Skip to main content

DNA Binding (Gel Retardation Assay) Analysis for Identification of Aryl Hydrocarbon (Ah) Receptor Agonists and Antagonists

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Optimization in Drug Discovery

Part of the book series: Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology ((MIPT))

Abstract

The gel retardation assay (GRA), also referred as the electromobility shift assay (EMSA), is commonly used technique to examine DNA binding of transcription factors including activated nuclear receptors to their specific DNA recognition sites. GRA of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) relies on the in vitro ability of the cytosolic AhR protein complex to convert into its high affinity DNA binding form following its interaction with and activation by an AhR agonist and, as such, the GRA can be used for detection of such ligands. In addition, examination of the ability of a chemical to block agonist-dependent DNA binding of the AhR provides an avenue to identify AhR antagonists. Accordingly, this assay allows relatively rapid screening and identification of both AhR agonists and/or antagonists and unlike cell-based or in vivo assays, it essentially eliminates the confounding effect of cellular metabolism of the test compounds. The GRA can also be used with nuclear extracts obtained from treated cells to further identify and/or characterize compounds capable of stimulating nuclear translocation and DNA binding of the AhR in intact cells. The methods described here can be applied to cytosolic, nuclear and/or whole cell extracts from various species and tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dey B, Thukral S, Krishnan S et al (2012) DNA-protein interactions: methods for detection and analysis. Mol Cell Biochem 365:279–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Denison MS, Rogers JM, Rushing SR et al (2002) Analysis of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) signal transduction pathway. In: Maines M, Costa LG, Reed DJ et al (eds) Current protocols in toxicology. Wiley, New York, pp 4.8.1–4.8.45

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yao EF, Denison MS (1992) DNA sequence determinants for binding of transformed Ah receptor to a dioxin responsive element. Biochemistry 31:5060–5067

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Claessens F, Gewirth DT (2004) DNA recognition by nuclear receptors. Essays Biochem 40:59–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wan F, Lenardo MJ (2009) Specification of DNA binding activity of NF-kappaB proteins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 1(4):a000067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang DD (2006) Mechanistic studies of the Nrf2-Keap1 signaling pathway. Drug Metab Rev 38:769–789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Denison MS, Fisher JM, Whitlock JP Jr (1988) The DNA recognition site for the dioxin-Ah receptor complex. Nucleotide sequence and functional analysis. J Biol Chem 263:17221–17224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Denison MS, Yao E (1991) Characterization of the interaction of transformed rat hepatic Ah receptor with a dioxin responsive transcriptional enhancer. Arch Biochem Biophys 284:158–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hankinson O (1995) The aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 35:307–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Furness SG, Whelan F (2009) The pleiotropy of dioxin toxicity–xenobiotic misappropriation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor’s alternative physiological roles. Pharmacol Ther 124:336–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Beischlag TV, Morales JL, Hollingshead BD, Perdew GH (2008) The aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex in the control of gene expression. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 18:207–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. White SS, Birnbaum LS (2009) An overview of the effects of dioxins and dioxin-like compounds on vertebrates, as documented in human and ecological epidemiology. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 27:197–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Denison MS, Soshilov AA, He G et al (2011) Exactly the same but different: promiscuity and diversity in the molecular mechanisms of action of the aryl hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptor. Toxicol Sci 124:1–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bock KW (2013) The human Ah receptor: hints from dioxin toxicities to deregulated target genes and physiological functions. Biol Chem 394:729–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Heath-Pagliuso S, Rogers WJ, Tullis K, Seidel SD, Cenijn PH, Brouwer A, Denison MS (1998) Activation of the Ah receptor by tryptophan and tryptophan metabolites. Biochemistry 37:11508–11515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Denison MS, Seidel SD, Rogers WJ, Ziccardi M, Winter GM, Heath-Pagliuso S (1999) Natural and synthetic ligands for the Ah receptor. In: Wallace KB, Puga A (eds) Molecular biology approaches to toxicology. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, pp 393–410

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seidel SD, Li V, Winter GM et al (2000) Ah receptor-based chemical screening bioassays: application and limitations for the detection of Ah receptor agonists. Toxicol Sci 55:107–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Seidel SD, Winters GM, Rogers WJ, Ziccardi MH, Li V, Keser B, Denison MS (2001) Activation of the Ah receptor signaling pathway by prostaglandins. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 15:187–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nagy SR, Liu G, Lam K, Denison MS (2002) Identification of novel Ah receptor agonists using a high-throughput green fluorescent protein-based recombinant cell bioassay. Biochemistry 41:861–868

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Denison MS, Nagy SR (2003) Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor by structurally diverse exogenous and endogenous chemicals. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 43:309–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao B, DeGroot D, Hayashi A, He G, Denison MS (2010) CH223191 is a ligand-selective antagonist of the Ah (dioxin) receptor. Toxicol Sci 117:393–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao B, Bohonowych JES, Timme-Laragy A, Jung D, Affatato AA, Rice RH, Di Giulio RT, Denison MS (2013) Common commercial and consumer products contain activators of the aryl hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptor. PLoS One 8(2):e56860

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang S, Lei P, Liu X et al (2009) The aryl hydrocarbon receptor as a target for estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer chemotherapy. Endocr Relat Cancer 16:835–844

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vondracek J, Umannova L, Machala M (2011) Interactions of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor with inflammatory mediators: beyond CYP1A regulation. Curr Drug Metab 12:89–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Montelone I, MacDonald TT, Pallone F, Montelenoe G (2012) The aryl hydrocarbon receptor in inflammatory bowel disease: linking the environment to disease pathogenesis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 28:310–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Anderson G, Beischlag TV, Vinciguerra M, Mazzoccoli G (2013) The circadian clock circuitry and the AHR signaling pathway in physiology and pathology. Biochem Pharmacol 85:1405–1416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Andrews NC, Faller DV (1991) A rapid micropreparation technique for extraction of DNA-binding proteins from limiting numbers of mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res 19:2499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Denison MS, Vella LM, Okey AB (1986) Structure and function of the Ah receptor for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Species difference in molecular properties of the receptors from mouse and rat hepatic cytosols. J Biol Chem 261:3987–3995

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Soshilov, A.A., Denison, M.S. (2014). DNA Binding (Gel Retardation Assay) Analysis for Identification of Aryl Hydrocarbon (Ah) Receptor Agonists and Antagonists. In: Caldwell, G., Yan, Z. (eds) Optimization in Drug Discovery. Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-742-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-742-6_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-741-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-742-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics