Advertisement

Differential In-Gel Electrophoresis in a High-Throughput Environment

  • Richard I. Somiari
  • Stephen Russell
  • Stella B. Somiari
  • Anthony G. Sullivan
  • Darrell L. Ellsworth
  • Henry Brzeski
  • Craig D. Shriver
Protocol
Part of the Springer Protocols Handbooks book series (SPH)

Abstract

Proteomics deals with the large-scale analysis of proteins expressed by the genome of an organism. In general, the aim is to search for qualitative and quantitative changes in protein expression that occur as a function of development, disease, environmental insults, or treatment. Because of the complexity of the proteome of most organisms, the complete and rapid mapping of protein expression changes and characterization of posttranslational modifications is challenging and will require an analytical effort that exceeds the technology and throughput that exist in most standard biochemistry laboratories (1 While novel automated methods for rapid separation and analysis of proteins are being evaluated in many laboratories, it is widely accepted that twodimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) is still the benchmark for large-scale separation of complex protein mixtures. The availability of standard reagents and equipment, and development of many modifications of the 2-DE process, have led to remarkable improvements in reproducibility (2,3). However, it is still difficult to fully duplicate the pattern of protein expression using conventional 2-DE methods (4,5), particularly when conducting multiple comparative and quantitative proteomics experiments in a high-throughput research environment where reproducibility and speed are critically important parameters.

Keywords

Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Protein Spot Equilibration Buffer Picking List Spot Picker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Somiari, R. I., Sullivan, A., Russell, S., et al. (2003) High throughput proteomic analysis of infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast. Proteomics 10(3), 1863–1873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bjellqvist, B., Sanchez, J. C., Pasquali, C., et al. (1993) Micropreparative two-dimensional electrophoresis allowing the separation of samples containing milligram amounts of proteins. Electrophoresis 14, 1375–1378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rabilloud, T. (1994) Two-dimensional electrophoresis of basic proteins with equilibrium isoelectric focusing in carrier ampholyte-pH gradients Electrophoresis 15, 278–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhou, G., Li, H., DeCamp, D., et al. (2002) 2D differential in-gel electrophoresis for the identification of esophageal scans cell cancer-specific protein markers. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1.2, 117–124Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Von Eggeling, F., Gawriljuk, A., Fiedler, W., et al. (2001) Fluorescent dual colour 2D-protein gel electrophoresis for rapid detection of differences in protein pattern with standard image analysis software. Inter. J. Mol. Med. 8, 373–377.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Westermeier, R. and Naven, T. (2002) Proteomics in practice: A laboratory manual of protein analysis. Weiley-VCH Verlag-GmbH, Weinheim, p. 316.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Unlu, M., Morgan, M. E., and Minden, J. S. (1997) Difference gel electrophoresis: a single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts. Electrophoresis 18, 2071–2077.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tonge, R., Shaw, J., Middleton, B., et al. (2001) Validation and development of fluorescence two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis proteomics technology. Proteomics 1(3), 377–396.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gharbi, S., Gaffney, P., Yang, A., et al. (2002) Evaluation of two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis for proteomic expression analysis of a model breast cancer cell system. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1(2), 91–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard I. Somiari
    • 1
  • Stephen Russell
    • 2
  • Stella B. Somiari
    • 3
  • Anthony G. Sullivan
    • 4
  • Darrell L. Ellsworth
    • 5
  • Henry Brzeski
    • 6
  • Craig D. Shriver
    • 7
  1. 1.Thermoelectron Training InstituteWest Palm Beach
  2. 2.Functional Genomics and Protemics UnitITSI-BiosciencesJohnstown
  3. 3.Functional Genomics and Protemics UnitWindber Research InstituteWindber
  4. 4.Windber Research InstituteWindber
  5. 5.Functional Genomics and Proteomics UnitWindber Research InstituteWindber
  6. 6.Cardiovascular Disease Research Program and Clinical Breast Care ProjectWindber Research InstituteWindber
  7. 7.Functional Genomics and Proteomics UnitWindber Research InstituteWindber

Personalised recommendations