Heterologous Expression Systems and Analyses of Ion Channels

Part of the Springer Protocols Handbooks book series (SPH)


This chapter describes practical techniques for electrophysiological experiments in the heterologous expression systems using mammalian cell cultures and Xenopus laevis oocytes. These two experimental systems are the most commonly used for expression of ion channels and transporters, contributing to numerous discoveries of their function and molecular properties. When planning an experiment, researchers need to determine whether either system is appropriate for use. It is crucial to understand the advantages and disadvantages of each system. The practical techniques discussed here include preparation of cells, heterologous expression of ion channel and other proteins, and the electrophysiological techniques available for recording from these systems. Also, we show the applications of these systems to analyses of K+ channels.


Calcium Phosphate Xenopus Oocyte High Transfection Efficiency Heterologous Expression System Vitelline Membrane 


  1. 1.
    Felgner PL, Gadek TR, Holm M et al (1987) Lipofection: a highly efficient, lipid-mediated DNA-transfection procedure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:7413–7417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hibino H, Inanobe A, Furutani K et al (2010) Inwardly rectifying potassium channels: their structure, function, and physiological roles. Physiol Rev 90:291–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Furutani K, Ohno Y, Inanobe A et al (2009) Mutational and in silico analyses for antidepressant block of astroglial inward-rectifier Kir4.1 channel. Mol Pharmacol 75:1287–1295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ohno Y, Hibino H, Lossin C et al (2007) Inhibition of astroglial Kir4.1 channels by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Brain Res 1178:44–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Su S, Ohno Y, Lossin C et al (2007) Inhibition of astroglial inwardly rectifying Kir4.1 channels by a tricyclic antidepressant, nortriptyline. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 320:573–580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gundersen CB, Miledi R, Parker I (1983) Voltage-operated channels induced by foreign messenger RNA in Xenopus oocytes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 220:131–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gurdon JB, Lane CD, Woodland HR et al (1971) Use of frog eggs and oocytes for the study of messenger RNA and its translation in living cells. Nature 233:177–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sumikawa K, Houghton M, Emtage JS et al (1981) Active multi-subunit ACh receptor assembled by translation of heterologous mRNA in Xenopus oocytes. Nature 292:862–864PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Conforti L, Sperelakis N (2001) The patch-clamp technique for measurement of K+ channels in Xenopus oocytes and mammalian expression systems. In: Archer SL, Rusch NJ (eds) Potassium channels in cardiovascular biology. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dascal N (2001) Voltage clamp recordings from Xenopus oocytes. Curr Protoc Neurosci Chapter 6: Unit 6.12Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smart TG, Krishek BJ (1995) Xenopus oocyte microinjection and ion-channel expression. In: Boulton AA, Baker GB, Walz W (eds) Patch-clamp applications and protocols. Humana Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goldin AL (1992) Maintenance of Xenopus laevis and oocyte injection. Methods Enzymol 207:266–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dumont JN (1972) Oogenesis in Xenopus laevis (Daudin) I. Stages of oocyte development in laboratory maintained animals. J Morphol 136:153–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goldin AL, Sumikawa K (1992) Preparation of RNA for injection into Xenopus oocytes. Methods Enzymol 207:279–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Soreq H, Seidman S (1992) Xenopus oocyte microinjection: from gene to protein. Methods Enzymol 207:225–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stuhmer W (1992) Electrophysiological recording from Xenopus oocytes. Methods Enzymol 207:319–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Choe H, Sackin H (1997) Improved preparation of Xenopus oocytes for patch-clamp recording. Pflugers Arch 433:648–652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Methfessel C, Witzemann V, Takahashi T et al (1986) Patch clamp measurements on Xenopus laevis oocytes: currents through endogenous channels and implanted acetylcholine receptor and sodium channels. Pflugers Arch 407:577–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E et al (1981) Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-­resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch 391:85–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barish ME (1983) A transient calcium-dependent chloride current in the immature Xenopus oocyte. J Physiol 342:309–325PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miledi R (1982) A calcium-dependent transient outward current in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 215:491–497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schroeder BC, Cheng T, Jan YN et al (2008) Expression cloning of TMEM16A as a calcium-activated chloride channel subunit. Cell 134:1019–1029PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lu L, Montrose-Rafizadeh C, Hwang TC et al (1990) A delayed rectifier potassium current in Xenopus oocytes. Biophys J 57:1117–1123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lopatin AN, Makhina EN, Nichols CG (1998) A novel crystallization method for visualizing the membrane localization of potassium channels. Biophys J 74:2159–2170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yamada M, Inanobe A, Kurachi Y (1998) G protein regulation of potassium ion channels. Pharmacol Rev 50:723–760PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pharmacology, Graduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversitySuitaJapan

Personalised recommendations