Abstract
Large-scale biochemical analysis of cell-specific signaling can be interrogated in cocultures of Eph receptor- and ephrin-expressing cells by combining proteomics analysis with cell-specific metabolic labeling. In this chapter, we describe how to perform such large-scale analysis, including the generation of cells stably expressing the receptors and ligands of interest, optimization steps for Eph–ephrin coculture, and the proteomics analysis. As the experimental details may vary depending on the specific system that is being interrogated, the goal of the chapter is mainly to provide sufficient experimental context for experienced researchers to set up and conduct these experiments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pasquale EB (2008) Eph-ephrin bidirectional signaling in physiology and disease. Cell 133: 38–52
Lackmann M, Boyd AW (2008) Eph, a protein family coming of age: more confusion, insight, or complexity? Sci Signal 1:re2
Pasquale EB (2010) Eph receptors and ephrins in cancer: bidirectional signaling and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer 10:165–180
Holland SJ, Gale NW, Mbamalu G et al (1996) Bidirectional signalling through the EPH-family receptor Nuk and its transmembrane ligands. Nature 383:722–725
Bruckner K, Pasquale EB, Klein R (1997) Tyrosine phosphorylation of transmembrane ligands for Eph receptors. Science 275: 1640–1643
Henkemeyer M, Orioli D, Henderson JT et al (1996) Nuk controls pathfinding of commissural axons in the mammalian central nervous system. Cell 86:35–46
Holland SJ, Gale NW, Gish GD et al (1997) Juxtamembrane tyrosine residues couple the Eph family receptor EphB2/Nuk to specific SH2 domain proteins in neuronal cells. EMBO J 16:3877–3888
Wybenga-Groot LE, Baskin B, Ong SH et al (2001) Structural basis for autoinhibition of the Ephb2 receptor tyrosine kinase by the unphosphorylated juxtamembrane region. Cell 106:745–757
Cowan CA, Henkemeyer M (2001) The SH2/SH3 adaptor Grb4 transduces Bephrin reverse signals. Nature 413:174–179
Ong S-E, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I et al (2002) Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 1:376–386
Poliakov A, Cotrina ML, Pasini A et al (2008) Regulation of EphB2 activation and cell repulsion by feedback control of the MAPK pathway. J Cell Biol 183:933–947
Henkemeyer M, Marengere LE, McGlade J et al (1994) Immunolocalization of the Nuk receptor tyrosine kinase suggests roles in segmental patterning of the brain and axonogenesis. Oncogene 9:1001–1014
Moriyoshi K, Richards LJ, Akazawa C et al (1996) Labeling neural cells using adenoviral gene transfer of membrane-targeted GFP. Neuron 16:255–260
Jørgensen C, Sherman A, Chen GI et al (2009) Cell-specific information processing in segregating populations of Eph receptor ephrin-expressing cells. Science 326: 1502–1509
Ong S-E, Mann MA (2007) Practical recipe for stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC). Nat Protocol 1: 2650–2660
Harsha HC, Molina H, Pandey A (2008) Quantitative proteomics using stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture. Nat Protocol 3:505–516
Blagoev B, Mann M (2006) Quantitative proteomics to study mitogen-activated protein kinases. Methods 40:243–250
Van Hoof D, Pinkse MW, Oostwaard DW et al (2007) An experimental correction for arginine-to-proline conversion artifacts in SILAC-based quantitative proteomics. Nat Methods 4:677–678
Park SK, Liao L, Kim JY et al (2009) A computational approach to correct arginine-to-proline conversion in quantitative proteomics. Nat Methods 6:184–185
Bendall SC, Hughes C, Stewert MH et al (2008) Prevention of amino acid conversion in SILAC experiments with embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Proteomics 7:1587–1597
Rush J, Moritz A, Lee KA et al (2005) Immunoaffinity profiling of tyrosine phosphorylation in cancer cells. Nat Biotechnol 23:94–101
Zhang Y, Wolf-Yadlin A, Ross PL et al (2005) Time-resolved mass spectrometry of tyrosine phosphorylation sites in the epidermal growth factor receptor signaling network reveals dynamic modules. Mol Cell Proteomics 4: 1240–1250
Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Robinson PJ et al (2007) SIMAC (sequential elution from IMAC), a phosphoproteomics strategy for the rapid separation of monophosphorylated from multiply phosphorylated peptides. Mol Cell Proteomics 7:661–671
Cox J, Matic I, Hilger M et al (2009) A practical guide to the MaxQuant computational platform for SILAC-based quantitative proteomics. Nat Protocol 4:698–705
Cox J, Mann M (2008) MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol 26:1367–1372
Shevchenko A, Tomas H, Havlisbreve J et al (2007) In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nat Protocol 1:2856–2860
Boisvert FM, Ahmad Y, Gierlinski M et al (2012) A quantitative spatial proteomics analysis of proteome turnover in human cells. Mol Cell Proteomics 11:M111.011429
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of Tony Pawson and David Wilkinson. Claus Jorgensen is a recipient of a CR-UK Career Establishment Award.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Jorgensen, C., Poliakov, A. (2013). Proteomics Analysis of Contact-Initiated Eph Receptor–Ephrin Signaling. In: Baudino, T. (eds) Cell-Cell Interactions. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1066. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-604-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-604-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-603-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-604-7
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols