Advertisement

Preparation of Tissue Sections and Slides for mRNA Hybridization

  • Giorgio Terenghi
Protocol
  • 92 Downloads
Part of the Springer Protocols Handbooks book series (SPH)

Abstract

The first step for a successful in situ hybridization is the fixation of the tissue. This will ensure target nucleic acid retention and preservation of the tissue morphology. Either crosslinking or precipitative fixatives can be used, and a preference for either of the two types of fixative has often been based on the different types of system under investigation (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). For hybridization of regulatory peptide mRNA, 4% paraformaldehyde appears to be the most effective, both on tissue blocks and on tissue culture preparations.

Keywords

Tissue Block Tissue Adhesion Coated Slide Fixed Material mRNA Hybridization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Haase, A. T., Brahic, M., and Stowring, L. (1984) Detection of viral nucleic acids by in situ hybridization, in Methods in Virology, vol. VII (Maramorosch, K. and Koprowski, H., eds.), Academic, New York, pp. 189–226.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McAllister, H. A. and Rock, D. L. (1985) Comparative usefulness of tissue fixatives for in situ viral nucleic acid hybridization. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 33, 1026–1032.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moench, T. R., Gendelman, H. E., Clements, J. E., Narayan, O., and Griffin, D. E. (1985) Efficiency of in situ hybridization as a function of probe size and fixation technique. J. Virol Method. 11, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hofler, H., Childers, H., Montminy, M. R., Lechan, R. M., Goodman, R. H., and Wolfe, H. J. (1986) In situ hybridization methods for the detection of somatostatin mRNA in tissue sections using antisense RNA probes. Histochem. J. 18, 597–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Singer, R. H., Lawrence, J. B., and Villnave, C. (1986) Optimization of in situ hybridization using isotopic and non-isotopic detection methods. BioTechniques 4, 230–250.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guitteny, A. F., Fouque, B., Mongin, C., Teoule, R., and Boch, B. (1988) Histological detection of mRNA with biotinylated synthetic oligonucleotide probes. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 36, 563–571.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Terenghi, G. and Fallon, R. A. (1990) Techniques and applications of in situ hybridization, in Current Topics in Pathology: Pathology of the Nucleus (Underwood, J. C. E., ed.), Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 290–337.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Farquharson, M., Harvie, R., and McNicol, A. M. (1990) Detection of mRNA using a digoxigenin end labelled oligodeoxynucleotide probe. J. Clin. Pathol. 43, 424–428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Unger, E. R., Hammer, M. I., and Chenggis, M. L. (1991) Comparison of 35S and biotin as labels for in situ hybridization: use of an HPV model system. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 39, 145–150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Asanuma, M., Ogawa, N., Mizukawa, K., Haba, K., and Mori, A. (1990) A comparison of formaldehyde-preperfused frozen and freshly frozen tissue preparation for the in situ hybridization for α-tubulin mRNA in the rat brain. Res. Comm. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 70, 183–192.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giorgio Terenghi
    • 1
  1. 1.Blond Mclndoe Laboratories, University Department of Surgery, Royal Free and University College Medical SchoolUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations