrids of adrenal and Leydig cells generated by electrofusion. Eur. J. Biochem. 145, 329–332.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Humana Press Inc.

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

White, K.L. (1995). Electrofusion of Mammalian Cells. In: Nickoloff, J.A. (eds) Animal Cell Electroporation and Electrofusion Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 48. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-304-X:283

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-304-X:283

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-304-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-535-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics