Skip to main content

Analysis of Chromosomes with Restriction Endonucleases and DNase Hypersensitivity

  • Protocol
Chromosome Analysis Protocols

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology™ ((MIMB,volume 29))

Abstract

The introduction of chromosome banding techniques about 20 years ago has not only provided a very powerful tool for chromosome identification, but has also highlighted structural and functional differences between different chromosomal segments (1). Restriction endonucleases (RE) have been widely used to study some aspects of chromosome organization (24). The original methods, involving digestion followed by Giemsa or ethidium bromide (EB) staining, lack both specificity and sensitivity. It is now clear that the Giemsa/EB staining does not necessarily represent the distribution of restriction sites along the chromosomes; other factors, such as the accessibility of the REs to the targets or the extractability of the DNA fragments produced, need to be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sumner, A T (1990) Chromosome Banding Unwin Hyman Ltd., London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mezzanotte, R, Ferrucci, L, Vanni, R., and Bianchi, U. (1983) Selective diges ion of human metaphase chromosomes by Alul restriction endonuclease J Histochem. Cytochem 31, 553–556.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mezzanotte, R., Bianchi, U., Vanni, R., and Ferrucci, L (1983) Chromatin rganisation and restriction endonuclease activity on human metaphase chromosomes Cytogenet Cell Genet. 36, 562–566.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller, D A, Choi, Y C, and Miller, O. J (1983) Chromosome localisation f highly repetitive human DNA’s and amplified ribosomal DNA with restriction enzymes. Science 219, 395–397.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bianchi, M. S., Bianchi, N. O, Pantehas, G. E, and Wolf, S (1985) The mechanism and pattern of banding induced by restriction endonucleases in human hromosomes. Chromosoma 91, 131–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Babu, A., Agrawal, A K., and Verma, R. S (1988) A new approach in recognition of heterochromatic regions of human chromosomes by means of restriction endonucleases Am J Hum Genet. 42, 60–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaelbling, M., Miller, D. A., and Miller, O. J (1984) Restriction enzyme banding of mouse metaphase chromosomes. Chromosoma 90, 128–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mezzanotte, R, Manconi, P E., Rozzo, C, Ennas, M. G., and Ferrucci, L (1985) The banding pattern produced by restriction endonucleases in mouse hromosomes Basic Appl. Histochem 29, 115–120.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Frediani, M., Mezzanotte, R., Vanni, R, Pignone, D., and Cremonini, R (1987) he biochemical and cytological characterization of Vicia faba DNA by means f MboI, Alul and BamHI restriction endonucleases Theor Appl Genet 75, 6–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gosálvez, J., Bella, J L., Lopez-Fernandez, C, and Mezzanotte, R (1987) Correlation between constitutive heterochromatin and restriction enzyme resistant chromatin in Arcyptera tornosi (Orthoptera). Heredity 59, 173–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmid, M and Almeida, C G. (1988) Chromosome banding in Amphibia XII. Restriction endonuclease banding. Chromosoma 96, 283–290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cau, A, Salvadori, S, Deiana, A M., Bella, J. L, and Mezzanotte, R. (1988) The characterization of Muraena helena L. mitotic chromosomes karyotype, C-banding, nucleolar organizer regions, and in situ digestion with restriction endonucleases Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 47, 223–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. López-Fernandez, C, Gosalvez, J., Suja, J. A, and Mezzanotte, R (1988) Restriction endonuclease digestion of meiotic and mitotic chromosomes in Pyrgomorpha conica (Orthoptera. Pyrgomorphidae) Genome 30, 621–626

