Advertisement

Making High Titer Retroviral Producer Cells

  • Stephen J. Russell
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 8)

Abstract

Retroviral vectors are uniquely suitable for high-efficiency gene transfer to a large target cell population and this (among other things) has led to the exploration of previously impractical strategies for somatic gene therapy (1,2). Thus, for example, cultured bone marrow can be used to recolonize mice with hematopoietic progenitors expressing a variety of genes after retroviral gene transfer (3), and efforts to achieve the same with human bone marrow may eventually result in effective therapies for sickle cell anemia, the thalassemias, and a variety of other single-gene disorders. The major factors limiting the success of this type of experiment are the maximum achievable concentration of recombinant virus particles, the density of virus receptors on the target cell population (which must be actively proliferating, since the processes of reverse transcription and integration are S-phase-dependent) and the emergence of replication-competent “helper virus” in the system.

Keywords

Viral Titer NIH3T3 Fibroblast Helper Virus Packaging Cell Line Target Cell Population 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Friedmann, T. (1989) Progress toward human gene therapy. Science 244, 1275–1281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Temin, H. M. (1989) Retrovirus vectors: Promise and reality. Science 246, 983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dzierzak, E. A., Papayannopoulou, T., and Mulligan, R. C. (1988) Lineage-specific expression of a human P-globin gene in m urine bone marrow transplant recipients reconstituted with retrovirus-transduced stem cells. Nature 331, 35–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rein, A. and Schultz, A. M. (1984) Different recombinant murine leukemia viruses use different surface receptors. Virology 136, 144–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Southern, E. M. (1975) Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J. Mol Biol. 98, 503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feinberg, A. P. and Vogelstein, B. (1983) A technique for radiolabelling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal. Biochem. 132, 6–13, and addendum 133, 266–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bestwick, R. K, Kozak, S. L., and Rabat, D. (1988) Overcoming interference to retroviral superinfection results in amplified expression and transmission of cloned genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 5404–5408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Muenchau, D. D., Freeman, S. M., Cornetta, K, Zwiebel, J. A., and French Anderson W. (1990) Analysis of retroviral packaging lines for generation of replication-competent virus. Virology 176, 262–265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bodine, D. M., McDonagh, K. T., Brandt, S. J., Ney, P. A., Agricola, B., Byrne, E., and Nienhuis, A. W. (1990) Development of a high-titer retrovirus producer cell line capable of gene transfer into rhesus monkey haematopoietic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 3738–3742.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Humana Press Inc., Clifton, NJ 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen J. Russell
    • 1
  1. 1.Chester Beatty LaboratoriesInstitute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK

Personalised recommendations