Advertisement

Chemical Cleavage of Proteins at Aspartyl-X Peptide Bonds

  • Bryan John Smith
Protocol
Part of the Springer Protocols Handbooks book series (SPH)

Abstract

Some methods for chemically cleaving proteins, such as those described in Chapters 71 and 72, are fairly specific for a particular residue, show good yields, and generate usefully large peptides (as reaction occurs at relatively rare amino acid residues). There may be cases, however, when such peptides (or indeed, proteins) lacking these rarer residues need to be further fragmented, and in such instances cleavage at the more common aspartyl residue may prove useful. The method described in this chapter (and in ref. 1) for cleavage to the carboxy-(C)-terminal side of aspartyl residues is best limited to smaller polypeptides rather than larger proteins because yields are<100% and somewhat variable according to sequence. Partial cleavage of Asp-X bonds in a larger protein leads to a very complex set of peptides that may be difficult to analyze. Partial hydrolysis of smaller peptides yields correspondingly simpler mixtures. This may even be preferable to complete fragmentation for some purposes, such as peptide sequencing or mass spectrometry whereby the series of overlapping peptides may be used to order the peptides in the protein sequence (as in ref. 2 in which partial cleavage at methionyl-X bonds by CNBr was used).

Keywords

Small Polypeptide Partial Cleavage Complete Fragmentation Terminal Side Aspartyl Residue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Ingris, A. S. (1983) Cleavage at aspartic acid. Meth. Enzymol. 91, 324–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beavis, R. C., and Chait, B. T. (1990) Rapid, sensitive analysis of protein mixtures by mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 6873–6877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Landon, M. (1977) Cleavage at aspartyl-prolyl bonds. Meth. Enzymol. 47, 132–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morrison, J. R., Fiolge, N. H., and Grego, B. (1990) Studies on the formation, separation and characterisation of CNBr fragments of human A1 apolipoprotein. Analyt. Biochem. 186, 145–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schulz, A., Marx U. C., Hidaka, Y., Shimonishi, Y., Rosch, P., Forssmann, W.-G., and Adermann, K. (1999) Role of the prosequence of guanylin. Protein Science, 8, 1850–1859.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Correia, J. J., Lipscomb, L. D., and Lobert, S. (1993) Nondisulfide crosslinking and chemi-cal cleavage of tubulin subunits: pH and temperature dependence. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 300, 105–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu, W., Vath, J. E., Huberty, M. C., and Martin, S. A. (1993) Identification of the facile gas-phase cleavage of the Asp-Pro and Asp-Xxx peptide bonds in matrix-assisted laser desorption time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Analyt. Chem., 65, 3015–3023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bryan John Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Celltech, R&DSloughUK

Personalised recommendations