    Google Scholar 

  14. López-Fernandez, C, Gosalvez, J, and Mezzanotte, R. (1989) Heterochroma-tin heterogeneity in Oedipoda germanica (Orthoptera) detected by in situ digestion with restriction endonucleases Heredity 62, 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mezzanotte, R. (1986) The selective digestion of polytene and mitotic chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster by the Alul and Haelll restriction endonucleases Chromosoma 93, 249–255.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mezzanotte, R., Bianchi, U., and Marchi, A. (1987) In situ digestion of Drosophila virilis polytene chromosomes by Alul and Haelll restriction endonucleases, Genome 29, 630–634.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bianchi, N O., Vidal-Rioja, L., and Cleaver, J. E. (1986) Direct visualization of the sites of DNA methylation in human and mosquito chromosomes Chromsoma 94, 362–366.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gosálvez, J. and Goyanes, V. (1988) Selective digestion of mouse chromosomes with restriction endonucleases. I Scaffold-like structures and bands by electron microscopy. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 48, 198–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gosálvez, J, Sumner, A. T, Lopez-Fernandez, C, Rossino, R, Goyanes, V, and Mezzanotte, R. (1990) Electron microscopy and biochemical analysis of mouse metaphase chromosomes after digestion with restriction endonucleases Chromosoma 99, 36–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. de la Torre, J., Mitchell, A R., and Sumner, A. T (1991) Restriction endonuclease/ nick translation of fixed mouse chromosomes, a study of factors affecting digestion of chromosomal DNA in situ. Chromosoma 100, 203–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Viegas-Péquignot, E., Dutrillaux, B., and Thomas, G. (1988) Inactive X chromosome has the highest concentration of unmethylated Hhal sites. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 85, 7657–7660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Adolph, S. and Hameister, H. (1990) In situ nick translation of human metaphase chromosomes with the restriction enzymes MspI and HpaII reveals an R-band pattern. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 54, 132–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sumner, A. T., Taggart, M., Mezzanotte, R., and Ferrucci, L. (1990) Patterns of digestion on human chromosomes by restriction endonucleases demonstrated by in situ nick translation. Histochem J 22, 639–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Herrero, P, Bella, J L., and Arano, B. (1989) Characterization of heterochromatic regions in two Triturus alpestris subspecies (Urodela Salamandridae) Heredity 63, 119–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. de la Torre, J, Lopez-Fernandez, C, Herrero, P, and Gosalves, J (1993) In situ nick translation of meiotic chromosomes to demonstrate homologous heterochromatin heterogeneity. Genome 36, in press

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bullerdiek, J, Dittmer, J, Faehre, A., Bartnitzke, S., Kasche, V., and Schloot, W. (1985) A new banding pattern of human chromosomes by in situ nick translation using EcoRI and biotin-dUTP. Clin Genet. 28, 173–176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bullerdiek, J., Dittmer, J., Faehre, A., and Bartnitzke, S (1986) Mechanism of in situ nick translation of chromosomes using restriction endonucleases. Cytobios 47, 33–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Adolph, S. (1988) In situ nick translation distinguishes between C-band positive regions on mouse chromosomes. Chromosoma 96, 102–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. de la Torre, J., Sumner, A. T, Gosalves, J., and Stuppia, L. (1992) The distribution of genes on human chromosomes as studied by in situ nick translation Genome 35, 890–894

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Weintraub, H. and Groudine, M. (1976).Chromosomal subunits in active genes have an altered conformation. Science 93, 848–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gazit, B., Cedar, H., Lerer, I., and Voss, R. (1982) Active genes are sensitive to deoxyribonuclease I during metaphase. Science 217, 648–650.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kerem, B S, Goitein, R, Diamond, G., Cedar, H., and Marcus, M. (1984) Mapping of DNAseI sensitive regions on mitotic chromosomes. Cell 38, 493–499.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Adolph, S and Hameister, H (1985) In situ nick translation of metaphase chromosomes with biotinlabelled d-UTP Hum. Genet 69, 117–121.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Murer-Orlando, M L and Peterson, A C (1985) In situ nick translation of human and mouse chromosomes detected with a biotinylated nucleotide. Exp. Cell Res. 157, 322–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kerem, B. S, Goitein, R, Richler, C, Marcus, M, and Cedar, H. (1983) In situ nick translation distinguishes between active and inactive X chromosomes. Nature 304, 88–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. L6pez-Fernandez, C, Gosalvez, J., Ferrucci, L, and Mezzanotte, R. (1991) Restriction endonucleases in the study of eukaryotic chromosomes Genetica 83, 257–274.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Macgregor, H and Varley, J (1988) Working with Animal Chromosomes, 2nd. ed., Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gallyas, F, Gorcs, T., and Merchenthaler, I. (1982) High-grade intensification of the end-product of the diaminobenzidine reaction for peroxidase histochemistry. J Histochem. Cytochem. 30, 183–184.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Burns, J, Chan, V. T W, Jonasson, J. A., Fleming, K. A., Taylor, S., and McGee, J. O. D (1985) Sensitive system for visualising biotinylated DNA probes hybridised in situ-a rapid sex determination of intact cells. J. Clin. Pathol 38, 1085–1092

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ferrucci, L, Romano, E, and De Stefano, G. F. (1987) The Alu-induced bands in great apes and man: implications for heterochromatin characterization and satellite DNA distribution. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 44, 53–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Burkholder, G. (1989) Morphological and biochemical effects of endonucleases on isolated mammalian chromosomes “in vitro.” Chromosoma 97, 347–355.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Southern, E. M (1975) Long range periodicities in mouse satellite J Mol. Biol. 94, 51–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Humana Press Inc, Totowa, NJ

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Torre, J.d.l., Sumner, A.T. (1994). Analysis of Chromosomes with Restriction Endonucleases and DNase Hypersensitivity. In: Gosden, J.R. (eds) Chromosome Analysis Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 29. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-289-2:123

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-289-2:123

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-289-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-516-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics