Solutions for Patch-Clamp Experiments

  • Ravshan Z. Sabirov
  • Shigeru Morishima
Part of the Springer Protocols Handbooks book series (SPH)


Solutions used in patch-clamp can be divided into two general categories by the side of the patch membrane with which the solution is in contact. The compositions of extracellular solutions are usually similar to those of the natural extracellular fluids, whereas intracellular solutions resemble cytosol with respect to pH, free Ca2+, and Mg2+ concentrations and ATP content. Designing solutions for patch-clamp experiments requires careful consideration of the physicochemical processes controlling the concentrations of protons and divalent cations, ionic strength, and osmotic pressure. Liquid junction potentials arising at the interfaces between different experimental solutions may contribute to the membrane potential and should be measured or calculated and adequately compensated. This chapter describes general strategies and methods for practical calculations of these parameters, which are critically important for successful patch-clamp experiments.


Ionic Strength Bath Solution Association Constant Pipette Solution Junction Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Prosser CL (1973) Inorganic ions. In: Ladd Prosser C (ed) Comparative animal physiology. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 79–110Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sabirov RZ, Okada Y, Oiki S (1997) Two-sided action of protons on an inward rectifier K+ channel (IRK1). Pflugers Arch 433:428–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sabirov RZ, Prenen J, Droogmans G, Nilius B (2000) Extra- and intracellular proton-binding sites of volume-regulated anion channels. J Membr Biol 177:13–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tsai TD, Shuck ME, Thompson DP, Bienkowski MJ, Lee KS (1995) Intracellular H+ inhibits a cloned rat kidney outer medulla K+ channel expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Am J Physiol 268:C1173–C1178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robinson RA, Stokes RH (1959) Electrolyte solutions. Butterworths, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miller DJ, Smith GL (1984) EGTA purity and the buffering of calcium ions in physiological solutions. Am J Physiol 246:C160–C166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oiki S, Yamamoto T, Okada Y (1994) Apparent stability constants and purity of Ca-chelating agents evaluated using Ca-selective electrodes by the double-log optimization method. Cell Calcium 15:209–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oiki S, Yamamoto T, Okada Y (1994) A simultaneous evaluation method of purity and apparent stability constant of Ca-chelating agents and selectivity coefficient of Ca- selective electrodes. Cell Calcium 15:199–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harrison SM, Bers DM (1987) The effect of temperature and ionic strength on the apparent Ca- affinity of EGTA and the analogous Ca-chelators BAPTA and dibromo-BAPTA. Biochim Biophys Acta 925:133–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harrison SM, Bers DM (1989) Correction of proton and Ca association constants of EGTA for temperature and ionic strength. Am J Physiol 256:C1250–C1256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith GL, Miller DJ (1985) Potentiometric measurements of stoichiometric and apparent affinity constants of EGTA for protons and divalent ions including calcium. Biochim Biophys Acta 839:287–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fabiato A (1988) Computer programs for calculating total from specified free or free from specified total ionic concentrations in aqueous solutions containing multiple metals and ligands. Methods Enzymol 157:378–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Neher E (1992) Correction for liquid junction potentials in patch clamp experiments. Methods Enzymol 207:123–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D’Ans J, Surawsky H, Synowietz C (1977) In: Schafer Kl (ed) Densities of liquid systems and their heat capacities, Landolt-Bornstein numerical data and functional relationships in science and technology. New Series. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barry PH, Lynch JW (1991) Liquid junction potentials and small cell effects in patch-clamp analysis. J Membr Biol 121:101–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Molecular PhysiologyInstitute of Physiology and Biophysics, Uzbekistan Academy of SciencesTashkentUzbekistan
  2. 2.Department of BiophysicsNational UniversityTashkentUzbekistan
  3. 3.Division of Pharmacology, Department of Biochemistry and Bioinformative SciencesSchool of Medicine, University of Fukui, Faculty of Medical SciencesFukuiJapan

Personalised recommendations