Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Protocols Handbooks ((SPH))

It is well known that chromosome in situ hybridization allows the unequivocal identification of targeted human somatic chromosomes. Different fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques have been developed over the years and, following mitotic studies, meiotic analyses have been performed using these different techniques. The application of FISH protocols to meiotic cells requires the adaptation of standard protocols to the particularities of these cells. Specific sample fixation is usually required, and in some cases samples need to go through particular pretreatments to guarantee successful FISH. The application of FISH to meiotic cytogenetic research has proven to be very useful and has provided significant information about many of the processes that take place during human gametogenesis. The protocols described in this chapter illustrate the processing of different meiotic samples as well as the FISH procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Armstrong S, Goldman A, Speed R, Hultén M (2000) Meiotic studies of a human male carrier of the common translocation, t(11;22), suggests postzygotic selection rather than preferential 3:1 MI segregation as the cause of liveborn offspring with an unbalanced translocation. Am J Hum Genet 67:601–609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow AL, Hulten MA (1998) Combined immunocytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic analysis of meiosis I oocytes from normal human females. Zygote 6:27–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco J, Egozcue J, Vidal F (1996) Incidence of chromosome 21 disomy in human spermatozoa as determined by fluorescent in-situ hybridization. Hum Reprod 11:722–726

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Codina-Pascual M, Campillo M, Kraus J, Speicher MR, Egozcue J, Navarro J, Benet J (2006) Crossover frequency and synaptonemal complex length: Their variability and effects on human male meiosis. Mol Hum Reprod doi:10.1093/molehr/gal007

    Google Scholar 

  • Durban M, Benet J, Sarquella J, Egozcue J, Navarro J (1998) Chromosome studies in first polar bodies from hamster and human oocytes. Hum Reprod 13:583–587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durban M, Benet J, Boada M, Fernandez E, Calafell JM, Lailla JM, Sanchez-Garcia JF, Pujol A, Egozcue J, Navarro J (2001) PGD in female carriers of balanced Robertsonian and reciprocal translocations by first polar body analysis. Hum Reprod Update 7:591–602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans EP, Breckon G, Ford CE (1964) An air-drying method for meiotic preparations from mammalian testes. Cytogenetics 15:289–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman A, Hultén M (1993) Analysis of chiasma frequency and first meiotic segregation in a human male reciprocal translocation heterozygote, t(1;11)(p36.3;q13.1), using fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Cytogenet Cell Genet 63:16–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman AS, Hulten MA (1992) Chromosome in situ suppression hybridisation in human male meiosis. J Med Genet 29:98–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ko E, Rademaker A, Martin R (2001) Microwave decondensation and codenaturation: A new methodology to maximize FISH data from donors with very low concentrations of sperm. Cytogenet Cell Genet 95:143–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y (2004) Meiotic and mitotic nondisjunction: Lessons from preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod Update 10:401–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn A, Koehler KE, Judis L, Chan ER, Cherry JP, Schwartz S, Seftel A, Hunt P, Hassold TJ (2002) Covariation of synaptonemal complex length and mammalian meiotic exchange rates. Science 296:2222–2225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin R, Greene C, Rademaker A, Barclay L, Ko E, Chernos J (2000) Chromosome analysis of spermatozoa extracted from testes of men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 15:1121–1124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Flores I, Cabero LL, Egozcue J, Garcia M (2003) Synaptic process in the rat (Rattus norvegicus): Influence of methodology on results. Microsc Res Tech 60:450–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moradkhani K, Puechberty J, Bhatt S, Lespinasse J, Vago P, Lefort G, Sarda P, Hamamah S, Pellestor F (2006) Rare Robertsonian translocations and meiotic behaviour: Sperm FISH analysis of t(13;15) and t(14;15) translocations: A case report. Hum Reprod 21:3193–3198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Munne S, Escudero T, Sandalinas M, Sable D, Cohen J (2000) Gamete segregation in female carriers of Robertsonian translocations. Cytogenet Cell Genet 90:303–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver-Bonet M, Benet J, Sun F, Navarro J, Abad C, Liehr T, Starke H, Greene C, Ko E, Martin RH (2005) Meiotic studies in two human reciprocal translocations and their association with spermatogenic failure. Hum Reprod 20:683–688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver-Bonet M, Liehr T, Nietzel A, Heller A, Starke H, Claussen U, Codina-Pascual M, Pujol A, Abad C, Egozcue J, Navarro J, Benet J (2003) Karyotyping of human synaptonemal complexes by cenM-FISH. Eur J Hum Genet 11:879–883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pacchierotti F, Adler ID, Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Mailhes JB (2007) Gender effects on the incidence of aneuploidy in mammalian germ cells. Environ Res 104:46–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters AH, Plug AW, van Vugt MJ, de Boer P (1997) A drying-down technique for the spreading of mammalian meiocytes from the male and female germ line. Chromosome Res 5:66–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pujol A, Boiso I, Benet J, Veiga A, Durban M, Campillo M, Egozcue J, Navarro J (2003) Analysis of nine chromosome probes in first polar bodies and metaphase II oocytes for the detection of aneuploidies. Eur J Hum Genet 11:325–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robles P, Roig I, Garcia R, Ortega A, Egozcue J, Cabero LL, Garcia M (2007) Pairing and syn-apsis in oocytes from female fetuses with euploid and aneuploid chromosome complements. Reproduction 133:899–907

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roig I, Robles P, Garcia R, Martinez-Flores I, Cabero L, Egozcue J, Liebe B, Scherthan H, Garcia M (2005) Chromosome 18 pairing behavior in human trisomic oocytes. Presence of an extra chromosome extends bouquet stage. Reproduction 129:565–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherthan H, Weich S, Schwegler H, Heyting C, Harle M, Cremer T (1996) Centromere and telomere movements during early meiotic prophase of mouse and man are associated with the onset of chromosome pairing. J Cell Biol 134:1109–1125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JL, Garry VF, Rademaker AW, Martin RH (2004) Human sperm aneuploidy after exposure to pesticides. Mol Reprod Dev 67:353–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal F, Moragas M, Catala V, Torello M, Santalo J, Calderon G, Gimenez C, Barri P, Egozcue J, Veiga A (1993) Sephadex filtration and human serum albumin gradients do no select spermatozoa by sex chromosome: A fluorescent in-situ hybridization study. Hum Reprod 8:1740–1743

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Fondo Investigación Sanitaria (Madrid) (project PI 051834).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Oliver-Bonet, M. (2009). FISH on Sperms, Spermatocytes and Oocytes. In: Liehr, T. (eds) Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) — Application Guide. Springer Protocols Handbooks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70581-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70581-9_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70580-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70581-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics